重新思考自闭症的心理干预:走向神经多样性肯定的方法

IF 1.2 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Sandra Graf-Kurtulus, Omar C. G. Gelo
{"title":"重新思考自闭症的心理干预:走向神经多样性肯定的方法","authors":"Sandra Graf-Kurtulus,&nbsp;Omar C. G. Gelo","doi":"10.1002/capr.12874","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Autism is characterised by unique patterns of social interaction, communication and repetitive behaviours, often accompanied by comorbid conditions such as mood disorders and anxiety. Standard psychological interventions, such as applied behaviour analysis (ABA) and social skill training (SST), are commonly used but remain controversial due to their focus on aligning autistic individuals with societal norms.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aims</h3>\n \n <p>This paper critically evaluates standard approaches targeting core autistic traits and explores the therapeutic potential of prioritising comorbidities coherently with neurodiversity-affirming strategies.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Materials and Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A critical analysis of clinical and empirical literature was conducted to evaluate the efficacy, ethical issues and broader implications of interventions such as ABA and SST. Particular emphasis was placed on synthesising findings relevant to mental health outcomes, autistic identity formation and the potential of neurodiversity-affirming interventions to reduce distress and promote well-being.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Standard approaches often contribute to adverse effects, such as social camouflaging and increased mental health challenges. Conversely, interventions addressing comorbid conditions such as depression and anxiety, combined with neurodiversity-affirming strategies that support autistic identity and adapt the environment, demonstrate improved mental health outcomes and greater self-acceptance.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Discussion</h3>\n \n <p>We highlight the importance of shifting the therapeutic focus from modifying core autistic traits to addressing comorbidities while fostering a coherent autistic identity. Such a dual approach aligns with the neurodiversity paradigm and emphasises the need for interventions that enhance well-being by reducing distress caused by comorbid conditions without suppressing autistic characteristics.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Prioritising comorbid conditions while fostering autistic identity through neurodiversity-affirming strategies offers a more ethical and effective approach to improving mental health and self-acceptance in autistic individuals. This dual approach advocates for therapeutic practices that align with their well-being and identity.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":46997,"journal":{"name":"Counselling & Psychotherapy Research","volume":"25 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/capr.12874","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Rethinking psychological interventions in autism: Toward a neurodiversity-affirming approach\",\"authors\":\"Sandra Graf-Kurtulus,&nbsp;Omar C. G. Gelo\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/capr.12874\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Autism is characterised by unique patterns of social interaction, communication and repetitive behaviours, often accompanied by comorbid conditions such as mood disorders and anxiety. Standard psychological interventions, such as applied behaviour analysis (ABA) and social skill training (SST), are commonly used but remain controversial due to their focus on aligning autistic individuals with societal norms.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Aims</h3>\\n \\n <p>This paper critically evaluates standard approaches targeting core autistic traits and explores the therapeutic potential of prioritising comorbidities coherently with neurodiversity-affirming strategies.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Materials and Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>A critical analysis of clinical and empirical literature was conducted to evaluate the efficacy, ethical issues and broader implications of interventions such as ABA and SST. Particular emphasis was placed on synthesising findings relevant to mental health outcomes, autistic identity formation and the potential of neurodiversity-affirming interventions to reduce distress and promote well-being.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Standard approaches often contribute to adverse effects, such as social camouflaging and increased mental health challenges. Conversely, interventions addressing comorbid conditions such as depression and anxiety, combined with neurodiversity-affirming strategies that support autistic identity and adapt the environment, demonstrate improved mental health outcomes and greater self-acceptance.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Discussion</h3>\\n \\n <p>We highlight the importance of shifting the therapeutic focus from modifying core autistic traits to addressing comorbidities while fostering a coherent autistic identity. Such a dual approach aligns with the neurodiversity paradigm and emphasises the need for interventions that enhance well-being by reducing distress caused by comorbid conditions without suppressing autistic characteristics.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>Prioritising comorbid conditions while fostering autistic identity through neurodiversity-affirming strategies offers a more ethical and effective approach to improving mental health and self-acceptance in autistic individuals. This dual approach advocates for therapeutic practices that align with their well-being and identity.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46997,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Counselling & Psychotherapy Research\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/capr.12874\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Counselling & Psychotherapy Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/capr.12874\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Counselling & Psychotherapy Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/capr.12874","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

