新西兰原生森林中入侵的非本地植物的低丰富度可能并不反映低影响

IF 4.6 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION
Laureline Rossignaud, Philip E. Hulme
{"title":"新西兰原生森林中入侵的非本地植物的低丰富度可能并不反映低影响","authors":"Laureline Rossignaud,&nbsp;Philip E. Hulme","doi":"10.1111/ddi.13965","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aim</h3>\n \n <p>Identifying habitats vulnerable to plant invasions is essential for developing efficient management programmes. We assessed trends in richness and cover of non-native plants in indigenous shrublands and forests across New Zealand. We investigated whether species classed as invasive species exhibited higher levels of plant invasion than naturalised species and the extent to which this reflected plant life form.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Location</h3>\n \n <p>New Zealand.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Time Period</h3>\n \n <p>From January 2009 to March 2014.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Major Taxa Studied</h3>\n \n <p>Plant.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We analysed 839 permanent 20 × 20 m plots spread across New Zealand that could be classified to a recognised forest type: mānuka-kānuka shrubland, beech, beech-broadleaved, beech-broadleaved-podocarp and broadleaved-podocarp forests. Generalised additive models were run with native canopy richness or cover and spatial coordinates as co-variables in order to compare non-native plant richness and cover across forest types in relation to their invasive status and growth form.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Overall, 35% of the plots had at least one non-native species. Mānuka-kānuka shrubland exhibited the highest mean non-native richness (11 species) and cover (32%) with broadleaved-podocarp forest presenting the next highest invasion level but to a much lesser extent (1.7 species and 3% cover). Despite presenting overall greater non-native richness, naturalised species had lower cover than invasive species (4.2%, 13.5%, respectively). This pattern was mainly related to non-native woody species that, despite their low richness, can reach greater cover than herbaceous species once established.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Main Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Despite half the New Zealand flora being composed of non-native plant species, relatively few were found in forest habitats. However, indigenous shrubland and early successional forests showed higher vulnerability to plant invasion. Woody species, which are overrepresented among invasive species, had higher cover than herbaceous species and were less limited by native canopy cover. Such findings highlight the threat posed by non-native woody species and the need for more targeted management programmes.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":51018,"journal":{"name":"Diversity and Distributions","volume":"31 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ddi.13965","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Low Richness of Invasive Non-Native Plants in New Zealand Indigenous Forests May Not Reflect Low Impact\",\"authors\":\"Laureline Rossignaud,&nbsp;Philip E. Hulme\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ddi.13965\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Aim</h3>\\n \\n <p>Identifying habitats vulnerable to plant invasions is essential for developing efficient management programmes. We assessed trends in richness and cover of non-native plants in indigenous shrublands and forests across New Zealand. We investigated whether species classed as invasive species exhibited higher levels of plant invasion than naturalised species and the extent to which this reflected plant life form.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Location</h3>\\n \\n <p>New Zealand.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Time Period</h3>\\n \\n <p>From January 2009 to March 2014.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Major Taxa Studied</h3>\\n \\n <p>Plant.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>We analysed 839 permanent 20 × 20 m plots spread across New Zealand that could be classified to a recognised forest type: mānuka-kānuka shrubland, beech, beech-broadleaved, beech-broadleaved-podocarp and broadleaved-podocarp forests. Generalised additive models were run with native canopy richness or cover and spatial coordinates as co-variables in order to compare non-native plant richness and cover across forest types in relation to their invasive status and growth form.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Overall, 35% of the plots had at least one non-native species. Mānuka-kānuka shrubland exhibited the highest mean non-native richness (11 species) and cover (32%) with broadleaved-podocarp forest presenting the next highest invasion level but to a much lesser extent (1.7 species and 3% cover). Despite presenting overall greater non-native richness, naturalised species had lower cover than invasive species (4.2%, 13.5%, respectively). This pattern was mainly related to non-native woody species that, despite their low richness, can reach greater cover than herbaceous species once established.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Main Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>Despite half the New Zealand flora being composed of non-native plant species, relatively few were found in forest habitats. However, indigenous shrubland and early successional forests showed higher vulnerability to plant invasion. Woody species, which are overrepresented among invasive species, had higher cover than herbaceous species and were less limited by native canopy cover. Such findings highlight the threat posed by non-native woody species and the need for more targeted management programmes.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51018,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Diversity and Distributions\",\"volume\":\"31 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ddi.13965\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Diversity and Distributions\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ddi.13965\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diversity and Distributions","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ddi.13965","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的确定易受植物入侵的生境对于制定有效的管理方案至关重要。我们评估了新西兰本土灌丛和森林中非本地植物的丰富度和覆盖趋势。我们调查了被归类为入侵物种的物种是否比归化物种表现出更高的植物入侵水平,以及这在多大程度上反映了植物的生命形式。地点:新西兰。时间:2009年1月至2014年3月。研究植物的主要分类群。我们分析了分布在新西兰的839个20 × 20 m的永久性样地,这些样地可以被分类为一种公认的森林类型:mānuka-kānuka灌木林地、山毛榉、山毛榉-阔叶林、山毛榉-阔叶-足草林和阔叶-足草林。以原生冠层丰富度或盖度和空间坐标为协变量,运行广义加性模型,比较不同森林类型的非原生植物丰富度和盖度与其入侵状态和生长形式的关系。结果35%的样地至少有一种外来物种。Mānuka-kānuka灌木林的平均非本地丰富度和覆盖率最高(11种),阔叶林次之,但入侵程度较低(1.7种,覆盖率为3%)。尽管归化物种总体上具有更高的非本地丰富度,但其覆盖度低于入侵物种(分别为4.2%和13.5%)。这种模式主要与非本地木本物种有关,尽管它们的丰富度较低,但一旦建立,它们可以比草本物种获得更大的覆盖。尽管新西兰一半的植物是由非本地植物物种组成的,但在森林生境中发现的相对较少。原生灌丛和早期演替林对植物入侵的脆弱性较高。在入侵物种中,木本物种的盖度高于草本物种,受原生冠层盖度的限制较小。这些发现突出了非本地木本物种构成的威胁,以及更有针对性的管理方案的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Low Richness of Invasive Non-Native Plants in New Zealand Indigenous Forests May Not Reflect Low Impact

