{"title":"利用中大西洋南部海域Statolith年龄-频率数据对未捕捞腹足类(Buccinum undatum)种群自然死亡率评估的修正","authors":"","doi":"10.1002/aff2.70022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><i>Citation</i> Borsetti S, Wiedenmann J, and Munroe D. 2022. “Evaluation of Natural Mortality of an Unfished Gastropod (<i>Buccinum undatum</i>) Population Using Statolith Age-Frequency Data in the Southern Mid-Atlantic Bight.” <i>Aquaculture, Fish and Fisheries</i> 2, no. 3 (May 23): 243–251. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/aff2.47 DOI: 10.1002/aff2.47</p><p><i>Description of error</i></p><p>Incorrect units were used when describing minimum landing sizes, specifically in the Methods and Results sections 2.3 and 3.3., as well as in Figure 4. The correct units for minimum landing size is millimeters (mm), not centimeters (cm). The correct units are reproduced below.</p><p><i>Methods 2.3. Fishing Mortality reference points</i> “Therefore, three selectivity curves were calculated using three different minimum landing sizes (45, 55, and 65 mm) consistent with sizes used in other countries (see Borsetti et al., 2018 for a review).”</p><p><i>Results 3.3. Fishing Mortality reference points</i> “The different minimum landing sizes (45, 55, and 65 mm) resulted in different age-based selectivity curves, with an age at 50% selection of approximately 3, 4, and 6 years old, respectively (Figure 4A). These selectivity curves, combined with the different values of <i>M</i> resulted in a range of SPR-curves and F<sub>40%</sub> values (Figure 4B). For <i>M</i> = 0.45, the F<sub>40%</sub> values were 0.29, 0.42, and 1.40 yr<sup>−1</sup> for the minimum size of 45, 55, and 65 mm, respectively. The corresponding estimates of <i>Z</i> (<i>M + F</i>) were 0.74, 0.87, and 1.85 yr<sup>−1</sup>.Values of F<sub>40%</sub> were higher using <i>M</i> = 0.6, with values of 0.38, 0.6, and 3.2 yr<sup>−1</sup> for the minimum size of 45, 55, and 65 mm, respectively. The corresponding estimates of <i>Z</i> with <i>M</i> = 0.6 were 1.03, 1.25, and 3.85 yr<sup>−1</sup>.”</p><p>The authors apologize for these errors.</p>","PeriodicalId":100114,"journal":{"name":"Aquaculture, Fish and Fisheries","volume":"5 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/aff2.70022","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Correction to Evaluation of Natural Mortality of an Unfished Gastropod (Buccinum undatum) Population Using Statolith Age-frequency Data in the Southern Mid-Atlantic Bight\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/aff2.70022\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><i>Citation</i> Borsetti S, Wiedenmann J, and Munroe D. 2022. “Evaluation of Natural Mortality of an Unfished Gastropod (<i>Buccinum undatum</i>) Population Using Statolith Age-Frequency Data in the Southern Mid-Atlantic Bight.” <i>Aquaculture, Fish and Fisheries</i> 2, no. 3 (May 23): 243–251. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/aff2.47 DOI: 10.1002/aff2.47</p><p><i>Description of error</i></p><p>Incorrect units were used when describing minimum landing sizes, specifically in the Methods and Results sections 2.3 and 3.3., as well as in Figure 4. The correct units for minimum landing size is millimeters (mm), not centimeters (cm). The correct units are reproduced below.</p><p><i>Methods 2.3. Fishing Mortality reference points</i> “Therefore, three selectivity curves were calculated using three different minimum landing sizes (45, 55, and 65 mm) consistent with sizes used in other countries (see Borsetti et al., 2018 for a review).”</p><p><i>Results 3.3. Fishing Mortality reference points</i> “The different minimum landing sizes (45, 55, and 65 mm) resulted in different age-based selectivity curves, with an age at 50% selection of approximately 3, 4, and 6 years old, respectively (Figure 4A). These selectivity curves, combined with the different values of <i>M</i> resulted in a range of SPR-curves and F<sub>40%</sub> values (Figure 4B). For <i>M</i> = 0.45, the F<sub>40%</sub> values were 0.29, 0.42, and 1.40 yr<sup>−1</sup> for the minimum size of 45, 55, and 65 mm, respectively. The corresponding estimates of <i>Z</i> (<i>M + F</i>) were 0.74, 0.87, and 1.85 yr<sup>−1</sup>.Values of F<sub>40%</sub> were higher using <i>M</i> = 0.6, with values of 0.38, 0.6, and 3.2 yr<sup>−1</sup> for the minimum size of 45, 55, and 65 mm, respectively. The corresponding estimates of <i>Z</i> with <i>M</i> = 0.6 were 1.03, 1.25, and 3.85 yr<sup>−1</sup>.”</p><p>The authors apologize for these errors.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100114,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Aquaculture, Fish and Fisheries\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/aff2.70022\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Aquaculture, Fish and Fisheries\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/aff2.70022\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"FISHERIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aquaculture, Fish and Fisheries","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/aff2.70022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"FISHERIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Correction to Evaluation of Natural Mortality of an Unfished Gastropod (Buccinum undatum) Population Using Statolith Age-frequency Data in the Southern Mid-Atlantic Bight
Citation Borsetti S, Wiedenmann J, and Munroe D. 2022. “Evaluation of Natural Mortality of an Unfished Gastropod (Buccinum undatum) Population Using Statolith Age-Frequency Data in the Southern Mid-Atlantic Bight.” Aquaculture, Fish and Fisheries 2, no. 3 (May 23): 243–251. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/aff2.47 DOI: 10.1002/aff2.47
Description of error
Incorrect units were used when describing minimum landing sizes, specifically in the Methods and Results sections 2.3 and 3.3., as well as in Figure 4. The correct units for minimum landing size is millimeters (mm), not centimeters (cm). The correct units are reproduced below.
Methods 2.3. Fishing Mortality reference points “Therefore, three selectivity curves were calculated using three different minimum landing sizes (45, 55, and 65 mm) consistent with sizes used in other countries (see Borsetti et al., 2018 for a review).”
Results 3.3. Fishing Mortality reference points “The different minimum landing sizes (45, 55, and 65 mm) resulted in different age-based selectivity curves, with an age at 50% selection of approximately 3, 4, and 6 years old, respectively (Figure 4A). These selectivity curves, combined with the different values of M resulted in a range of SPR-curves and F40% values (Figure 4B). For M = 0.45, the F40% values were 0.29, 0.42, and 1.40 yr−1 for the minimum size of 45, 55, and 65 mm, respectively. The corresponding estimates of Z (M + F) were 0.74, 0.87, and 1.85 yr−1.Values of F40% were higher using M = 0.6, with values of 0.38, 0.6, and 3.2 yr−1 for the minimum size of 45, 55, and 65 mm, respectively. The corresponding estimates of Z with M = 0.6 were 1.03, 1.25, and 3.85 yr−1.”