透过树木看稀树草原:柬埔寨森林-稀树草原边界的植被结构、组成和功能

IF 1.8 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ECOLOGY
Biotropica Pub Date : 2025-01-24 DOI:10.1111/btp.70000
Naomi Schwartz, Jennifer S. Powers, Leland K. Werden, Winslow D. Hansen, Aing Chhengngunn, Luch Phem, Mia Fajeau, Chhang Phourin, Seab Kimsrim, Sokh Heng
{"title":"透过树木看稀树草原:柬埔寨森林-稀树草原边界的植被结构、组成和功能","authors":"Naomi Schwartz,&nbsp;Jennifer S. Powers,&nbsp;Leland K. Werden,&nbsp;Winslow D. Hansen,&nbsp;Aing Chhengngunn,&nbsp;Luch Phem,&nbsp;Mia Fajeau,&nbsp;Chhang Phourin,&nbsp;Seab Kimsrim,&nbsp;Sokh Heng","doi":"10.1111/btp.70000","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In the seasonally dry landscapes of continental Southeast Asia, deciduous dipterocarp vegetation (DDF) and semi-evergreen forests (SEF) form patchy landscape mosaics, with abrupt boundaries between them. DDF resembles savanna, with an open canopy and a continuous grassy ground layer, while SEF lacks grass and has high tree cover and a closed canopy. Alternative hypotheses suggest that these distinct vegetation types are alternative stable states maintained by fire-vegetation feedbacks, that differences in edaphic conditions across landscapes explain their distributions, and/or that DDF are degraded or early successional forests whose distribution is determined by legacies of anthropogenic disturbance. Here, we compare structure, composition, and functional traits of woody vegetation across DDF-SEF boundaries, and ask whether differences across vegetation types are associated with edaphic factors or fire history. We found major differences in vegetation structure and species composition across DDF and SEF, with few shared species across vegetation types. Dominant DDF tree species were not found in SEF, suggesting that DDF represents a distinct vegetation community, rather than early successional or degraded forest. Compared to SEF species, DDF species had lower specific leaf area and higher bark thickness, a key trait associated with fire tolerance. Soil texture and fertility did not differ across vegetation types. Together, these findings suggest that fire, not edaphic factors, likely is the key driver of vegetation at DDF-SEF boundaries. Our results further support classifying and managing DDF as savanna. Conserving the unique biodiversity of DDF-SEF mosaic landscapes will require research to support evidence-based fire management.</p>","PeriodicalId":8982,"journal":{"name":"Biotropica","volume":"57 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/btp.70000","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Seeing the Savanna Through the Trees: Vegetation Structure, Composition and Function Along a Forest-Savanna Boundary in Cambodia\",\"authors\":\"Naomi Schwartz,&nbsp;Jennifer S. Powers,&nbsp;Leland K. Werden,&nbsp;Winslow D. Hansen,&nbsp;Aing Chhengngunn,&nbsp;Luch Phem,&nbsp;Mia Fajeau,&nbsp;Chhang Phourin,&nbsp;Seab Kimsrim,&nbsp;Sokh Heng\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/btp.70000\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>In the seasonally dry landscapes of continental Southeast Asia, deciduous dipterocarp vegetation (DDF) and semi-evergreen forests (SEF) form patchy landscape mosaics, with abrupt boundaries between them. DDF resembles savanna, with an open canopy and a continuous grassy ground layer, while SEF lacks grass and has high tree cover and a closed canopy. Alternative hypotheses suggest that these distinct vegetation types are alternative stable states maintained by fire-vegetation feedbacks, that differences in edaphic conditions across landscapes explain their distributions, and/or that DDF are degraded or early successional forests whose distribution is determined by legacies of anthropogenic disturbance. Here, we compare structure, composition, and functional traits of woody vegetation across DDF-SEF boundaries, and ask whether differences across vegetation types are associated with edaphic factors or fire history. We found major differences in vegetation structure and species composition across DDF and SEF, with few shared species across vegetation types. Dominant DDF tree species were not found in SEF, suggesting that DDF represents a distinct vegetation community, rather than early successional or degraded forest. Compared to SEF species, DDF species had lower specific leaf area and higher bark thickness, a key trait associated with fire tolerance. Soil texture and fertility did not differ across vegetation types. Together, these findings suggest that fire, not edaphic factors, likely is the key driver of vegetation at DDF-SEF boundaries. Our results further support classifying and managing DDF as savanna. Conserving the unique biodiversity of DDF-SEF mosaic landscapes will require research to support evidence-based fire management.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8982,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biotropica\",\"volume\":\"57 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/btp.70000\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biotropica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/btp.70000\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biotropica","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/btp.70000","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在东南亚大陆的季节性干旱景观中,落叶双龙果植被(DDF)和半常绿森林(SEF)形成了斑块状的景观马赛克,它们之间的边界是突然的。DDF类似于稀树草原,有一个开放的树冠和一个连续的草地地面层,而SEF没有草,有很高的树木覆盖和一个封闭的树冠。其他假设认为,这些不同的植被类型是由火-植被反馈维持的不同稳定状态,不同景观的土壤条件差异解释了它们的分布,和/或DDF是退化或早期演替森林,其分布由人为干扰的遗产决定。在这里,我们比较了木本植被在DDF-SEF边界上的结构、组成和功能特征,并探讨了不同植被类型之间的差异是否与土壤因子或火灾历史有关。研究发现,两种植被类型在植被结构和物种组成上存在较大差异,共享物种较少。在SEF中没有发现DDF的优势树种,表明DDF代表了一个独特的植被群落,而不是早期演替或退化森林。与SEF树种相比,DDF树种比叶面积更小,树皮厚度更高,这是与耐火性相关的关键性状。不同植被类型的土壤质地和肥力没有差异。总之,这些发现表明,火,而不是土壤因素,可能是DDF-SEF边界植被的关键驱动因素。我们的结果进一步支持将DDF分类和管理为稀树草原。保护DDF-SEF马赛克景观独特的生物多样性将需要研究以支持基于证据的火灾管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Seeing the Savanna Through the Trees: Vegetation Structure, Composition and Function Along a Forest-Savanna Boundary in Cambodia

