亚马逊森林砍伐和二氧化碳排放:使用GVAR的宏观经济方法

IF 3.2 3区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS
Luccas Assis Attílio
{"title":"亚马逊森林砍伐和二氧化碳排放:使用GVAR的宏观经济方法","authors":"Luccas Assis Attílio","doi":"10.1111/jors.12738","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>We analyzed the relationship between economic variables, Amazon deforestation, and CO<sub>2</sub> emissions in Brazil. We used a macroeconomic approach of a system of open economies (global vector autoregressive [GVAR]). We constructed the international economy using 34 countries, representing 77% of the world GDP and 80% of world CO<sub>2</sub> emissions. GVAR allows us to simulate the world economy, capture spillover effects, incorporate the externality of gas emissions, treating Brazil as a small open economy, and including trade integration in the analysis. We found that domestic and external shocks affect Amazon deforestation and CO<sub>2</sub> emissions; the principal external shock is the Chinese one, followed by the European and the US shocks. China, directly and indirectly, affects CO<sub>2</sub> emissions and deforestation in Brazil through two channels (exchange rates and policy rates). The estimates showed that Brazilian currency and commodity prices are relevant for deforestation, while industrial production is for gas emissions. Other results are that (i) the Brazilian economy affects CO<sub>2</sub> emissions in Latin America (and the principal influence of China is on Asia), and (ii) the Chinese shock loses importance when using bilateral trade in 1999–2001, when China was not a fundamental trade partner of Brazil. Alternative model configurations demonstrate that soybean prices and Argentina influence Brazilian carbon emissions and Amazon deforestation. Specifically, soybean prices emerge as a major driver of carbon emissions. These results suggest that geography and trade integration matter to understanding Amazon deforestation and CO<sub>2</sub> emissions. Our estimates highlight the importance of government policies and international cooperation in curbing Amazon deforestation.</p>","PeriodicalId":48059,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Regional Science","volume":"65 1","pages":"189-220"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Amazon deforestation and CO2 emissions: A macroeconomic approach using the GVAR\",\"authors\":\"Luccas Assis Attílio\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jors.12738\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>We analyzed the relationship between economic variables, Amazon deforestation, and CO<sub>2</sub> emissions in Brazil. We used a macroeconomic approach of a system of open economies (global vector autoregressive [GVAR]). We constructed the international economy using 34 countries, representing 77% of the world GDP and 80% of world CO<sub>2</sub> emissions. GVAR allows us to simulate the world economy, capture spillover effects, incorporate the externality of gas emissions, treating Brazil as a small open economy, and including trade integration in the analysis. We found that domestic and external shocks affect Amazon deforestation and CO<sub>2</sub> emissions; the principal external shock is the Chinese one, followed by the European and the US shocks. China, directly and indirectly, affects CO<sub>2</sub> emissions and deforestation in Brazil through two channels (exchange rates and policy rates). The estimates showed that Brazilian currency and commodity prices are relevant for deforestation, while industrial production is for gas emissions. Other results are that (i) the Brazilian economy affects CO<sub>2</sub> emissions in Latin America (and the principal influence of China is on Asia), and (ii) the Chinese shock loses importance when using bilateral trade in 1999–2001, when China was not a fundamental trade partner of Brazil. Alternative model configurations demonstrate that soybean prices and Argentina influence Brazilian carbon emissions and Amazon deforestation. Specifically, soybean prices emerge as a major driver of carbon emissions. These results suggest that geography and trade integration matter to understanding Amazon deforestation and CO<sub>2</sub> emissions. Our estimates highlight the importance of government policies and international cooperation in curbing Amazon deforestation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48059,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Regional Science\",\"volume\":\"65 1\",\"pages\":\"189-220\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Regional Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jors.12738\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Regional Science","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jors.12738","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们分析了经济变量、亚马逊森林砍伐和巴西二氧化碳排放之间的关系。我们使用了开放经济系统的宏观经济方法(全球向量自回归[GVAR])。我们用34个国家构建了国际经济,占世界GDP的77%,占世界二氧化碳排放量的80%。GVAR使我们能够模拟世界经济,捕捉溢出效应,纳入天然气排放的外部性,将巴西视为一个小型开放经济体,并将贸易一体化纳入分析。我们发现,国内和外部冲击影响亚马逊森林砍伐和二氧化碳排放;主要的外部冲击是中国的冲击,其次是欧洲和美国的冲击。中国通过两个渠道(汇率和政策利率)直接或间接地影响巴西的二氧化碳排放和森林砍伐。估计表明,巴西货币和商品价格与森林砍伐有关,而工业生产与气体排放有关。其他结果是:(1)巴西经济影响拉丁美洲的二氧化碳排放(中国主要影响亚洲),(2)当使用1999-2001年的双边贸易时,中国冲击失去了重要性,当时中国不是巴西的基本贸易伙伴。替代模型配置表明,大豆价格和阿根廷影响巴西的碳排放和亚马逊森林砍伐。具体来说,大豆价格成为碳排放的主要驱动因素。这些结果表明,地理和贸易一体化对理解亚马逊森林砍伐和二氧化碳排放很重要。我们的估计强调了政府政策和国际合作在遏制亚马逊森林砍伐方面的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Amazon deforestation and CO2 emissions: A macroeconomic approach using the GVAR

We analyzed the relationship between economic variables, Amazon deforestation, and CO2 emissions in Brazil. We used a macroeconomic approach of a system of open economies (global vector autoregressive [GVAR]). We constructed the international economy using 34 countries, representing 77% of the world GDP and 80% of world CO2 emissions. GVAR allows us to simulate the world economy, capture spillover effects, incorporate the externality of gas emissions, treating Brazil as a small open economy, and including trade integration in the analysis. We found that domestic and external shocks affect Amazon deforestation and CO2 emissions; the principal external shock is the Chinese one, followed by the European and the US shocks. China, directly and indirectly, affects CO2 emissions and deforestation in Brazil through two channels (exchange rates and policy rates). The estimates showed that Brazilian currency and commodity prices are relevant for deforestation, while industrial production is for gas emissions. Other results are that (i) the Brazilian economy affects CO2 emissions in Latin America (and the principal influence of China is on Asia), and (ii) the Chinese shock loses importance when using bilateral trade in 1999–2001, when China was not a fundamental trade partner of Brazil. Alternative model configurations demonstrate that soybean prices and Argentina influence Brazilian carbon emissions and Amazon deforestation. Specifically, soybean prices emerge as a major driver of carbon emissions. These results suggest that geography and trade integration matter to understanding Amazon deforestation and CO2 emissions. Our estimates highlight the importance of government policies and international cooperation in curbing Amazon deforestation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
6.70%
发文量
54
期刊介绍: The Journal of Regional Science (JRS) publishes original analytical research at the intersection of economics and quantitative geography. Since 1958, the JRS has published leading contributions to urban and regional thought including rigorous methodological contributions and seminal theoretical pieces. The JRS is one of the most highly cited journals in urban and regional research, planning, geography, and the environment. The JRS publishes work that advances our understanding of the geographic dimensions of urban and regional economies, human settlements, and policies related to cities and regions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信