{"title":"沙子是影响北卡罗莱纳州未受干扰土地利用中表层土壤碳和氮组分的统一结构成分","authors":"Alan J. Franzluebbers","doi":"10.1002/saj2.70011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Soil organic matter concentrations are associated with soil texture in some but not in all studies. Why there are variable responses to soil texture can have logical reasons, the most obvious of which are inconsistent historical land uses, interactions with climatic and landscape settings, and management variations within a land use. In an evaluation of surface soils (0- to 10-cm depth) under consistently undisturbed land use from 648 sites across relatively narrow climatic variations in North Carolina, large soil texture variations were assembled into structured populations (<i>n</i> = 27) of sand and clay categories (<i>n</i> = 24). Sand concentration varied from 220 to 881 g kg<sup>−1</sup>, silt concentration varied from 67 to 517 g kg<sup>−1</sup>, and clay concentration varied from 47 to 360 g kg<sup>−1</sup> (5%–95% limits). Overwhelmingly, total, particulate, and non-particulate organic C and N fractions were more statistically associated with sand concentration than with clay concentration alone. Sand concentration is the inverse of clay + silt summation and is a necessary feature when determining particulate organic C and N. Soil bulk density and sieved soil density were also more closely associated with sand concentration than with clay concentration alone. This study confirmed there was no saturation limit for the accumulation of non-particulate organic C and N (sometimes labeled mineral-associated organic matter). Therefore, sand concentration should be considered the best indicator of soil textural influence on soil organic matter properties and a key contextual feature necessary for soil health assessments.</p>","PeriodicalId":101043,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings - Soil Science Society of America","volume":"89 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/saj2.70011","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sand is the unifying textural component influencing surface-soil carbon and nitrogen fractions across undisturbed land uses in North Carolina\",\"authors\":\"Alan J. Franzluebbers\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/saj2.70011\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Soil organic matter concentrations are associated with soil texture in some but not in all studies. Why there are variable responses to soil texture can have logical reasons, the most obvious of which are inconsistent historical land uses, interactions with climatic and landscape settings, and management variations within a land use. In an evaluation of surface soils (0- to 10-cm depth) under consistently undisturbed land use from 648 sites across relatively narrow climatic variations in North Carolina, large soil texture variations were assembled into structured populations (<i>n</i> = 27) of sand and clay categories (<i>n</i> = 24). Sand concentration varied from 220 to 881 g kg<sup>−1</sup>, silt concentration varied from 67 to 517 g kg<sup>−1</sup>, and clay concentration varied from 47 to 360 g kg<sup>−1</sup> (5%–95% limits). Overwhelmingly, total, particulate, and non-particulate organic C and N fractions were more statistically associated with sand concentration than with clay concentration alone. Sand concentration is the inverse of clay + silt summation and is a necessary feature when determining particulate organic C and N. Soil bulk density and sieved soil density were also more closely associated with sand concentration than with clay concentration alone. This study confirmed there was no saturation limit for the accumulation of non-particulate organic C and N (sometimes labeled mineral-associated organic matter). Therefore, sand concentration should be considered the best indicator of soil textural influence on soil organic matter properties and a key contextual feature necessary for soil health assessments.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101043,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings - Soil Science Society of America\",\"volume\":\"89 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/saj2.70011\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings - Soil Science Society of America\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/saj2.70011\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings - Soil Science Society of America","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/saj2.70011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
在一些研究中,土壤有机质浓度与土壤质地有关,但并非所有研究都是如此。为什么对土壤质地有不同的反应可能有合理的原因,其中最明显的是不一致的历史土地利用,与气候和景观环境的相互作用,以及土地利用中的管理变化。在对北卡罗莱纳州648个地点持续未受干扰的土地利用下的表层土壤(0至10厘米深)进行评估时,研究人员将土壤质地的大变化组合成砂和粘土类别(n = 24)的结构种群(n = 27)。砂浓度在220 ~ 881 g kg - 1之间变化,粉砂浓度在67 ~ 517 g kg - 1之间变化,粘土浓度在47 ~ 360 g kg - 1之间变化(5% ~ 95%限)。总体、颗粒和非颗粒有机C和N组分在统计上与砂浓度的关系大于单独与粘土浓度的关系。砂浓度与粘土+粉砂的总和相反,是测定颗粒有机碳和氮的必要特征。土壤容重和筛土密度与砂浓度的关系也比单独与粘土浓度的关系更密切。本研究证实,非颗粒有机C和N(有时标记为矿物伴生有机质)的积累没有饱和限制。因此,砂粒浓度应被视为土壤质地对土壤有机质特性影响的最佳指标,也是土壤健康评价所必需的关键背景特征。
Sand is the unifying textural component influencing surface-soil carbon and nitrogen fractions across undisturbed land uses in North Carolina
Soil organic matter concentrations are associated with soil texture in some but not in all studies. Why there are variable responses to soil texture can have logical reasons, the most obvious of which are inconsistent historical land uses, interactions with climatic and landscape settings, and management variations within a land use. In an evaluation of surface soils (0- to 10-cm depth) under consistently undisturbed land use from 648 sites across relatively narrow climatic variations in North Carolina, large soil texture variations were assembled into structured populations (n = 27) of sand and clay categories (n = 24). Sand concentration varied from 220 to 881 g kg−1, silt concentration varied from 67 to 517 g kg−1, and clay concentration varied from 47 to 360 g kg−1 (5%–95% limits). Overwhelmingly, total, particulate, and non-particulate organic C and N fractions were more statistically associated with sand concentration than with clay concentration alone. Sand concentration is the inverse of clay + silt summation and is a necessary feature when determining particulate organic C and N. Soil bulk density and sieved soil density were also more closely associated with sand concentration than with clay concentration alone. This study confirmed there was no saturation limit for the accumulation of non-particulate organic C and N (sometimes labeled mineral-associated organic matter). Therefore, sand concentration should be considered the best indicator of soil textural influence on soil organic matter properties and a key contextual feature necessary for soil health assessments.