Md Mazharul Islam, Pronesh Dutta, Devendra Bansal, Gyanendra Gongal, Elmoubashar Farag, Ricardo J. Soares Magalhaes, John I. Alawneh, Jane Heller, Mohammad Mahmudul Hassan
{"title":"南亚国家人类-动物-环境交界区克氏体虫病的流行和危险因素:系统综述和荟萃分析","authors":"Md Mazharul Islam, Pronesh Dutta, Devendra Bansal, Gyanendra Gongal, Elmoubashar Farag, Ricardo J. Soares Magalhaes, John I. Alawneh, Jane Heller, Mohammad Mahmudul Hassan","doi":"10.1155/tbed/2890693","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n <p>Coxiellosis, a zoonotic bacterial infection caused by <i>Coxiella burnetii</i>, affects diverse mammalian hosts and is prevalent worldwide, including in South Asia. This study aimed to investigate the epidemiology of Coxiellosis in South Asia, focusing on distribution, host diversity, prevalence, and associated risk factors at the human–animal–environment interface. Following the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and a registered protocol, online searches were conducted in Embase, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science on August 6, 2023, to retrieve articles from the South Asian countries without restrictions on hosts or timeframe. Two authors independently reviewed, extracted data, and assessed quality based on predefined criteria, which were then evaluated and compiled into a single document and analyzed. The review identified 112 articles published between 1954 and 2023. Among humans, the estimated pooled seroprevalence (EPSP) was 9.2%, and the estimated pooled carrier prevalence (EPCP) was 6.2%. Ruminant herd-level EPSP and EPCP were 77.3% and 74.6%, and at the individual level, were 11.9% and 5.3%, respectively. Seroprevalence was significantly influenced by country, tick infestation, reproductive disorders, age, and body condition of ruminants. Nonruminant mammals, such as dogs (16.8%), horses (6.0%), pigs (3.9%), and rodents (14.8%), were also seropositive. Several avian and reptile species showed EPSP rates of 14.5% and 29.2%, respectively. Bacterial DNA was detected in ticks and soil samples, with EPCP of 1.0% and 3.3%, respectively. We recommend prioritizing One Health surveillance and intervention to prevent infections among humans, livestock, poultry, pets, and wildlife. Special emphasis should be placed on aged and emaciated animals, tick infestations, and animals with reproductive disorders.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":234,"journal":{"name":"Transboundary and Emerging Diseases","volume":"2025 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/tbed/2890693","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prevalence and Risk Factors of Coxiellosis at the Human–Animal–Environment Interface in the South Asian Countries: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis\",\"authors\":\"Md Mazharul Islam, Pronesh Dutta, Devendra Bansal, Gyanendra Gongal, Elmoubashar Farag, Ricardo J. Soares Magalhaes, John I. Alawneh, Jane Heller, Mohammad Mahmudul Hassan\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/tbed/2890693\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n <p>Coxiellosis, a zoonotic bacterial infection caused by <i>Coxiella burnetii</i>, affects diverse mammalian hosts and is prevalent worldwide, including in South Asia. This study aimed to investigate the epidemiology of Coxiellosis in South Asia, focusing on distribution, host diversity, prevalence, and associated risk factors at the human–animal–environment interface. Following the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and a registered protocol, online searches were conducted in Embase, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science on August 6, 2023, to retrieve articles from the South Asian countries without restrictions on hosts or timeframe. Two authors independently reviewed, extracted data, and assessed quality based on predefined criteria, which were then evaluated and compiled into a single document and analyzed. The review identified 112 articles published between 1954 and 2023. Among humans, the estimated pooled seroprevalence (EPSP) was 9.2%, and the estimated pooled carrier prevalence (EPCP) was 6.2%. Ruminant herd-level EPSP and EPCP were 77.3% and 74.6%, and at the individual level, were 11.9% and 5.3%, respectively. Seroprevalence was significantly influenced by country, tick infestation, reproductive disorders, age, and body condition of ruminants. Nonruminant mammals, such as dogs (16.8%), horses (6.0%), pigs (3.9%), and rodents (14.8%), were also seropositive. Several avian and reptile species showed EPSP rates of 14.5% and 29.2%, respectively. Bacterial DNA was detected in ticks and soil samples, with EPCP of 1.0% and 3.3%, respectively. We recommend prioritizing One Health surveillance and intervention to prevent infections among humans, livestock, poultry, pets, and wildlife. Special emphasis should be placed on aged and emaciated animals, tick infestations, and animals with reproductive disorders.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":234,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transboundary and Emerging Diseases\",\"volume\":\"2025 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/tbed/2890693\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transboundary and Emerging Diseases\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/tbed/2890693\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transboundary and Emerging Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/tbed/2890693","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