Seeing the Savanna Through the Trees: Vegetation Structure, Composition and Function Along a Forest-Savanna Boundary in Cambodia

In the seasonally dry landscapes of continental Southeast Asia, deciduous dipterocarp vegetation (DDF) and semi-evergreen forests (SEF) form patchy landscape mosaics, with abrupt boundaries between them. DDF resembles savanna, with an open canopy and a continuous grassy ground layer, while SEF lacks grass and has high tree cover and a closed canopy. Alternative hypotheses suggest that these distinct vegetation types are alternative stable states maintained by fire-vegetation feedbacks, that differences in edaphic conditions across landscapes explain their distributions, and/or that DDF are degraded or early successional forests whose distribution is determined by legacies of anthropogenic disturbance. Here, we compare structure, composition, and functional traits of woody vegetation across DDF-SEF boundaries, and ask whether differences across vegetation types are associated with edaphic factors or fire history. We found major differences in vegetation structure and species composition across DDF and SEF, with few shared species across vegetation types. Dominant DDF tree species were not found in SEF, suggesting that DDF represents a distinct vegetation community, rather than early successional or degraded forest. Compared to SEF species, DDF species had lower specific leaf area and higher bark thickness, a key trait associated with fire tolerance. Soil texture and fertility did not differ across vegetation types. Together, these findings suggest that fire, not edaphic factors, likely is the key driver of vegetation at DDF-SEF boundaries. Our results further support classifying and managing DDF as savanna. Conserving the unique biodiversity of DDF-SEF mosaic landscapes will require research to support evidence-based fire management.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Biotropica
Biotropica 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
9.50%
发文量
122
审稿时长
8-16 weeks
期刊介绍: Ranked by the ISI index, Biotropica is a highly regarded source of original research on the ecology, conservation and management of all tropical ecosystems, and on the evolution, behavior, and population biology of tropical organisms. Published on behalf of the Association of Tropical Biology and Conservation, the journal''s Special Issues and Special Sections quickly become indispensable references for researchers in the field. Biotropica publishes timely Papers, Reviews, Commentaries, and Insights. Commentaries generate thought-provoking ideas that frequently initiate fruitful debate and discussion, while Reviews provide authoritative and analytical overviews of topics of current conservation or ecological importance. The newly instituted category Insights replaces Short Communications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信