河道沙坝与河岸高度之比决定了河岸侵蚀率

IF 3.5 2区 地球科学 Q1 GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Takuya Inoue, Yuki Hiramatsu, Joel P. L. Johnson, Junya Dempo, Jagriti Mishra
{"title":"河道沙坝与河岸高度之比决定了河岸侵蚀率","authors":"Takuya Inoue,&nbsp;Yuki Hiramatsu,&nbsp;Joel P. L. Johnson,&nbsp;Junya Dempo,&nbsp;Jagriti Mishra","doi":"10.1029/2024JF007965","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>River channel changes during floods, including bank erosion and bar deposition, are difficult to predict but important for infrastructure, river management, and riparian zone health. Upstream dams can also drive disequilibrium changes to channel morphology, potentially changing bar and bank susceptibility to flooding. To understand feedback between bar morphology, flood flow, bank erosion and channel cross-sectional evolution, we (a) evaluate how bank erosion during natural floods in six gravel-bed rivers with alternate and/or mid-channel bars varied with bar and bank height, and (b) conduct laboratory experiments scaled to the Chubetsu River in Japan, a pseudo-meandering gravel-bed river that has experienced bank erosion influenced by alternate bars. The field data show a strong correlation between bank erosion during floods and the bar to bank height ratio measured before the respective floods. We also find that rivers with upstream dams tend to have higher bar to bank height ratios. In the experiments, we systematically vary flood discharge, initial bar height, and initial bank height, and measure bank erosion and bar evolution. We experimentally find that bank erosion initially increases with bar height and flood discharge. As bar height evolves, bank erosion rates tend to converge under different initial conditions. Bank erosion rate increases with decreasing bank height. Because bars in natural rivers tend to not be adjusted to the largest floods, our experimental results and field data suggest that surveyed ratios of bar height to bank height could be used to infer relative bank erosion risks prior to large floods.</p>","PeriodicalId":15887,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface","volume":"130 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2024JF007965","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ratio of River Channel Bar to Bank Height Sets Bank Erosion Rate\",\"authors\":\"Takuya Inoue,&nbsp;Yuki Hiramatsu,&nbsp;Joel P. L. Johnson,&nbsp;Junya Dempo,&nbsp;Jagriti Mishra\",\"doi\":\"10.1029/2024JF007965\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>River channel changes during floods, including bank erosion and bar deposition, are difficult to predict but important for infrastructure, river management, and riparian zone health. Upstream dams can also drive disequilibrium changes to channel morphology, potentially changing bar and bank susceptibility to flooding. To understand feedback between bar morphology, flood flow, bank erosion and channel cross-sectional evolution, we (a) evaluate how bank erosion during natural floods in six gravel-bed rivers with alternate and/or mid-channel bars varied with bar and bank height, and (b) conduct laboratory experiments scaled to the Chubetsu River in Japan, a pseudo-meandering gravel-bed river that has experienced bank erosion influenced by alternate bars. The field data show a strong correlation between bank erosion during floods and the bar to bank height ratio measured before the respective floods. We also find that rivers with upstream dams tend to have higher bar to bank height ratios. In the experiments, we systematically vary flood discharge, initial bar height, and initial bank height, and measure bank erosion and bar evolution. We experimentally find that bank erosion initially increases with bar height and flood discharge. As bar height evolves, bank erosion rates tend to converge under different initial conditions. Bank erosion rate increases with decreasing bank height. Because bars in natural rivers tend to not be adjusted to the largest floods, our experimental results and field data suggest that surveyed ratios of bar height to bank height could be used to infer relative bank erosion risks prior to large floods.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15887,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface\",\"volume\":\"130 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2024JF007965\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2024JF007965\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2024JF007965","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

洪水期间的河道变化,包括河岸侵蚀和沙坝沉积,很难预测,但对基础设施、河流管理和河岸带健康很重要。上游水坝也会导致河道形态的不平衡变化,潜在地改变沙洲和河岸对洪水的敏感性。为了了解沙洲形态、洪水流量、河岸侵蚀和河道断面演变之间的反馈关系,我们(a)评估了6条具有交替和/或中间沙洲的砾石河床河流在自然洪水期间的河岸侵蚀如何随着沙洲和河岸高度的变化而变化,(b)在日本的Chubetsu河进行了实验室实验,这是一条经历了交替沙洲影响的伪曲流砾石河床。现场数据表明,洪水期间的河岸侵蚀与洪水前测量的坝高比之间存在很强的相关性。我们还发现,上游有水坝的河流往往有更高的坝高比。在实验中,我们系统地改变了洪水流量、初始沙洲高度和初始岸高,并测量了河岸侵蚀和沙洲演变。实验结果表明,堤岸侵蚀最初随着坝高和洪流量的增加而增加。在不同初始条件下,随着坝高的变化,河岸侵蚀速率趋于收敛。河岸侵蚀率随河岸高度的降低而增加。由于天然河流中的沙坝往往不会对最大的洪水进行调整,我们的实验结果和实地数据表明,调查的沙坝高度与河岸高度的比率可以用来推断大洪水之前的相对河岸侵蚀风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Ratio of River Channel Bar to Bank Height Sets Bank Erosion Rate

Ratio of River Channel Bar to Bank Height Sets Bank Erosion Rate

River channel changes during floods, including bank erosion and bar deposition, are difficult to predict but important for infrastructure, river management, and riparian zone health. Upstream dams can also drive disequilibrium changes to channel morphology, potentially changing bar and bank susceptibility to flooding. To understand feedback between bar morphology, flood flow, bank erosion and channel cross-sectional evolution, we (a) evaluate how bank erosion during natural floods in six gravel-bed rivers with alternate and/or mid-channel bars varied with bar and bank height, and (b) conduct laboratory experiments scaled to the Chubetsu River in Japan, a pseudo-meandering gravel-bed river that has experienced bank erosion influenced by alternate bars. The field data show a strong correlation between bank erosion during floods and the bar to bank height ratio measured before the respective floods. We also find that rivers with upstream dams tend to have higher bar to bank height ratios. In the experiments, we systematically vary flood discharge, initial bar height, and initial bank height, and measure bank erosion and bar evolution. We experimentally find that bank erosion initially increases with bar height and flood discharge. As bar height evolves, bank erosion rates tend to converge under different initial conditions. Bank erosion rate increases with decreasing bank height. Because bars in natural rivers tend to not be adjusted to the largest floods, our experimental results and field data suggest that surveyed ratios of bar height to bank height could be used to infer relative bank erosion risks prior to large floods.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface
Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface Earth and Planetary Sciences-Earth-Surface Processes
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
10.30%
发文量
162
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信