工艺-技术契合决策:来自专家小组和案例研究的证据

IF 1.7 4区 计算机科学 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING
Tahir Ahmad, Amy Van Looy
{"title":"工艺-技术契合决策:来自专家小组和案例研究的证据","authors":"Tahir Ahmad,&nbsp;Amy Van Looy","doi":"10.1002/smr.70000","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Business process management (BPM) combined with new technologies can trigger both incremental and disruptive improvements in how organizations operate. More specifically, today's fourth industrial revolution can bring rapid changes in an organization's process dynamics. Our study explores differences between possible process-technology “fit” and “unfit” situations in BPM innovative projects. We extend relevant past studies and theories using a mix of qualitative techniques consisting of expert panel interviews and a case design using two field studies. Our findings reveal that, although alternative process-technology “fit” and “no-fit” situations exist, elements such as creativity, efficiency, integration, user friendliness, and proper task monitoring turn out to be the most promising factors to gain a process-technology fit. Novelty in our work includes discovering “fit” and “no-fit” factors in terms of process-technology alignment, and the development of a decision framework with a generic set of suggestions for BPM practitioners and decision makers. Our mixed-method approach is based on qualitative results by emphasizing in-depth insights and lessons learned rather than building a generalizable theory. We intend to guide managers and decision makers to help them think about possible directions, as suggested by our experts and case participants at the time of their technology adoption in a BPM context.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48898,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Software-Evolution and Process","volume":"37 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Process-Technology Fit Decisions: Evidence From an Expert Panel and Case Studies\",\"authors\":\"Tahir Ahmad,&nbsp;Amy Van Looy\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/smr.70000\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>Business process management (BPM) combined with new technologies can trigger both incremental and disruptive improvements in how organizations operate. More specifically, today's fourth industrial revolution can bring rapid changes in an organization's process dynamics. Our study explores differences between possible process-technology “fit” and “unfit” situations in BPM innovative projects. We extend relevant past studies and theories using a mix of qualitative techniques consisting of expert panel interviews and a case design using two field studies. Our findings reveal that, although alternative process-technology “fit” and “no-fit” situations exist, elements such as creativity, efficiency, integration, user friendliness, and proper task monitoring turn out to be the most promising factors to gain a process-technology fit. Novelty in our work includes discovering “fit” and “no-fit” factors in terms of process-technology alignment, and the development of a decision framework with a generic set of suggestions for BPM practitioners and decision makers. Our mixed-method approach is based on qualitative results by emphasizing in-depth insights and lessons learned rather than building a generalizable theory. We intend to guide managers and decision makers to help them think about possible directions, as suggested by our experts and case participants at the time of their technology adoption in a BPM context.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48898,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Software-Evolution and Process\",\"volume\":\"37 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Software-Evolution and Process\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/smr.70000\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Software-Evolution and Process","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/smr.70000","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

与新技术相结合的业务流程管理(BPM)可以触发组织运作方式的增量和破坏性改进。更具体地说,今天的第四次工业革命可以给组织的流程动态带来快速变化。我们的研究探讨了BPM创新项目中可能的流程技术“适合”和“不适合”情况之间的差异。我们使用由专家小组访谈和使用两个实地研究的案例设计组成的定性技术来扩展相关的过去研究和理论。我们的研究结果表明,尽管存在可选择的过程技术“适合”和“不适合”的情况,但创造力、效率、集成、用户友好性和适当的任务监控等因素被证明是获得过程技术适合的最有希望的因素。我们工作中的新奇之处包括发现流程技术一致性方面的“适合”和“不适合”因素,以及为BPM从业者和决策者开发具有通用建议集的决策框架。我们的混合方法是基于定性的结果,强调深入的见解和经验教训,而不是建立一个概括的理论。我们打算指导管理人员和决策者,帮助他们考虑可能的方向,正如我们的专家和案例参与者在BPM上下文中采用技术时所建议的那样。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Process-Technology Fit Decisions: Evidence From an Expert Panel and Case Studies

Business process management (BPM) combined with new technologies can trigger both incremental and disruptive improvements in how organizations operate. More specifically, today's fourth industrial revolution can bring rapid changes in an organization's process dynamics. Our study explores differences between possible process-technology “fit” and “unfit” situations in BPM innovative projects. We extend relevant past studies and theories using a mix of qualitative techniques consisting of expert panel interviews and a case design using two field studies. Our findings reveal that, although alternative process-technology “fit” and “no-fit” situations exist, elements such as creativity, efficiency, integration, user friendliness, and proper task monitoring turn out to be the most promising factors to gain a process-technology fit. Novelty in our work includes discovering “fit” and “no-fit” factors in terms of process-technology alignment, and the development of a decision framework with a generic set of suggestions for BPM practitioners and decision makers. Our mixed-method approach is based on qualitative results by emphasizing in-depth insights and lessons learned rather than building a generalizable theory. We intend to guide managers and decision makers to help them think about possible directions, as suggested by our experts and case participants at the time of their technology adoption in a BPM context.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Software-Evolution and Process
Journal of Software-Evolution and Process COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING-
自引率
10.00%
发文量
109
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信