针对奖励回路的经颅磁刺激(TMS)治疗抑郁症患者自杀意念的疗效:两种TMS方案的假对照试验

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Xinyu Huang, Chunhua Xi, Ya Fang, Rong Ye, Xin Wang, Shu Zhang, Yuqiu Cui, Yang Guo, Jingyi Zhang, Gong-Jun Ji, Chunyan Zhu, Yuejia Luo, Xiaofen Chen, Kai Wang, Yanghua Tian, Fengqiong Yu
{"title":"针对奖励回路的经颅磁刺激(TMS)治疗抑郁症患者自杀意念的疗效:两种TMS方案的假对照试验","authors":"Xinyu Huang,&nbsp;Chunhua Xi,&nbsp;Ya Fang,&nbsp;Rong Ye,&nbsp;Xin Wang,&nbsp;Shu Zhang,&nbsp;Yuqiu Cui,&nbsp;Yang Guo,&nbsp;Jingyi Zhang,&nbsp;Gong-Jun Ji,&nbsp;Chunyan Zhu,&nbsp;Yuejia Luo,&nbsp;Xiaofen Chen,&nbsp;Kai Wang,&nbsp;Yanghua Tian,&nbsp;Fengqiong Yu","doi":"10.1155/da/1767477","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n <p><b>Background:</b> Suicide is one of the leading causes of premature death, and dysfunctional reward processing may serve as a potential mechanism. However, effective treatment targeting reward circuits is rarely reported.</p>\n <p><b>Objective:</b> The present study investigated the therapeutic efficacy of two individualized protocols, repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) and intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS), targeting the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (lDLPFC)–nucleus accumbens (NAcc) circuit on suicidal ideation among patients with major depressive disorder (MDD).</p>\n <p><b>Methods:</b> Here, 40 healthy controls (HCs) and 70 MDD patients (MDDs) were recruited for this double-blinded, sham-controlled clinical trial. The reward learning process during the Iowa gambling task (IGT) was initially measured at the baseline. Further, 62 MDDs were assigned to receive 15 daily sessions of individualized rTMS (<i>n</i> = 25), iTBS (<i>n</i> = 15), or sham treatment (<i>n</i> = 22) to the site of strongest lDLPFC–NAcc connectivity.</p>\n <p><b>Results:</b> We found MDDs demonstrated abnormalities in both IGT performance and reward-associated event-related potential (ERP) components compared to HCs. MDDs in the rTMS and iTBS groups showed significant improvements in suicidal ideation and anhedonia symptoms compared to the sham group. The rTMS group also exhibited a more negative-going N170 and feedback-related negativity (FRN) after treatment, and the increase in N170 absolute amplitude posttreatment showed a trend of correlation with improved Temporal Experience Pleasure Scales (TEPSs) and TEPS-anticipatory (TEPS-ant) scores.</p>\n <p><b>Conclusion:</b> The current study indicates that reward circuit-based rTMS and iTBS showed comparable antisuicidal effects in depressive patients, suggesting that the lDLPFC–NAcc pathway may serve as a potential treatment target.</p>\n <p><b>Trial Registration:</b> ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03991572</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":55179,"journal":{"name":"Depression and Anxiety","volume":"2025 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/da/1767477","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Therapeutic Efficacy of Reward Circuit-Targeted Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) on Suicidal Ideation in Depressed Patients: A Sham-Controlled Trial of Two TMS Protocols\",\"authors\":\"Xinyu Huang,&nbsp;Chunhua Xi,&nbsp;Ya Fang,&nbsp;Rong Ye,&nbsp;Xin Wang,&nbsp;Shu Zhang,&nbsp;Yuqiu Cui,&nbsp;Yang Guo,&nbsp;Jingyi Zhang,&nbsp;Gong-Jun Ji,&nbsp;Chunyan Zhu,&nbsp;Yuejia Luo,&nbsp;Xiaofen Chen,&nbsp;Kai Wang,&nbsp;Yanghua Tian,&nbsp;Fengqiong Yu\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/da/1767477\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n <p><b>Background:</b> Suicide is one of the leading causes of premature death, and dysfunctional reward processing may serve as a potential mechanism. However, effective treatment targeting reward circuits is rarely reported.</p>\\n <p><b>Objective:</b> The present study investigated the therapeutic efficacy of two individualized protocols, repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) and intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS), targeting the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (lDLPFC)–nucleus accumbens (NAcc) circuit on suicidal ideation among patients with major depressive disorder (MDD).</p>\\n <p><b>Methods:</b> Here, 40 healthy controls (HCs) and 70 MDD patients (MDDs) were recruited for this double-blinded, sham-controlled clinical trial. The reward learning process during the Iowa gambling task (IGT) was initially measured at the baseline. Further, 62 MDDs were assigned to receive 15 daily sessions of individualized rTMS (<i>n</i> = 25), iTBS (<i>n</i> = 15), or sham treatment (<i>n</i> = 22) to the site of strongest lDLPFC–NAcc connectivity.</p>\\n <p><b>Results:</b> We found MDDs demonstrated abnormalities in both IGT performance and reward-associated event-related potential (ERP) components compared to HCs. MDDs in the rTMS and iTBS groups showed significant improvements in suicidal ideation and anhedonia symptoms compared to the sham group. The rTMS group also exhibited a more negative-going N170 and feedback-related negativity (FRN) after treatment, and the increase in N170 absolute amplitude posttreatment showed a trend of correlation with improved Temporal Experience Pleasure Scales (TEPSs) and TEPS-anticipatory (TEPS-ant) scores.</p>\\n <p><b>Conclusion:</b> The current study indicates that reward circuit-based rTMS and iTBS showed comparable antisuicidal effects in depressive patients, suggesting that the lDLPFC–NAcc pathway may serve as a potential treatment target.</p>\\n <p><b>Trial Registration:</b> ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03991572</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55179,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Depression and Anxiety\",\"volume\":\"2025 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/da/1767477\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Depression and Anxiety\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/da/1767477\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Depression and Anxiety","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/da/1767477","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:自杀是导致过早死亡的主要原因之一,奖励处理功能失调可能是自杀的潜在机制。然而,针对奖励回路的有效治疗很少有报道。目的:探讨针对左背外侧前额叶皮层(lDLPFC) -伏隔核(NAcc)回路的重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS)和间歇θ波爆发刺激(iTBS)两种个体化治疗方案对重度抑郁症(MDD)患者自杀意念的治疗效果。方法:本研究招募了40名健康对照者(hc)和70名重度抑郁症患者(MDD)进行双盲、假对照临床试验。爱荷华赌博任务(IGT)中的奖励学习过程最初是在基线上测量的。此外,62名mdd被分配接受15次每日个体化rTMS (n = 25), iTBS (n = 15)或假治疗(n = 22)到lDLPFC-NAcc连接最强的部位。结果:我们发现,与hc相比,mdd在IGT表现和奖励相关事件相关电位(ERP)成分上都表现出异常。与假手术组相比,rTMS组和iTBS组的mdd在自杀意念和快感缺乏症状方面有显著改善。rTMS组在治疗后也表现出更负向的N170和反馈相关负性(FRN),并且N170绝对振幅的增加与时间体验愉悦量表(teps)和teps -预期(TEPS-ant)分数的改善呈相关趋势。结论:目前的研究表明,基于奖励回路的rTMS和iTBS对抑郁症患者的抗自杀效果相当,提示lDLPFC-NAcc通路可能是一个潜在的治疗靶点。试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT03991572
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Therapeutic Efficacy of Reward Circuit-Targeted Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) on Suicidal Ideation in Depressed Patients: A Sham-Controlled Trial of Two TMS Protocols

