Derek D. Rucker, Richard E. Petty
{"title":"On the evolution of psychological theory: Advancing from empirical effects to single-process explanations to multi-process models","authors":"Derek D. Rucker,&nbsp;Richard E. Petty","doi":"10.1002/arcp.1105","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This paper presents a framework on the evolution of psychological theory in both consumer psychology and psychology more generally, moving from empirical observations of relationships to explanatory multi-process models. The authors argue that psychological research appears unnecessarily inhibited, at times, to effects-based or single-process explanations of causal relationships. Such approaches, while fruitful for planting seeds of ideas, may limit the growth of psychological research. To provide a path to deeper theory building, involving more explanatory and predictive models, the authors introduce an approach based on the evolutionary stages of theory. This approach involves stating the necessary conditions to advance an evolutionary stage, along with visual examples of theory and empirical examples largely from the literature in consumer psychology. The upshot is a framework aimed to align scholars in understanding how to think about and discuss theoretical contributions. Finally, by adopting this approach, the authors suggest that psychological science can better address current challenges, such as the replication crisis, and foster more impactful research.</p>","PeriodicalId":100328,"journal":{"name":"Consumer Psychology Review","volume":"8 1","pages":"32-50"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/arcp.1105","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Consumer Psychology Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/arcp.1105","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文提出了一个关于消费者心理学和更广泛意义上的心理学理论演变的框架,即从对各种关系的经验观察到解释性的多过程模型。作者认为,心理学研究有时会不必要地局限于对因果关系进行基于效果或单一过程的解释。这种方法虽然能播下思想的种子,但可能会限制心理学研究的发展。为了提供一条通往更深层次理论建设的道路,涉及更多的解释性和预测性模型,作者引入了一种基于理论进化阶段的方法。这种方法包括陈述推进一个进化阶段的必要条件,以及主要来自消费者心理学文献的可视化理论和经验实例。最终形成了一个框架,旨在帮助学者们理解如何思考和讨论理论贡献。最后,通过采用这种方法,作者认为心理科学可以更好地应对当前的挑战,如复制危机,并促进更有影响力的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

On the evolution of psychological theory: Advancing from empirical effects to single-process explanations to multi-process models

On the evolution of psychological theory: Advancing from empirical effects to single-process explanations to multi-process models

This paper presents a framework on the evolution of psychological theory in both consumer psychology and psychology more generally, moving from empirical observations of relationships to explanatory multi-process models. The authors argue that psychological research appears unnecessarily inhibited, at times, to effects-based or single-process explanations of causal relationships. Such approaches, while fruitful for planting seeds of ideas, may limit the growth of psychological research. To provide a path to deeper theory building, involving more explanatory and predictive models, the authors introduce an approach based on the evolutionary stages of theory. This approach involves stating the necessary conditions to advance an evolutionary stage, along with visual examples of theory and empirical examples largely from the literature in consumer psychology. The upshot is a framework aimed to align scholars in understanding how to think about and discuss theoretical contributions. Finally, by adopting this approach, the authors suggest that psychological science can better address current challenges, such as the replication crisis, and foster more impactful research.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信