改进的土壤风化模型:与实验数据的关键比较

IF 4.4 2区 地球科学 Q1 METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES
Matteo B. Bertagni, Salvatore Calabrese, Giuseppe Cipolla, Leonardo V. Noto, Amilcare Porporato
{"title":"改进的土壤风化模型:与实验数据的关键比较","authors":"Matteo B. Bertagni,&nbsp;Salvatore Calabrese,&nbsp;Giuseppe Cipolla,&nbsp;Leonardo V. Noto,&nbsp;Amilcare Porporato","doi":"10.1029/2024MS004224","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Enhanced weathering (EW) is a promising strategy to remove atmospheric <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mrow>\n <msub>\n <mtext>CO</mtext>\n <mn>2</mn>\n </msub>\n </mrow>\n </mrow>\n <annotation> ${\\text{CO}}_{2}$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> by amending agricultural and forestry soils with ground silicate rocks. However, current model-based EW assessments face large uncertainties stemming from the intricate interplay among soil processes, compounded by the absence of a detailed comparison with available observational data. Here, we address this critical gap by first advancing a dynamic, ecohydrological, and biogeochemical Soil Model for Enhanced Weathering (SMEW). We then conduct a hierarchical model-experiment comparison with four experimental data sets of increasing complexity, from simple closed incubation systems to open mesocosm experiments. The comparison demonstrates SMEW's ability to capture the dynamics of primary variables, including soil moisture, alkalinity, and inorganic carbon. The comparison also reveals that weathering rates are consistently lower than traditionally assumed by up to two orders of magnitude. We finally discuss the implications for carbon removal scenarios and avenues for further theoretical and experimental explorations.</p>","PeriodicalId":14881,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems","volume":"17 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2024MS004224","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Advancing Enhanced Weathering Modeling in Soils: Critical Comparison With Experimental Data\",\"authors\":\"Matteo B. Bertagni,&nbsp;Salvatore Calabrese,&nbsp;Giuseppe Cipolla,&nbsp;Leonardo V. Noto,&nbsp;Amilcare Porporato\",\"doi\":\"10.1029/2024MS004224\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Enhanced weathering (EW) is a promising strategy to remove atmospheric <span></span><math>\\n <semantics>\\n <mrow>\\n <mrow>\\n <msub>\\n <mtext>CO</mtext>\\n <mn>2</mn>\\n </msub>\\n </mrow>\\n </mrow>\\n <annotation> ${\\\\text{CO}}_{2}$</annotation>\\n </semantics></math> by amending agricultural and forestry soils with ground silicate rocks. However, current model-based EW assessments face large uncertainties stemming from the intricate interplay among soil processes, compounded by the absence of a detailed comparison with available observational data. Here, we address this critical gap by first advancing a dynamic, ecohydrological, and biogeochemical Soil Model for Enhanced Weathering (SMEW). We then conduct a hierarchical model-experiment comparison with four experimental data sets of increasing complexity, from simple closed incubation systems to open mesocosm experiments. The comparison demonstrates SMEW's ability to capture the dynamics of primary variables, including soil moisture, alkalinity, and inorganic carbon. The comparison also reveals that weathering rates are consistently lower than traditionally assumed by up to two orders of magnitude. We finally discuss the implications for carbon removal scenarios and avenues for further theoretical and experimental explorations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14881,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2024MS004224\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2024MS004224\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2024MS004224","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

增强风化作用(EW)是一种很有前途的方法,可以通过土壤中的硅酸盐岩石对农林土壤进行改良来去除大气中的CO 2。然而,由于土壤过程之间错综复杂的相互作用,加上缺乏与现有观测数据的详细比较,目前基于模式的生态环境评估面临着很大的不确定性。在这里,我们通过首先提出一个动态、生态水文和生物地球化学土壤模型来解决这一关键缺口。然后,我们对四个日益复杂的实验数据集(从简单的封闭孵化系统到开放的中观实验)进行了分层模型实验比较。比较表明SMEW能够捕捉主要变量的动态,包括土壤湿度、碱度和无机碳。对比还显示,风化速率始终比传统假设的要低两个数量级。最后,我们讨论了对碳去除方案的影响以及进一步理论和实验探索的途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Advancing Enhanced Weathering Modeling in Soils: Critical Comparison With Experimental Data

Advancing Enhanced Weathering Modeling in Soils: Critical Comparison With Experimental Data

Enhanced weathering (EW) is a promising strategy to remove atmospheric CO 2 ${\text{CO}}_{2}$ by amending agricultural and forestry soils with ground silicate rocks. However, current model-based EW assessments face large uncertainties stemming from the intricate interplay among soil processes, compounded by the absence of a detailed comparison with available observational data. Here, we address this critical gap by first advancing a dynamic, ecohydrological, and biogeochemical Soil Model for Enhanced Weathering (SMEW). We then conduct a hierarchical model-experiment comparison with four experimental data sets of increasing complexity, from simple closed incubation systems to open mesocosm experiments. The comparison demonstrates SMEW's ability to capture the dynamics of primary variables, including soil moisture, alkalinity, and inorganic carbon. The comparison also reveals that weathering rates are consistently lower than traditionally assumed by up to two orders of magnitude. We finally discuss the implications for carbon removal scenarios and avenues for further theoretical and experimental explorations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems
Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES-
CiteScore
11.40
自引率
11.80%
发文量
241
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems (JAMES) is committed to advancing the science of Earth systems modeling by offering high-quality scientific research through online availability and open access licensing. JAMES invites authors and readers from the international Earth systems modeling community. Open access. Articles are available free of charge for everyone with Internet access to view and download. Formal peer review. Supplemental material, such as code samples, images, and visualizations, is published at no additional charge. No additional charge for color figures. Modest page charges to cover production costs. Articles published in high-quality full text PDF, HTML, and XML. Internal and external reference linking, DOI registration, and forward linking via CrossRef.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信