身体信号整合训练治疗功能性神经障碍(FND)的可行性和可接受性:一个病例系列

IF 1.2 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Krishna Panchmatia, Ellen Poliakoff, Richard J. Brown
{"title":"身体信号整合训练治疗功能性神经障碍(FND)的可行性和可接受性:一个病例系列","authors":"Krishna Panchmatia,&nbsp;Ellen Poliakoff,&nbsp;Richard J. Brown","doi":"10.1002/capr.12876","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>Functional neurological disorder (FND) is a common and often disabling condition, but existing treatments are limited and often do not target relevant underlying mechanisms. This study piloted a manualised intervention package—Body Signal Integration (BSI) training—designed to improve interoception and mind–body integration in individuals with FND. The primary aim was to determine feasibility and acceptability of delivering BSI. A secondary aim was to gather preliminary evidence regarding whether BSI is associated with reductions in FND symptoms and distress.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A case series of BSI was conducted with eight individuals with FND. Baseline, weekly and one-month follow-up self-report measures were completed. Feasibility was assessed by attendance and protocol adherence. Acceptability was evaluated using a self-report measure. Weekly clinical outcome measures were completed.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Seven of eight participants completed therapy with a total attendance rate of 98%. There were no unanticipated side effects or adverse events during therapy. High ratings on all items on the satisfaction questionnaire indicated treatment acceptability. Improvements in somatic symptoms, interoceptive awareness and quality of life were observed in some, but not all, participants. Five participants reported clinically important improvements in interoceptive awareness.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Discussion</h3>\n \n <p>This preliminary study suggests that BSI is feasible and acceptable for use in FND. Clinical outcomes indicate that BSI could improve interoceptive sensibility and reduce experiences of somatic symptoms for some people with FND, but variation in outcomes suggests that the treatment may be suitable for some people more than others. Qualitative process evaluation of the treatment is recommended.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":46997,"journal":{"name":"Counselling & Psychotherapy Research","volume":"25 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/capr.12876","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Feasibility and acceptability of Body Signal Integration training for Functional Neurological Disorder (FND): A case series\",\"authors\":\"Krishna Panchmatia,&nbsp;Ellen Poliakoff,&nbsp;Richard J. Brown\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/capr.12876\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objectives</h3>\\n \\n <p>Functional neurological disorder (FND) is a common and often disabling condition, but existing treatments are limited and often do not target relevant underlying mechanisms. This study piloted a manualised intervention package—Body Signal Integration (BSI) training—designed to improve interoception and mind–body integration in individuals with FND. The primary aim was to determine feasibility and acceptability of delivering BSI. A secondary aim was to gather preliminary evidence regarding whether BSI is associated with reductions in FND symptoms and distress.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>A case series of BSI was conducted with eight individuals with FND. Baseline, weekly and one-month follow-up self-report measures were completed. Feasibility was assessed by attendance and protocol adherence. Acceptability was evaluated using a self-report measure. Weekly clinical outcome measures were completed.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Seven of eight participants completed therapy with a total attendance rate of 98%. There were no unanticipated side effects or adverse events during therapy. High ratings on all items on the satisfaction questionnaire indicated treatment acceptability. Improvements in somatic symptoms, interoceptive awareness and quality of life were observed in some, but not all, participants. Five participants reported clinically important improvements in interoceptive awareness.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Discussion</h3>\\n \\n <p>This preliminary study suggests that BSI is feasible and acceptable for use in FND. Clinical outcomes indicate that BSI could improve interoceptive sensibility and reduce experiences of somatic symptoms for some people with FND, but variation in outcomes suggests that the treatment may be suitable for some people more than others. Qualitative process evaluation of the treatment is recommended.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46997,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Counselling & Psychotherapy Research\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/capr.12876\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Counselling & Psychotherapy Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/capr.12876\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Counselling & Psychotherapy Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/capr.12876","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

功能性神经障碍(FND)是一种常见且常致残的疾病,但现有的治疗方法有限,且往往不针对相关的潜在机制。本研究试点了一种手动干预包——身体信号整合(BSI)训练——旨在改善FND患者的内感受和身心整合。主要目的是确定交付BSI的可行性和可接受性。第二个目的是收集关于BSI是否与FND症状和痛苦减轻相关的初步证据。方法对8例FND患者进行BSI系列病例分析。完成基线、每周和一个月随访自我报告测量。通过出席率和方案依从性评估可行性。可接受性采用自我报告方法进行评估。每周完成临床结果测量。结果8名患者中有7名完成治疗,总出勤率为98%。在治疗过程中没有意外的副作用或不良事件。满意度问卷上所有项目的高评分表明治疗可接受性。在一些(但不是全部)参与者身上观察到躯体症状、内感受性意识和生活质量的改善。五名参与者报告了内感受性意识的临床重要改善。初步研究表明BSI在FND中是可行和可接受的。临床结果表明,BSI可以改善某些FND患者的内感受性,减少躯体症状的经历,但结果的差异表明,这种治疗可能更适合某些人。建议对治疗过程进行定性评价。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Feasibility and acceptability of Body Signal Integration training for Functional Neurological Disorder (FND): A case series

Feasibility and acceptability of Body Signal Integration training for Functional Neurological Disorder (FND): A case series

Objectives

Functional neurological disorder (FND) is a common and often disabling condition, but existing treatments are limited and often do not target relevant underlying mechanisms. This study piloted a manualised intervention package—Body Signal Integration (BSI) training—designed to improve interoception and mind–body integration in individuals with FND. The primary aim was to determine feasibility and acceptability of delivering BSI. A secondary aim was to gather preliminary evidence regarding whether BSI is associated with reductions in FND symptoms and distress.

Methods

A case series of BSI was conducted with eight individuals with FND. Baseline, weekly and one-month follow-up self-report measures were completed. Feasibility was assessed by attendance and protocol adherence. Acceptability was evaluated using a self-report measure. Weekly clinical outcome measures were completed.

Results

Seven of eight participants completed therapy with a total attendance rate of 98%. There were no unanticipated side effects or adverse events during therapy. High ratings on all items on the satisfaction questionnaire indicated treatment acceptability. Improvements in somatic symptoms, interoceptive awareness and quality of life were observed in some, but not all, participants. Five participants reported clinically important improvements in interoceptive awareness.

Discussion

This preliminary study suggests that BSI is feasible and acceptable for use in FND. Clinical outcomes indicate that BSI could improve interoceptive sensibility and reduce experiences of somatic symptoms for some people with FND, but variation in outcomes suggests that the treatment may be suitable for some people more than others. Qualitative process evaluation of the treatment is recommended.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Counselling & Psychotherapy Research
Counselling & Psychotherapy Research PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
12.50%
发文量
80
期刊介绍: Counselling and Psychotherapy Research is an innovative international peer-reviewed journal dedicated to linking research with practice. Pluralist in orientation, the journal recognises the value of qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods strategies of inquiry and aims to promote high-quality, ethical research that informs and develops counselling and psychotherapy practice. CPR is a journal of the British Association of Counselling and Psychotherapy, promoting reflexive research strongly linked to practice. The journal has its own website: www.cprjournal.com. The aim of this site is to further develop links between counselling and psychotherapy research and practice by offering accessible information about both the specific contents of each issue of CPR, as well as wider developments in counselling and psychotherapy research. The aims are to ensure that research remains relevant to practice, and for practice to continue to inform research development.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信