卡塔尔用户对开放政府数据认知的调查

IF 4.3 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Rima Charbaji El-Kassem, Ali Al-Kubaisi
{"title":"卡塔尔用户对开放政府数据认知的调查","authors":"Rima Charbaji El-Kassem,&nbsp;Ali Al-Kubaisi","doi":"10.1155/hbe2/5584496","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study is aimed at evaluating users’ perceptions of open government data (OGD) in Qatar, addressing disparities between the perceived performance and perceived importance of OGD, and identifying the antecedents and consequences of OGD gaps. Data collected from 1426 respondents through a questionnaire were analyzed using multiple quantitative approaches, including importance-performance analysis (IPA)–based strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats (SWOT) analysis; gap analysis; factor analysis; multiple regression; and path analysis. Among 13 OGD attributes, six were identified as opportunities, five required improvement, and two were considered lower priorities. The OGD gap revealed an 82% surplus. Path analysis demonstrated that the OGD gap, combined with two other latent variables, significantly influenced users’ trust in OGD. This study prioritizes areas for improving OGD attributes, aiming to enhance users’ trust in OGD.</p>","PeriodicalId":36408,"journal":{"name":"Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies","volume":"2025 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/hbe2/5584496","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An Investigation on Users’ Perceptions of Open Government Data in Qatar\",\"authors\":\"Rima Charbaji El-Kassem,&nbsp;Ali Al-Kubaisi\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/hbe2/5584496\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>This study is aimed at evaluating users’ perceptions of open government data (OGD) in Qatar, addressing disparities between the perceived performance and perceived importance of OGD, and identifying the antecedents and consequences of OGD gaps. Data collected from 1426 respondents through a questionnaire were analyzed using multiple quantitative approaches, including importance-performance analysis (IPA)–based strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats (SWOT) analysis; gap analysis; factor analysis; multiple regression; and path analysis. Among 13 OGD attributes, six were identified as opportunities, five required improvement, and two were considered lower priorities. The OGD gap revealed an 82% surplus. Path analysis demonstrated that the OGD gap, combined with two other latent variables, significantly influenced users’ trust in OGD. This study prioritizes areas for improving OGD attributes, aiming to enhance users’ trust in OGD.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36408,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies\",\"volume\":\"2025 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/hbe2/5584496\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/hbe2/5584496\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/hbe2/5584496","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在评估卡塔尔用户对开放政府数据(OGD)的看法,解决OGD的感知绩效和感知重要性之间的差异,并确定OGD差距的前因和后果。通过问卷调查收集了1426名受访者的数据,使用多种定量方法进行分析,包括基于重要性-绩效分析(IPA)的优势、劣势、机会和威胁(SWOT)分析;差距分析;因子分析;多元回归;路径分析。在13个OGD属性中,6个被确定为机会,5个需要改进,2个被认为优先级较低。OGD差距显示出82%的盈余。通径分析表明,OGD差距与其他两个潜在变量一起显著影响用户对OGD的信任。本研究对OGD属性的改进领域进行了优先排序,旨在增强用户对OGD的信任。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

An Investigation on Users’ Perceptions of Open Government Data in Qatar

An Investigation on Users’ Perceptions of Open Government Data in Qatar

This study is aimed at evaluating users’ perceptions of open government data (OGD) in Qatar, addressing disparities between the perceived performance and perceived importance of OGD, and identifying the antecedents and consequences of OGD gaps. Data collected from 1426 respondents through a questionnaire were analyzed using multiple quantitative approaches, including importance-performance analysis (IPA)–based strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats (SWOT) analysis; gap analysis; factor analysis; multiple regression; and path analysis. Among 13 OGD attributes, six were identified as opportunities, five required improvement, and two were considered lower priorities. The OGD gap revealed an 82% surplus. Path analysis demonstrated that the OGD gap, combined with two other latent variables, significantly influenced users’ trust in OGD. This study prioritizes areas for improving OGD attributes, aiming to enhance users’ trust in OGD.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies
Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies Social Sciences-Social Sciences (all)
CiteScore
17.20
自引率
8.70%
发文量
73
期刊介绍: Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies is an interdisciplinary journal dedicated to publishing high-impact research that enhances understanding of the complex interactions between diverse human behavior and emerging digital technologies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信