心理急救训练(RAPID-PFA)对突尼斯公共机构护生自我效能感、感知能力和备灾能力的影响:一项随机对照试验

IF 2.6 3区 管理学 Q3 MANAGEMENT
Ahlem Mtiraoui, Hayder Mahjoubi, Akram Achour, Mariem Ghardallou, Jaafer Nakhli
{"title":"心理急救训练(RAPID-PFA)对突尼斯公共机构护生自我效能感、感知能力和备灾能力的影响:一项随机对照试验","authors":"Ahlem Mtiraoui,&nbsp;Hayder Mahjoubi,&nbsp;Akram Achour,&nbsp;Mariem Ghardallou,&nbsp;Jaafer Nakhli","doi":"10.1111/1468-5973.70019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This article is an example of ‘Lessons from the Field’. Disasters and emergencies pose unique challenges for healthcare professionals, necessitating a robust response from the nursing community. This study evaluated the effectiveness of a Psychological First Aid (PFA) intervention based on the RAPID-PFA Model on the perceived competencies, disaster management readiness and self-efficacy of nursing students in public institutions in Tunisia. A quasi-experimental study was conducted among nursing students in public institutions in Tunisia, comprising an intervention group (<i>N</i> = 54) and a control group (<i>N</i> = 54). Based on international PFA guidelines, the educational intervention included a 6-h immersive workshop featuring role-playing exercises. Perceived competencies, self-efficacy and disaster preparedness levels were assessed using standardized instruments. Data were collected at four-time points: before, immediately after the training and 1 and 3 months post-intervention. Descriptive statistics, <i>χ</i>² tests and one-way and repeated-measures ANOVA were used to evaluate the training's impact. The study population had a mean age of 22, with no significant differences in sociodemographic characteristics between the intervention and control groups. The majority of students (96.3%) had received physical first aid training, but none had training in PFA. The intervention significantly improved perceived competencies, disaster preparedness, helping capacity and self-efficacy among the intervention group. These improvements were sustained across multiple follow-up points (1- and 3-months post-intervention). Effect sizes were substantial, indicating a strong impact on the training (Cohen's <i>d</i> ≥ 0.8). The findings highlight the crucial role of PFA training in preparing nursing students to respond effectively to the psychological needs of disaster survivors, ultimately contributing to a more resilient and efficient healthcare workforce.</p>","PeriodicalId":47674,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management","volume":"33 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1468-5973.70019","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Impact of Psychological First Aid Training (RAPID-PFA) on Self-Efficacy, Perceived Competencies and Disaster Preparedness of Nursing Students in Tunisian Public Institutions: A Randomized Controlled Trial\",\"authors\":\"Ahlem Mtiraoui,&nbsp;Hayder Mahjoubi,&nbsp;Akram Achour,&nbsp;Mariem Ghardallou,&nbsp;Jaafer Nakhli\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1468-5973.70019\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>This article is an example of ‘Lessons from the Field’. Disasters and emergencies pose unique challenges for healthcare professionals, necessitating a robust response from the nursing community. This study evaluated the effectiveness of a Psychological First Aid (PFA) intervention based on the RAPID-PFA Model on the perceived competencies, disaster management readiness and self-efficacy of nursing students in public institutions in Tunisia. A quasi-experimental study was conducted among nursing students in public institutions in Tunisia, comprising an intervention group (<i>N</i> = 54) and a control group (<i>N</i> = 54). Based on international PFA guidelines, the educational intervention included a 6-h immersive workshop featuring role-playing exercises. Perceived competencies, self-efficacy and disaster preparedness levels were assessed using standardized instruments. Data were collected at four-time points: before, immediately after the training and 1 and 3 months post-intervention. Descriptive statistics, <i>χ</i>² tests and one-way and repeated-measures ANOVA were used to evaluate the training's impact. The study population had a mean age of 22, with no significant differences in sociodemographic characteristics between the intervention and control groups. The majority of students (96.3%) had received physical first aid training, but none had training in PFA. The intervention significantly improved perceived competencies, disaster preparedness, helping capacity and self-efficacy among the intervention group. These improvements were sustained across multiple follow-up points (1- and 3-months post-intervention). Effect sizes were substantial, indicating a strong impact on the training (Cohen's <i>d</i> ≥ 0.8). The findings highlight the crucial role of PFA training in preparing nursing students to respond effectively to the psychological needs of disaster survivors, ultimately contributing to a more resilient and efficient healthcare workforce.