自闭症以独特的社会互动、沟通和重复行为模式为特征,通常伴有情绪障碍和焦虑等共病。标准的心理干预,如应用行为分析(ABA)和社会技能训练(SST),被广泛使用,但由于其重点是使自闭症患者与社会规范保持一致,因此仍存在争议。目的本文批判性地评估针对核心自闭症特征的标准方法,并探索优先考虑合并症与神经多样性确认策略的治疗潜力。材料和方法对临床和实证文献进行了批判性分析,以评估ABA和SST等干预措施的疗效、伦理问题和更广泛的影响。特别强调综合与心理健康结果、自闭症认同形成和肯定神经多样性干预措施的潜力有关的研究结果,以减少痛苦和促进福祉。结果标准治疗方法往往会产生不良影响,如社会伪装和增加心理健康挑战。相反,针对抑郁和焦虑等合并症的干预措施,加上支持自闭症认同和适应环境的神经多样性肯定策略,显示出更好的心理健康结果和更大的自我接受度。我们强调将治疗重点从修改核心自闭症特征转移到解决合并症的重要性,同时培养连贯的自闭症身份。这种双重方法与神经多样性范式一致,强调需要采取干预措施,在不抑制自闭症特征的情况下,通过减少共病条件造成的痛苦来提高福祉。结论通过神经多样性肯定策略在培养自闭症认同的同时优先考虑合并症,为改善自闭症患者的心理健康和自我接纳提供了更为伦理和有效的途径。这种双重方法提倡与他们的福祉和身份一致的治疗实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Rethinking psychological interventions in autism: Toward a neurodiversity-affirming approach

Background

Autism is characterised by unique patterns of social interaction, communication and repetitive behaviours, often accompanied by comorbid conditions such as mood disorders and anxiety. Standard psychological interventions, such as applied behaviour analysis (ABA) and social skill training (SST), are commonly used but remain controversial due to their focus on aligning autistic individuals with societal norms.

Aims

This paper critically evaluates standard approaches targeting core autistic traits and explores the therapeutic potential of prioritising comorbidities coherently with neurodiversity-affirming strategies.

Materials and Methods

A critical analysis of clinical and empirical literature was conducted to evaluate the efficacy, ethical issues and broader implications of interventions such as ABA and SST. Particular emphasis was placed on synthesising findings relevant to mental health outcomes, autistic identity formation and the potential of neurodiversity-affirming interventions to reduce distress and promote well-being.

Results

Standard approaches often contribute to adverse effects, such as social camouflaging and increased mental health challenges. Conversely, interventions addressing comorbid conditions such as depression and anxiety, combined with neurodiversity-affirming strategies that support autistic identity and adapt the environment, demonstrate improved mental health outcomes and greater self-acceptance.

Discussion

We highlight the importance of shifting the therapeutic focus from modifying core autistic traits to addressing comorbidities while fostering a coherent autistic identity. Such a dual approach aligns with the neurodiversity paradigm and emphasises the need for interventions that enhance well-being by reducing distress caused by comorbid conditions without suppressing autistic characteristics.

Conclusion

Prioritising comorbid conditions while fostering autistic identity through neurodiversity-affirming strategies offers a more ethical and effective approach to improving mental health and self-acceptance in autistic individuals. This dual approach advocates for therapeutic practices that align with their well-being and identity.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Counselling & Psychotherapy Research
Counselling & Psychotherapy Research PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
12.50%
发文量
80
期刊介绍: Counselling and Psychotherapy Research is an innovative international peer-reviewed journal dedicated to linking research with practice. Pluralist in orientation, the journal recognises the value of qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods strategies of inquiry and aims to promote high-quality, ethical research that informs and develops counselling and psychotherapy practice. CPR is a journal of the British Association of Counselling and Psychotherapy, promoting reflexive research strongly linked to practice. The journal has its own website: www.cprjournal.com. The aim of this site is to further develop links between counselling and psychotherapy research and practice by offering accessible information about both the specific contents of each issue of CPR, as well as wider developments in counselling and psychotherapy research. The aims are to ensure that research remains relevant to practice, and for practice to continue to inform research development.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信