克希菌病是一种由伯氏克希菌引起的人畜共患性细菌感染,影响多种哺乳动物宿主,在世界范围内流行,包括在南亚。本研究旨在调查南亚地区克希菌病的流行病学,重点关注人-动物-环境界面的分布、宿主多样性、流行率和相关危险因素。根据系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)指南和注册协议,于2023年8月6日在Embase、PubMed、Scopus和Web of Science中进行在线搜索,检索南亚国家的文章,不受主机或时间框架的限制。两位作者独立审查,提取数据,并根据预定义的标准评估质量,然后评估并汇编成单个文档并进行分析。该审查确定了1954年至2023年间发表的112篇文章。在人类中,估计的总血清患病率(EPSP)为9.2%,估计的总携带者患病率(EPCP)为6.2%。反刍动物群体水平的EPSP和EPCP分别为77.3%和74.6%,个体水平的EPSP和EPCP分别为11.9%和5.3%。反刍动物血清阳性率受国家、蜱虫感染、生殖障碍、年龄和身体状况的显著影响。非反刍哺乳动物,如狗(16.8%)、马(6.0%)、猪(3.9%)和啮齿动物(14.8%)也呈血清阳性。鸟类和爬行动物的EPSP率分别为14.5%和29.2%。蜱和土壤样品中检出细菌DNA, EPCP分别为1.0%和3.3%。我们建议优先进行One Health监测和干预,以预防人类、牲畜、家禽、宠物和野生动物之间的感染。应特别重视年老和瘦弱的动物、蜱虫侵扰和有生殖障碍的动物。
Prevalence and Risk Factors of Coxiellosis at the Human–Animal–Environment Interface in the South Asian Countries: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Coxiellosis, a zoonotic bacterial infection caused by Coxiella burnetii, affects diverse mammalian hosts and is prevalent worldwide, including in South Asia. This study aimed to investigate the epidemiology of Coxiellosis in South Asia, focusing on distribution, host diversity, prevalence, and associated risk factors at the human–animal–environment interface. Following the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and a registered protocol, online searches were conducted in Embase, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science on August 6, 2023, to retrieve articles from the South Asian countries without restrictions on hosts or timeframe. Two authors independently reviewed, extracted data, and assessed quality based on predefined criteria, which were then evaluated and compiled into a single document and analyzed. The review identified 112 articles published between 1954 and 2023. Among humans, the estimated pooled seroprevalence (EPSP) was 9.2%, and the estimated pooled carrier prevalence (EPCP) was 6.2%. Ruminant herd-level EPSP and EPCP were 77.3% and 74.6%, and at the individual level, were 11.9% and 5.3%, respectively. Seroprevalence was significantly influenced by country, tick infestation, reproductive disorders, age, and body condition of ruminants. Nonruminant mammals, such as dogs (16.8%), horses (6.0%), pigs (3.9%), and rodents (14.8%), were also seropositive. Several avian and reptile species showed EPSP rates of 14.5% and 29.2%, respectively. Bacterial DNA was detected in ticks and soil samples, with EPCP of 1.0% and 3.3%, respectively. We recommend prioritizing One Health surveillance and intervention to prevent infections among humans, livestock, poultry, pets, and wildlife. Special emphasis should be placed on aged and emaciated animals, tick infestations, and animals with reproductive disorders.
期刊介绍:
Transboundary and Emerging Diseases brings together in one place the latest research on infectious diseases considered to hold the greatest economic threat to animals and humans worldwide. The journal provides a venue for global research on their diagnosis, prevention and management, and for papers on public health, pathogenesis, epidemiology, statistical modeling, diagnostics, biosecurity issues, genomics, vaccine development and rapid communication of new outbreaks. Papers should include timely research approaches using state-of-the-art technologies. The editors encourage papers adopting a science-based approach on socio-economic and environmental factors influencing the management of the bio-security threat posed by these diseases, including risk analysis and disease spread modeling. Preference will be given to communications focusing on novel science-based approaches to controlling transboundary and emerging diseases. The following topics are generally considered out-of-scope, but decisions are made on a case-by-case basis (for example, studies on cryptic wildlife populations, and those on potential species extinctions):
Pathogen discovery: a common pathogen newly recognised in a specific country, or a new pathogen or genetic sequence for which there is little context about — or insights regarding — its emergence or spread.
Prevalence estimation surveys and risk factor studies based on survey (rather than longitudinal) methodology, except when such studies are unique. Surveys of knowledge, attitudes and practices are within scope.
Diagnostic test development if not accompanied by robust sensitivity and specificity estimation from field studies.
Studies focused only on laboratory methods in which relevance to disease emergence and spread is not obvious or can not be inferred (“pure research” type studies).
Narrative literature reviews which do not generate new knowledge. Systematic and scoping reviews, and meta-analyses are within scope.