宏观审慎监管、银行稳定和肯尼亚信贷市场

IF 3.1 2区 经济学 Q1 DEVELOPMENT STUDIES
Samuel Kiemo, Anne Kamau, Irene W. Rugiri, Camilla C. Tallam
{"title":"宏观审慎监管、银行稳定和肯尼亚信贷市场","authors":"Samuel Kiemo,&nbsp;Anne Kamau,&nbsp;Irene W. Rugiri,&nbsp;Camilla C. Tallam","doi":"10.1111/1467-8268.12782","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This paper examines the effectiveness of macroprudential regulations in promoting bank stability and the credit market in the Kenyan financial system. The study applies a panel estimation methodology on bank-level and non-bank credit data for the period 2001–2021 to achieve its objectives. The study reveals three key findings. First, overall, the banking sector remains resilient as evidenced by the S-score stability measure. Second, liquidity-related, capital-based, and asset-side macroprudential regulations lower bank stability. Third, there is evidence of dampened bank credit and domestic leakage associated with macroprudential regulations. The paper concludes that macroprudential regulations are ineffective in promoting stability and the credit market. This paper recommends policymakers to use caution when implementing macroprudential conditions. This is to balance out the policy objectives of banking sector stability and access to finance. Additionally, policy makers should be mindful when implementing macroprudential measures that may cause banks to adjust their behavior, leading to domestic credit leakages and cross-border spillovers.</p>","PeriodicalId":47363,"journal":{"name":"African Development Review-Revue Africaine De Developpement","volume":"36 4","pages":"581-593"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Macroprudential regulation, bank stability, and the credit market in Kenya\",\"authors\":\"Samuel Kiemo,&nbsp;Anne Kamau,&nbsp;Irene W. Rugiri,&nbsp;Camilla C. Tallam\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1467-8268.12782\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>This paper examines the effectiveness of macroprudential regulations in promoting bank stability and the credit market in the Kenyan financial system. The study applies a panel estimation methodology on bank-level and non-bank credit data for the period 2001–2021 to achieve its objectives. The study reveals three key findings. First, overall, the banking sector remains resilient as evidenced by the S-score stability measure. Second, liquidity-related, capital-based, and asset-side macroprudential regulations lower bank stability. Third, there is evidence of dampened bank credit and domestic leakage associated with macroprudential regulations. The paper concludes that macroprudential regulations are ineffective in promoting stability and the credit market. This paper recommends policymakers to use caution when implementing macroprudential conditions. This is to balance out the policy objectives of banking sector stability and access to finance. Additionally, policy makers should be mindful when implementing macroprudential measures that may cause banks to adjust their behavior, leading to domestic credit leakages and cross-border spillovers.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47363,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"African Development Review-Revue Africaine De Developpement\",\"volume\":\"36 4\",\"pages\":\"581-593\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"African Development Review-Revue Africaine De Developpement\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1467-8268.12782\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"African Development Review-Revue Africaine De Developpement","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1467-8268.12782","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文考察了宏观审慎监管在促进肯尼亚金融体系银行稳定和信贷市场方面的有效性。该研究对2001-2021年期间的银行层面和非银行信贷数据采用了面板估计方法,以实现其目标。这项研究揭示了三个关键发现。首先,总体而言,银行业仍具有韧性,S-score稳定性指标证明了这一点。其次,流动性相关的、以资本为基础的和资产侧的宏观审慎监管降低了银行的稳定性。第三,有证据表明,与宏观审慎监管有关的银行信贷和国内泄漏受到抑制。宏观审慎监管在促进信贷市场稳定方面是无效的。本文建议政策制定者在实施宏观审慎条件时要谨慎。这是为了平衡银行业稳定和获得融资的政策目标。此外,政策制定者在实施宏观审慎措施时应保持警惕,因为这些措施可能导致银行调整其行为,从而导致国内信贷泄漏和跨境溢出。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Macroprudential regulation, bank stability, and the credit market in Kenya

This paper examines the effectiveness of macroprudential regulations in promoting bank stability and the credit market in the Kenyan financial system. The study applies a panel estimation methodology on bank-level and non-bank credit data for the period 2001–2021 to achieve its objectives. The study reveals three key findings. First, overall, the banking sector remains resilient as evidenced by the S-score stability measure. Second, liquidity-related, capital-based, and asset-side macroprudential regulations lower bank stability. Third, there is evidence of dampened bank credit and domestic leakage associated with macroprudential regulations. The paper concludes that macroprudential regulations are ineffective in promoting stability and the credit market. This paper recommends policymakers to use caution when implementing macroprudential conditions. This is to balance out the policy objectives of banking sector stability and access to finance. Additionally, policy makers should be mindful when implementing macroprudential measures that may cause banks to adjust their behavior, leading to domestic credit leakages and cross-border spillovers.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
24.10%
发文量
60
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信