Therapeutic Efficacy of Reward Circuit-Targeted Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) on Suicidal Ideation in Depressed Patients: A Sham-Controlled Trial of Two TMS Protocols

Background: Suicide is one of the leading causes of premature death, and dysfunctional reward processing may serve as a potential mechanism. However, effective treatment targeting reward circuits is rarely reported.

Objective: The present study investigated the therapeutic efficacy of two individualized protocols, repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) and intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS), targeting the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (lDLPFC)–nucleus accumbens (NAcc) circuit on suicidal ideation among patients with major depressive disorder (MDD).

Methods: Here, 40 healthy controls (HCs) and 70 MDD patients (MDDs) were recruited for this double-blinded, sham-controlled clinical trial. The reward learning process during the Iowa gambling task (IGT) was initially measured at the baseline. Further, 62 MDDs were assigned to receive 15 daily sessions of individualized rTMS (n = 25), iTBS (n = 15), or sham treatment (n = 22) to the site of strongest lDLPFC–NAcc connectivity.

Results: We found MDDs demonstrated abnormalities in both IGT performance and reward-associated event-related potential (ERP) components compared to HCs. MDDs in the rTMS and iTBS groups showed significant improvements in suicidal ideation and anhedonia symptoms compared to the sham group. The rTMS group also exhibited a more negative-going N170 and feedback-related negativity (FRN) after treatment, and the increase in N170 absolute amplitude posttreatment showed a trend of correlation with improved Temporal Experience Pleasure Scales (TEPSs) and TEPS-anticipatory (TEPS-ant) scores.

Conclusion: The current study indicates that reward circuit-based rTMS and iTBS showed comparable antisuicidal effects in depressive patients, suggesting that the lDLPFC–NAcc pathway may serve as a potential treatment target.

Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03991572

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Depression and Anxiety
Depression and Anxiety 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
15.00
自引率
1.40%
发文量
81
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Depression and Anxiety is a scientific journal that focuses on the study of mood and anxiety disorders, as well as related phenomena in humans. The journal is dedicated to publishing high-quality research and review articles that contribute to the understanding and treatment of these conditions. The journal places a particular emphasis on articles that contribute to the clinical evaluation and care of individuals affected by mood and anxiety disorders. It prioritizes the publication of treatment-related research and review papers, as well as those that present novel findings that can directly impact clinical practice. The journal's goal is to advance the field by disseminating knowledge that can lead to better diagnosis, treatment, and management of these disorders, ultimately improving the quality of life for those who suffer from them.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信