评估干旱指数在阿根廷农业干旱评估中的表现

IF 2 3区 农林科学 Q2 AGRONOMY
G. Sosa, M. E. Fernández-Long, S. M Vicente-Serrano
{"title":"评估干旱指数在阿根廷农业干旱评估中的表现","authors":"G. Sosa,&nbsp;M. E. Fernández-Long,&nbsp;S. M Vicente-Serrano","doi":"10.1002/agj2.70008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This article presents an analysis of the response of the annual yield of rainfed maize crops in the Argentine Pampas Region to five drought indices (standardized precipitation index [SPI], standardized soil moisture index [SSMI], standardized evapotranspiration deficit index [SEDI], standardized precipitation-evapotranspiration index [SPEI], and standardized precipitation actual evapotranspiration index [SPET]) at different time scales (from 1 to 12 months). The idea of this work was to find the drought indices that best correspond to the interannual variability of maize yield and to use them in monitoring agricultural droughts. For this purpose, we correlated maize yields with different indices across all their time-scales. We selected the indices with the best overall response to yields and then performed a principal component analysis. The findings revealed that the SEDI and the SPEI displayed the highest correlations with maize yields, followed by SPI, while SPET exhibited the lowest correlations. Principal component analysis demonstrated a heightened predictive capacity of drought indices between February and March, particularly at 7–8-month scales, alongside the widely used 3-month temporal scale for monitoring agricultural droughts. The stronger correlations exhibited by SEDI and SPEI, which incorporate atmospheric evaporative demand into their calculations, suggest that water availability is not the sole meteorological factor influencing drought impacts. Atmospheric demand considers temperature and air humidity, factors that intensify plant stress conditions. These findings supported the importance of considering flexible drought indices adapted to different time-scales for accurate monitor of agricultural droughts, which can enhance planning and risk mitigation in crop production in the Pampas Region and beyond.</p>","PeriodicalId":7522,"journal":{"name":"Agronomy Journal","volume":"117 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating the performance of drought indices for assessing agricultural droughts in Argentina\",\"authors\":\"G. Sosa,&nbsp;M. E. Fernández-Long,&nbsp;S. M Vicente-Serrano\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/agj2.70008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>This article presents an analysis of the response of the annual yield of rainfed maize crops in the Argentine Pampas Region to five drought indices (standardized precipitation index [SPI], standardized soil moisture index [SSMI], standardized evapotranspiration deficit index [SEDI], standardized precipitation-evapotranspiration index [SPEI], and standardized precipitation actual evapotranspiration index [SPET]) at different time scales (from 1 to 12 months). The idea of this work was to find the drought indices that best correspond to the interannual variability of maize yield and to use them in monitoring agricultural droughts. For this purpose, we correlated maize yields with different indices across all their time-scales. We selected the indices with the best overall response to yields and then performed a principal component analysis. The findings revealed that the SEDI and the SPEI displayed the highest correlations with maize yields, followed by SPI, while SPET exhibited the lowest correlations. Principal component analysis demonstrated a heightened predictive capacity of drought indices between February and March, particularly at 7–8-month scales, alongside the widely used 3-month temporal scale for monitoring agricultural droughts. The stronger correlations exhibited by SEDI and SPEI, which incorporate atmospheric evaporative demand into their calculations, suggest that water availability is not the sole meteorological factor influencing drought impacts. Atmospheric demand considers temperature and air humidity, factors that intensify plant stress conditions. These findings supported the importance of considering flexible drought indices adapted to different time-scales for accurate monitor of agricultural droughts, which can enhance planning and risk mitigation in crop production in the Pampas Region and beyond.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7522,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Agronomy Journal\",\"volume\":\"117 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Agronomy Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/agj2.70008\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRONOMY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agronomy Journal","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/agj2.70008","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文分析了阿根廷潘帕斯地区旱作玉米产量在不同时间尺度(1 ~ 12个月)对5个干旱指数(标准化降水指数[SPI]、标准化土壤水分指数[SSMI]、标准化蒸散亏缺指数[SEDI]、标准化降水-蒸散指数[SPEI]和标准化降水实际蒸散指数[SPET])的响应。这项工作的想法是找到最符合玉米产量年际变化的干旱指数,并将其用于监测农业干旱。为此,我们将玉米产量与所有时间尺度上的不同指数相关联。我们选择了对产量总体反应最好的指标,然后进行了主成分分析。结果表明,SEDI和SPEI与玉米产量的相关性最高,其次是SPI, SPET与玉米产量的相关性最低。主成分分析表明,2月至3月干旱指数的预测能力增强,特别是在7 - 8个月尺度上,以及广泛使用的3个月时间尺度监测农业干旱。将大气蒸发需求纳入计算的SEDI和SPEI显示出更强的相关性,这表明水分供应不是影响干旱影响的唯一气象因素。大气需求考虑了温度和空气湿度,这些因素加剧了植物的应激条件。这些研究结果支持考虑适应不同时间尺度的灵活干旱指数对于精确监测农业干旱的重要性,这可以加强潘帕斯地区及其他地区作物生产的规划和风险缓解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluating the performance of drought indices for assessing agricultural droughts in Argentina

This article presents an analysis of the response of the annual yield of rainfed maize crops in the Argentine Pampas Region to five drought indices (standardized precipitation index [SPI], standardized soil moisture index [SSMI], standardized evapotranspiration deficit index [SEDI], standardized precipitation-evapotranspiration index [SPEI], and standardized precipitation actual evapotranspiration index [SPET]) at different time scales (from 1 to 12 months). The idea of this work was to find the drought indices that best correspond to the interannual variability of maize yield and to use them in monitoring agricultural droughts. For this purpose, we correlated maize yields with different indices across all their time-scales. We selected the indices with the best overall response to yields and then performed a principal component analysis. The findings revealed that the SEDI and the SPEI displayed the highest correlations with maize yields, followed by SPI, while SPET exhibited the lowest correlations. Principal component analysis demonstrated a heightened predictive capacity of drought indices between February and March, particularly at 7–8-month scales, alongside the widely used 3-month temporal scale for monitoring agricultural droughts. The stronger correlations exhibited by SEDI and SPEI, which incorporate atmospheric evaporative demand into their calculations, suggest that water availability is not the sole meteorological factor influencing drought impacts. Atmospheric demand considers temperature and air humidity, factors that intensify plant stress conditions. These findings supported the importance of considering flexible drought indices adapted to different time-scales for accurate monitor of agricultural droughts, which can enhance planning and risk mitigation in crop production in the Pampas Region and beyond.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Agronomy Journal
Agronomy Journal 农林科学-农艺学
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
9.50%
发文量
265
审稿时长
4.8 months
期刊介绍: After critical review and approval by the editorial board, AJ publishes articles reporting research findings in soil–plant relationships; crop science; soil science; biometry; crop, soil, pasture, and range management; crop, forage, and pasture production and utilization; turfgrass; agroclimatology; agronomic models; integrated pest management; integrated agricultural systems; and various aspects of entomology, weed science, animal science, plant pathology, and agricultural economics as applied to production agriculture. Notes are published about apparatus, observations, and experimental techniques. Observations usually are limited to studies and reports of unrepeatable phenomena or other unique circumstances. Review and interpretation papers are also published, subject to standard review. Contributions to the Forum section deal with current agronomic issues and questions in brief, thought-provoking form. Such papers are reviewed by the editor in consultation with the editorial board.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信