加拿大阿尔伯塔落基山脉南部的山地季节和海拔降水梯度

IF 3.2 3区 地球科学 Q1 Environmental Science
Celeste Barnes, Ryan J. MacDonald, Chris Hopkinson
{"title":"加拿大阿尔伯塔落基山脉南部的山地季节和海拔降水梯度","authors":"Celeste Barnes,&nbsp;Ryan J. MacDonald,&nbsp;Chris Hopkinson","doi":"10.1002/hyp.70061","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Modelling precipitation inputs in mountainous terrain is challenging for water resource managers given sparse monitoring sites and complex physical hydroclimatic processes. Government of Alberta weather station uncorrected and bias-corrected precipitation datasets were used to examine elevational precipitation gradients (EPGs) and seasonality of EPGs for six South-Saskatchewan River headwater sites (alpine, sub-alpine, valley). January EPG from valley to alpine sites (730 m elevation difference) using uncorrected precipitation was 19 mm/100 m. Corrected EPG was approximately three times greater (61 mm/100 m). The valley received more precipitation than the alpine (inverse EPG) in late spring and summer. A seasonal signal was present whereby all sites demonstrated 50%–70% lower summertime precipitation relative to winter months, with the greatest seasonal variance at the alpine site. Winter watershed-level spatialized precipitation volume was compared to modelled snow water equivalent (SWE) associated with two late-winter airborne lidar surveys. Uncorrected volumes (2020: 64.0 × 10<sup>6</sup>m<sup>3</sup>, 2021: 63.2 × 10<sup>6</sup>m<sup>3</sup>) were slightly higher than modelled mean SWE (2020: 51.6 × 10<sup>6</sup>m<sup>3</sup>, 2021: 44.2 × 10<sup>6</sup>m<sup>3</sup>) whereas bias-corrected (2020: 120.5 × 10<sup>6</sup>m<sup>3</sup>, 2021: 119.7 × 10<sup>6</sup>m<sup>3</sup>) almost doubled the estimate. Corrected precipitation is assumed closer to the true value. Cumulative sublimation, evaporation and snowmelt losses result in ground-level snowpack yield that deviates from total atmospheric precipitation in an increasingly negative manner. The 2020/2021 simulations suggest wintertime atmospheric precipitation exceeds late-winter snowpack accumulation by up to 57% and 63%, respectively. A loss of 16 × 10<sup>6</sup>m<sup>3</sup> (7%) watershed SWE from the alpine zone was partially attributed to redistribution downslope to the treeline-ecotone. Physical snowpack losses from sublimation and melt, or modelling uncertainty due to precipitation correction and alpine snow-density uncertainties can also contribute to observed discrepancies between in situ SWE and cumulative precipitation. Ignoring bias-correction in headwater precipitation estimates can greatly impact headwater precipitation volume estimates and ignoring EPG seasonality is likely to result in under-estimated winter and over-estimated summer yields.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":13189,"journal":{"name":"Hydrological Processes","volume":"39 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/hyp.70061","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Montane Seasonal and Elevational Precipitation Gradients in the Southern Rockies of Alberta, Canada\",\"authors\":\"Celeste Barnes,&nbsp;Ryan J. MacDonald,&nbsp;Chris Hopkinson\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/hyp.70061\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>Modelling precipitation inputs in mountainous terrain is challenging for water resource managers given sparse monitoring sites and complex physical hydroclimatic processes. Government of Alberta weather station uncorrected and bias-corrected precipitation datasets were used to examine elevational precipitation gradients (EPGs) and seasonality of EPGs for six South-Saskatchewan River headwater sites (alpine, sub-alpine, valley). January EPG from valley to alpine sites (730 m elevation difference) using uncorrected precipitation was 19 mm/100 m. Corrected EPG was approximately three times greater (61 mm/100 m). The valley received more precipitation than the alpine (inverse EPG) in late spring and summer. A seasonal signal was present whereby all sites demonstrated 50%–70% lower summertime precipitation relative to winter months, with the greatest seasonal variance at the alpine site. Winter watershed-level spatialized precipitation volume was compared to modelled snow water equivalent (SWE) associated with two late-winter airborne lidar surveys. Uncorrected volumes (2020: 64.0 × 10<sup>6</sup>m<sup>3</sup>, 2021: 63.2 × 10<sup>6</sup>m<sup>3</sup>) were slightly higher than modelled mean SWE (2020: 51.6 × 10<sup>6</sup>m<sup>3</sup>, 2021: 44.2 × 10<sup>6</sup>m<sup>3</sup>) whereas bias-corrected (2020: 120.5 × 10<sup>6</sup>m<sup>3</sup>, 2021: 119.7 × 10<sup>6</sup>m<sup>3</sup>) almost doubled the estimate. Corrected precipitation is assumed closer to the true value. Cumulative sublimation, evaporation and snowmelt losses result in ground-level snowpack yield that deviates from total atmospheric precipitation in an increasingly negative manner. The 2020/2021 simulations suggest wintertime atmospheric precipitation exceeds late-winter snowpack accumulation by up to 57% and 63%, respectively. A loss of 16 × 10<sup>6</sup>m<sup>3</sup> (7%) watershed SWE from the alpine zone was partially attributed to redistribution downslope to the treeline-ecotone. Physical snowpack losses from sublimation and melt, or modelling uncertainty due to precipitation correction and alpine snow-density uncertainties can also contribute to observed discrepancies between in situ SWE and cumulative precipitation. Ignoring bias-correction in headwater precipitation estimates can greatly impact headwater precipitation volume estimates and ignoring EPG seasonality is likely to result in under-estimated winter and over-estimated summer yields.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13189,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hydrological Processes\",\"volume\":\"39 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/hyp.70061\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hydrological Processes\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hyp.70061\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Environmental Science\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hydrological Processes","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hyp.70061","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Environmental Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

