Tianyao Zhang, Youdong Cen, Kaixi Zhou, Lu Zhong, Yerong Zhou, Guangwen Ma
{"title":"不同降雨强度下山坡草地分布格局对土壤侵蚀及沉积物粒度分布的影响","authors":"Tianyao Zhang, Youdong Cen, Kaixi Zhou, Lu Zhong, Yerong Zhou, Guangwen Ma","doi":"10.1002/hyp.70057","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>The distribution patterns of grass cover on arid and semi-arid slopes significantly influence runoff and erosion processes. However, the mechanisms by which these patterns affect hydrological and erosion processes, and the subsequent selective transport of sediment particles, remain poorly understood. To address this knowledge gap, this study conducted rainfall experiments of varying intensities (60, 90 and 120 mm h<sup>−1</sup>) across different grass distribution patterns—random (RP), checkerboard (CP), vertical strips (VP), step strips (SP), banded (BP) and bare slope (BS)—to investigate their effects on runoff, erosion and sediment particle size distribution (PSD). The results show that the BP pattern was most effective in reducing runoff and erosion rates, with reductions of 47.6%–76.5% and 75.4%–84.9%, respectively, compared to BS; SP follows, whereas VP demonstrates the least effectiveness. No significant differences were observed in runoff and erosion rates between the RP and CP treatments. Regarding sediment PSD, the sediments from BS, RP, CP and VP plots predominantly consist of clay and fine silt, accounting for 53.1%–62.8%, whereas sediments from the SP and BP plots are primarily composed of coarse silt (66.9%) and sand (79.2%), respectively. The enrichment of sediment particle size was influenced by the grass distribution patterns. At 60 mm h<sup>−1</sup> rainfall, clay and fine silt from BS plots are preferentially enriched as aggregates, while sandy particles are enriched in VP, SP and BP plots; the sediment distributions in RP and CP plots closely resemble that of the original soil. These findings elucidate the impacts of different grass distribution patterns on sediment PSD and provide insights for the development of grass-planting strategies.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":13189,"journal":{"name":"Hydrological Processes","volume":"39 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of Hillside Grass Distribution Patterns on Soil Erosion and the Particle Size Distribution of Sediments Under Different Rainfall Intensities\",\"authors\":\"Tianyao Zhang, Youdong Cen, Kaixi Zhou, Lu Zhong, Yerong Zhou, Guangwen Ma\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/hyp.70057\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>The distribution patterns of grass cover on arid and semi-arid slopes significantly influence runoff and erosion processes. However, the mechanisms by which these patterns affect hydrological and erosion processes, and the subsequent selective transport of sediment particles, remain poorly understood. To address this knowledge gap, this study conducted rainfall experiments of varying intensities (60, 90 and 120 mm h<sup>−1</sup>) across different grass distribution patterns—random (RP), checkerboard (CP), vertical strips (VP), step strips (SP), banded (BP) and bare slope (BS)—to investigate their effects on runoff, erosion and sediment particle size distribution (PSD). The results show that the BP pattern was most effective in reducing runoff and erosion rates, with reductions of 47.6%–76.5% and 75.4%–84.9%, respectively, compared to BS; SP follows, whereas VP demonstrates the least effectiveness. No significant differences were observed in runoff and erosion rates between the RP and CP treatments. Regarding sediment PSD, the sediments from BS, RP, CP and VP plots predominantly consist of clay and fine silt, accounting for 53.1%–62.8%, whereas sediments from the SP and BP plots are primarily composed of coarse silt (66.9%) and sand (79.2%), respectively. The enrichment of sediment particle size was influenced by the grass distribution patterns. At 60 mm h<sup>−1</sup> rainfall, clay and fine silt from BS plots are preferentially enriched as aggregates, while sandy particles are enriched in VP, SP and BP plots; the sediment distributions in RP and CP plots closely resemble that of the original soil. These findings elucidate the impacts of different grass distribution patterns on sediment PSD and provide insights for the development of grass-planting strategies.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13189,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hydrological Processes\",\"volume\":\"39 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hydrological Processes\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hyp.70057\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Environmental Science\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hydrological Processes","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hyp.70057","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Environmental Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
干旱区和半干旱区坡面草被分布格局对径流侵蚀过程有显著影响。然而,这些模式影响水文和侵蚀过程的机制,以及随后泥沙颗粒的选择性运输,仍然知之甚少。为了解决这一知识差距,本研究在不同的草地分布模式(随机(RP)、棋盘状(CP)、垂直带状(VP)、台阶带状(SP)、带状(BP)和裸坡(BS))上进行了不同强度(60、90和120 mm h−1)的降雨实验,以研究它们对径流、侵蚀和沉积物粒度分布(PSD)的影响。结果表明:BP模式对减少径流和侵蚀速率最有效,分别比BS模式减少47.6% ~ 76.5%和75.4% ~ 84.9%;SP紧随其后,而VP的效果最差。RP和CP处理在径流和侵蚀速率上没有显著差异。在沉积物PSD上,BS、RP、CP和VP样地以粘土和细粉砂为主,占53.1% ~ 62.8%,SP和BP样地以粗粉砂为主(66.9%),砂为主(79.2%)。沉积物粒度的富集受草地分布格局的影响。在60 mm h−1降雨条件下,BS样地的粘土和细粉土优先富集成团聚体,而VP、SP和BP样地的砂质颗粒富集;RP和CP样地的沉积物分布与原始土壤非常相似。这些研究结果阐明了不同草地分布模式对沉积物PSD的影响,并为草地种植策略的制定提供了参考。
Effects of Hillside Grass Distribution Patterns on Soil Erosion and the Particle Size Distribution of Sediments Under Different Rainfall Intensities
The distribution patterns of grass cover on arid and semi-arid slopes significantly influence runoff and erosion processes. However, the mechanisms by which these patterns affect hydrological and erosion processes, and the subsequent selective transport of sediment particles, remain poorly understood. To address this knowledge gap, this study conducted rainfall experiments of varying intensities (60, 90 and 120 mm h−1) across different grass distribution patterns—random (RP), checkerboard (CP), vertical strips (VP), step strips (SP), banded (BP) and bare slope (BS)—to investigate their effects on runoff, erosion and sediment particle size distribution (PSD). The results show that the BP pattern was most effective in reducing runoff and erosion rates, with reductions of 47.6%–76.5% and 75.4%–84.9%, respectively, compared to BS; SP follows, whereas VP demonstrates the least effectiveness. No significant differences were observed in runoff and erosion rates between the RP and CP treatments. Regarding sediment PSD, the sediments from BS, RP, CP and VP plots predominantly consist of clay and fine silt, accounting for 53.1%–62.8%, whereas sediments from the SP and BP plots are primarily composed of coarse silt (66.9%) and sand (79.2%), respectively. The enrichment of sediment particle size was influenced by the grass distribution patterns. At 60 mm h−1 rainfall, clay and fine silt from BS plots are preferentially enriched as aggregates, while sandy particles are enriched in VP, SP and BP plots; the sediment distributions in RP and CP plots closely resemble that of the original soil. These findings elucidate the impacts of different grass distribution patterns on sediment PSD and provide insights for the development of grass-planting strategies.
期刊介绍:
Hydrological Processes is an international journal that publishes original scientific papers advancing understanding of the mechanisms underlying the movement and storage of water in the environment, and the interaction of water with geological, biogeochemical, atmospheric and ecological systems. Not all papers related to water resources are appropriate for submission to this journal; rather we seek papers that clearly articulate the role(s) of hydrological processes.