Low Richness of Invasive Non-Native Plants in New Zealand Indigenous Forests May Not Reflect Low Impact

Aim

Identifying habitats vulnerable to plant invasions is essential for developing efficient management programmes. We assessed trends in richness and cover of non-native plants in indigenous shrublands and forests across New Zealand. We investigated whether species classed as invasive species exhibited higher levels of plant invasion than naturalised species and the extent to which this reflected plant life form.

Location

New Zealand.

Time Period

From January 2009 to March 2014.

Major Taxa Studied

Plant.

Methods

We analysed 839 permanent 20 × 20 m plots spread across New Zealand that could be classified to a recognised forest type: mānuka-kānuka shrubland, beech, beech-broadleaved, beech-broadleaved-podocarp and broadleaved-podocarp forests. Generalised additive models were run with native canopy richness or cover and spatial coordinates as co-variables in order to compare non-native plant richness and cover across forest types in relation to their invasive status and growth form.

Results

Overall, 35% of the plots had at least one non-native species. Mānuka-kānuka shrubland exhibited the highest mean non-native richness (11 species) and cover (32%) with broadleaved-podocarp forest presenting the next highest invasion level but to a much lesser extent (1.7 species and 3% cover). Despite presenting overall greater non-native richness, naturalised species had lower cover than invasive species (4.2%, 13.5%, respectively). This pattern was mainly related to non-native woody species that, despite their low richness, can reach greater cover than herbaceous species once established.

Main Conclusions

Despite half the New Zealand flora being composed of non-native plant species, relatively few were found in forest habitats. However, indigenous shrubland and early successional forests showed higher vulnerability to plant invasion. Woody species, which are overrepresented among invasive species, had higher cover than herbaceous species and were less limited by native canopy cover. Such findings highlight the threat posed by non-native woody species and the need for more targeted management programmes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Diversity and Distributions
Diversity and Distributions 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
4.30%
发文量
195
审稿时长
8-16 weeks
期刊介绍: Diversity and Distributions is a journal of conservation biogeography. We publish papers that deal with the application of biogeographical principles, theories, and analyses (being those concerned with the distributional dynamics of taxa and assemblages) to problems concerning the conservation of biodiversity. We no longer consider papers the sole aim of which is to describe or analyze patterns of biodiversity or to elucidate processes that generate biodiversity.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信