由于监测地点稀疏,水文气候过程复杂,山区降水输入建模对水资源管理人员来说具有挑战性。利用艾伯塔省政府气象站未经校正和偏差校正的降水数据集,对南萨斯喀彻温河6个源头(高山、亚高山和山谷)的海拔高度降水梯度(EPGs)和季节特征进行了研究。利用未校正的降水,1月从山谷到高山站点(高差730 m)的EPG为19 mm/100 m。校正后的EPG大约是原来的三倍(61 mm/100 m)。春末和夏季,河谷降水多于高山降水(反向EPG)。所有站点的夏季降水都比冬季少50%-70%,其中高山站点的季节性差异最大。将冬季流域空间化降水量与两次冬末机载激光雷达调查的模拟雪水当量(SWE)进行了比较。未校正体积(2020年:64.0 × 106m3, 2021年:63.2 × 106m3)略高于模拟的平均SWE(2020年:51.6 × 106m3, 2021年:44.2 × 106m3),而偏差校正(2020年:120.5 × 106m3, 2021年:119.7 × 106m3)几乎是估估值的两倍。假设修正后的降水更接近真实值。累积升华、蒸发和融雪损失导致地面积雪量以越来越负的方式偏离大气总降水。2020/2021年的模拟表明,冬季大气降水分别比冬末积雪积累高出57%和63%。高寒区流域SWE损失16 × 106m3(7%),部分原因是向林带-过渡带的下坡再分配。由于升华和融化造成的物理积雪损失,或由于降水校正和高山积雪密度的不确定性造成的模式不确定性也可能导致观测到的原位SWE与累积降水之间的差异。忽略水源降水估计的偏差校正会极大地影响水源降水量的估计,而忽略EPG的季节性可能会导致低估冬季产量和高估夏季产量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Montane Seasonal and Elevational Precipitation Gradients in the Southern Rockies of Alberta, Canada

Modelling precipitation inputs in mountainous terrain is challenging for water resource managers given sparse monitoring sites and complex physical hydroclimatic processes. Government of Alberta weather station uncorrected and bias-corrected precipitation datasets were used to examine elevational precipitation gradients (EPGs) and seasonality of EPGs for six South-Saskatchewan River headwater sites (alpine, sub-alpine, valley). January EPG from valley to alpine sites (730 m elevation difference) using uncorrected precipitation was 19 mm/100 m. Corrected EPG was approximately three times greater (61 mm/100 m). The valley received more precipitation than the alpine (inverse EPG) in late spring and summer. A seasonal signal was present whereby all sites demonstrated 50%–70% lower summertime precipitation relative to winter months, with the greatest seasonal variance at the alpine site. Winter watershed-level spatialized precipitation volume was compared to modelled snow water equivalent (SWE) associated with two late-winter airborne lidar surveys. Uncorrected volumes (2020: 64.0 × 106m3, 2021: 63.2 × 106m3) were slightly higher than modelled mean SWE (2020: 51.6 × 106m3, 2021: 44.2 × 106m3) whereas bias-corrected (2020: 120.5 × 106m3, 2021: 119.7 × 106m3) almost doubled the estimate. Corrected precipitation is assumed closer to the true value. Cumulative sublimation, evaporation and snowmelt losses result in ground-level snowpack yield that deviates from total atmospheric precipitation in an increasingly negative manner. The 2020/2021 simulations suggest wintertime atmospheric precipitation exceeds late-winter snowpack accumulation by up to 57% and 63%, respectively. A loss of 16 × 106m3 (7%) watershed SWE from the alpine zone was partially attributed to redistribution downslope to the treeline-ecotone. Physical snowpack losses from sublimation and melt, or modelling uncertainty due to precipitation correction and alpine snow-density uncertainties can also contribute to observed discrepancies between in situ SWE and cumulative precipitation. Ignoring bias-correction in headwater precipitation estimates can greatly impact headwater precipitation volume estimates and ignoring EPG seasonality is likely to result in under-estimated winter and over-estimated summer yields.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Hydrological Processes
Hydrological Processes 环境科学-水资源
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
12.50%
发文量
313
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Hydrological Processes is an international journal that publishes original scientific papers advancing understanding of the mechanisms underlying the movement and storage of water in the environment, and the interaction of water with geological, biogeochemical, atmospheric and ecological systems. Not all papers related to water resources are appropriate for submission to this journal; rather we seek papers that clearly articulate the role(s) of hydrological processes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信