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47674,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management\",\"volume\":\"33 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1468-5973.70019\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1468-5973.70019\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1468-5973.70019","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这篇文章是“来自实地的教训”的一个例子。灾害和紧急情况对医疗保健专业人员提出了独特的挑战,需要护理界作出强有力的反应。本研究评估了基于RAPID-PFA模型的心理急救(PFA)干预对突尼斯公共机构护理学生感知能力、灾害管理准备和自我效能的有效性。对突尼斯公立院校护理专业学生进行准实验研究,分为干预组(N = 54)和对照组(N = 54)。根据国际PFA指导方针,教育干预包括一个以角色扮演练习为特色的6小时沉浸式研讨会。使用标准化工具评估感知能力、自我效能和备灾水平。在四个时间点收集数据:训练前、训练后、干预后1个月和3个月。使用描述性统计、χ 2检验、单向和重复测量方差分析来评估培训的影响。研究人群的平均年龄为22岁,干预组和对照组在社会人口学特征上没有显著差异。大多数学生(96.3%)接受过身体急救培训,但没有人接受过PFA培训。干预显著提高了干预组的感知能力、备灾能力、帮助能力和自我效能感。这些改善持续了多个随访点(干预后1个月和3个月)。效应量很大,表明对训练有很强的影响(Cohen’s d≥0.8)。研究结果强调了PFA培训在培养护理学生有效应对灾难幸存者心理需求方面的关键作用,最终有助于建立一支更具弹性和效率的医疗保健队伍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Impact of Psychological First Aid Training (RAPID-PFA) on Self-Efficacy, Perceived Competencies and Disaster Preparedness of Nursing Students in Tunisian Public Institutions: A Randomized Controlled Trial

This article is an example of ‘Lessons from the Field’. Disasters and emergencies pose unique challenges for healthcare professionals, necessitating a robust response from the nursing community. This study evaluated the effectiveness of a Psychological First Aid (PFA) intervention based on the RAPID-PFA Model on the perceived competencies, disaster management readiness and self-efficacy of nursing students in public institutions in Tunisia. A quasi-experimental study was conducted among nursing students in public institutions in Tunisia, comprising an intervention group (N = 54) and a control group (N = 54). Based on international PFA guidelines, the educational intervention included a 6-h immersive workshop featuring role-playing exercises. Perceived competencies, self-efficacy and disaster preparedness levels were assessed using standardized instruments. Data were collected at four-time points: before, immediately after the training and 1 and 3 months post-intervention. Descriptive statistics, χ² tests and one-way and repeated-measures ANOVA were used to evaluate the training's impact. The study population had a mean age of 22, with no significant differences in sociodemographic characteristics between the intervention and control groups. The majority of students (96.3%) had received physical first aid training, but none had training in PFA. The intervention significantly improved perceived competencies, disaster preparedness, helping capacity and self-efficacy among the intervention group. These improvements were sustained across multiple follow-up points (1- and 3-months post-intervention). Effect sizes were substantial, indicating a strong impact on the training (Cohen's d ≥ 0.8). The findings highlight the crucial role of PFA training in preparing nursing students to respond effectively to the psychological needs of disaster survivors, ultimately contributing to a more resilient and efficient healthcare workforce.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
12.90%
发文量
51
期刊介绍: The Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management is an invaluable source of information on all aspects of contingency planning, scenario analysis and crisis management in both corporate and public sectors. It focuses on the opportunities and threats facing organizations and presents analysis and case studies of crisis prevention, crisis planning, recovery and turnaround management. With contributions from world-wide sources including corporations, governmental agencies, think tanks and influential academics, this publication provides a vital platform for the exchange of strategic and operational experience, information and knowledge.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信