腹股沟下fish技术和腹股沟下微静脉曲张电切及硬化治疗中动脉周围静脉粘连的挑战性病例:一项前瞻性比较研究。

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 ANDROLOGY
Amr Elahwany, Nashaat Nabil, Sameh Fayek GamalEl Din, Ahmed Raef Sadek, Ahmed Ewais Sayed, Ahmed Ragab
{"title":"腹股沟下fish技术和腹股沟下微静脉曲张电切及硬化治疗中动脉周围静脉粘连的挑战性病例:一项前瞻性比较研究。","authors":"Amr Elahwany, Nashaat Nabil, Sameh Fayek GamalEl Din, Ahmed Raef Sadek, Ahmed Ewais Sayed, Ahmed Ragab","doi":"10.1186/s12610-025-00250-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To the best of our knowledge, there is a gap in the review of literature about the most suitable varicocelectomy technique in isolating and ligating adherent periarterial vein(s). Consequently, leaving the artery intact or ligating it together with the adherent vein may pose a challenge. We conducted a comparative prospective study to assess the outcomes of the three techniques namely Fisch, sclerotherapy and microvaricoclectomy (MSV).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The patients who underwent MSV showed the longest operative time (66.29 ± 2.78 min), followed by Fisch technique (56.94 ± 3.07 min) then sclerotherapy (55.45 ± 1.99). Thus, the difference in the operative time between the three techniques was statistically significant (P < 0.001). Regarding the postoperative right vein diameter, MSV group showed the largest diameter (2.14 ± 0.15 mm), followed by Fisch technique (2.13 ± 0.15 mm) then sclerotherapy (1.75 ± 0.42 mm). Regarding the postoperative left vein diameter, MSV group showed again the largest diameter (2.17 ± 0.21 mm), followed by Fisch technique (2.14 ± 0.15 mm) then sclerotherapy (1.75 ± 0.42 mm). Moreover, the patients who underwent sclerotherapy showed the highest postoperative progressive sperm motility percent (25.27 ± 4.00%), followed by Fisch technique (21.56 ± 7.30%) then MSV group (19.85 ± 6.33%). Post hoc pair wise comparisons revealed that sclerotherapy and Fisch technique had a significantly higher effectiveness in reducing operative time than MSV. Additionally, it revealed that sclerotherapy technique had a significantly higher effectiveness in reducing postoperative vein diameters measurement than MSV and Fisch technique. Post hoc pair wise comparisons revealed that sclerotherapy technique had a significantly higher effectiveness in improving the postoperative progressive sperm motility percent than MSV. Patients who underwent the 3 techniques demonstrated statistically significant differences between baseline and post-operative vein diameter, reflux duration, sperm concentration, progressive sperm motility, progressive motile count/ejaculate and sperm abnormal forms.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The 3 techniques showed significant improvement in the semen parameters after 3 months in the studied patients. However, sclerotherapy technique showed a significantly higher effectiveness in improving the postoperative progressive sperm motility percent compared to MSV.</p>","PeriodicalId":8730,"journal":{"name":"Basic and Clinical Andrology","volume":"35 1","pages":"5"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11792355/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Challenging cases of adherent periarterial vein during subinguinal Fisch technique and subinguinal micro-varicocelecotmy and sclerotherapy: a prospective comparative study.\",\"authors\":\"Amr Elahwany, Nashaat Nabil, Sameh Fayek GamalEl Din, Ahmed Raef Sadek, Ahmed Ewais Sayed, Ahmed Ragab\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12610-025-00250-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To the best of our knowledge, there is a gap in the review of literature about the most suitable varicocelectomy technique in isolating and ligating adherent periarterial vein(s). Consequently, leaving the artery intact or ligating it together with the adherent vein may pose a challenge. We conducted a comparative prospective study to assess the outcomes of the three techniques namely Fisch, sclerotherapy and microvaricoclectomy (MSV).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The patients who underwent MSV showed the longest operative time (66.29 ± 2.78 min), followed by Fisch technique (56.94 ± 3.07 min) then sclerotherapy (55.45 ± 1.99). Thus, the difference in the operative time between the three techniques was statistically significant (P < 0.001). Regarding the postoperative right vein diameter, MSV group showed the largest diameter (2.14 ± 0.15 mm), followed by Fisch technique (2.13 ± 0.15 mm) then sclerotherapy (1.75 ± 0.42 mm). Regarding the postoperative left vein diameter, MSV group showed again the largest diameter (2.17 ± 0.21 mm), followed by Fisch technique (2.14 ± 0.15 mm) then sclerotherapy (1.75 ± 0.42 mm). Moreover, the patients who underwent sclerotherapy showed the highest postoperative progressive sperm motility percent (25.27 ± 4.00%), followed by Fisch technique (21.56 ± 7.30%) then MSV group (19.85 ± 6.33%). Post hoc pair wise comparisons revealed that sclerotherapy and Fisch technique had a significantly higher effectiveness in reducing operative time than MSV. Additionally, it revealed that sclerotherapy technique had a significantly higher effectiveness in reducing postoperative vein diameters measurement than MSV and Fisch technique. Post hoc pair wise comparisons revealed that sclerotherapy technique had a significantly higher effectiveness in improving the postoperative progressive sperm motility percent than MSV. Patients who underwent the 3 techniques demonstrated statistically significant differences between baseline and post-operative vein diameter, reflux duration, sperm concentration, progressive sperm motility, progressive motile count/ejaculate and sperm abnormal forms.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The 3 techniques showed significant improvement in the semen parameters after 3 months in the studied patients. However, sclerotherapy technique showed a significantly higher effectiveness in improving the postoperative progressive sperm motility percent compared to MSV.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8730,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Basic and Clinical Andrology\",\"volume\":\"35 1\",\"pages\":\"5\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11792355/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Basic and Clinical Andrology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12610-025-00250-9\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ANDROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Basic and Clinical Andrology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12610-025-00250-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANDROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:据我们所知,关于分离和结扎粘附动脉周围静脉的最合适的精索静脉曲张切除术技术的文献综述存在空白。因此,保持动脉完整或将其与附着静脉结扎在一起可能会带来挑战。我们进行了一项比较前瞻性研究,以评估三种技术的结果,即Fisch,硬化疗法和微静脉曲张切除术(MSV)。结果:MSV组手术时间最长(66.29±2.78 min),其次为Fisch技术(56.94±3.07 min),其次为硬化治疗(55.45±1.99 min)。结论:3种技术对研究患者术后3个月的精液参数均有显著改善。然而,与MSV相比,硬化治疗技术在改善术后进展性精子活力方面显示出明显更高的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Challenging cases of adherent periarterial vein during subinguinal Fisch technique and subinguinal micro-varicocelecotmy and sclerotherapy: a prospective comparative study.

Background: To the best of our knowledge, there is a gap in the review of literature about the most suitable varicocelectomy technique in isolating and ligating adherent periarterial vein(s). Consequently, leaving the artery intact or ligating it together with the adherent vein may pose a challenge. We conducted a comparative prospective study to assess the outcomes of the three techniques namely Fisch, sclerotherapy and microvaricoclectomy (MSV).

Results: The patients who underwent MSV showed the longest operative time (66.29 ± 2.78 min), followed by Fisch technique (56.94 ± 3.07 min) then sclerotherapy (55.45 ± 1.99). Thus, the difference in the operative time between the three techniques was statistically significant (P < 0.001). Regarding the postoperative right vein diameter, MSV group showed the largest diameter (2.14 ± 0.15 mm), followed by Fisch technique (2.13 ± 0.15 mm) then sclerotherapy (1.75 ± 0.42 mm). Regarding the postoperative left vein diameter, MSV group showed again the largest diameter (2.17 ± 0.21 mm), followed by Fisch technique (2.14 ± 0.15 mm) then sclerotherapy (1.75 ± 0.42 mm). Moreover, the patients who underwent sclerotherapy showed the highest postoperative progressive sperm motility percent (25.27 ± 4.00%), followed by Fisch technique (21.56 ± 7.30%) then MSV group (19.85 ± 6.33%). Post hoc pair wise comparisons revealed that sclerotherapy and Fisch technique had a significantly higher effectiveness in reducing operative time than MSV. Additionally, it revealed that sclerotherapy technique had a significantly higher effectiveness in reducing postoperative vein diameters measurement than MSV and Fisch technique. Post hoc pair wise comparisons revealed that sclerotherapy technique had a significantly higher effectiveness in improving the postoperative progressive sperm motility percent than MSV. Patients who underwent the 3 techniques demonstrated statistically significant differences between baseline and post-operative vein diameter, reflux duration, sperm concentration, progressive sperm motility, progressive motile count/ejaculate and sperm abnormal forms.

Conclusion: The 3 techniques showed significant improvement in the semen parameters after 3 months in the studied patients. However, sclerotherapy technique showed a significantly higher effectiveness in improving the postoperative progressive sperm motility percent compared to MSV.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Basic and Clinical Andrology
Basic and Clinical Andrology Medicine-Urology
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
审稿时长
22 weeks
期刊介绍: Basic and Clinical Andrology is an open access journal in the domain of andrology covering all aspects of male reproductive and sexual health in both human and animal models. The journal aims to bring to light the various clinical advancements and research developments in andrology from the international community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信