工业应用疲劳设计曲线综述

IF 3.1 2区 材料科学 Q2 ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL
Andrea Tridello, Carlo Boursier Niutta, Massimo Rossetto, Filippo Berto, Davide S. Paolino
{"title":"工业应用疲劳设计曲线综述","authors":"Andrea Tridello,&nbsp;Carlo Boursier Niutta,&nbsp;Massimo Rossetto,&nbsp;Filippo Berto,&nbsp;Davide S. Paolino","doi":"10.1111/ffe.14545","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In the present paper, a review on the design curves for safe–life fatigue design is provided. The methodologies available in the literature for the assessment of the strain–life and stress–life design curves have been analyzed, focusing also on the industrial practice for the design of critical components. The low-cycle fatigue (LCF), high-cycle fatigue (HCF), and very high cycle fatigue (VHCF) life ranges have been considered in the analyses. Design curves should take into account the randomness associated with the material parameter estimation and model it in a probabilistic framework. The analyses carried out in the paper have shown that methodologies based on shifting the median curve or the best-fitting curve by a fixed safety factor or a safety factor dependent on the reliability and confidence targets are among the most used. On the other hand, in several research works, more complex statistical models and methodologies, for example, based on the maximum likelihood principle or the bootstrap approach, have been proposed but are less widespread because they require a more complex implementation. The strengths and the weaknesses of the investigated methodologies have been discussed, providing also indications on future research trends.</p>","PeriodicalId":12298,"journal":{"name":"Fatigue & Fracture of Engineering Materials & Structures","volume":"48 3","pages":"1001-1021"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ffe.14545","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fatigue Design Curves for Industrial Applications: A Review\",\"authors\":\"Andrea Tridello,&nbsp;Carlo Boursier Niutta,&nbsp;Massimo Rossetto,&nbsp;Filippo Berto,&nbsp;Davide S. Paolino\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ffe.14545\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>In the present paper, a review on the design curves for safe–life fatigue design is provided. The methodologies available in the literature for the assessment of the strain–life and stress–life design curves have been analyzed, focusing also on the industrial practice for the design of critical components. The low-cycle fatigue (LCF), high-cycle fatigue (HCF), and very high cycle fatigue (VHCF) life ranges have been considered in the analyses. Design curves should take into account the randomness associated with the material parameter estimation and model it in a probabilistic framework. The analyses carried out in the paper have shown that methodologies based on shifting the median curve or the best-fitting curve by a fixed safety factor or a safety factor dependent on the reliability and confidence targets are among the most used. On the other hand, in several research works, more complex statistical models and methodologies, for example, based on the maximum likelihood principle or the bootstrap approach, have been proposed but are less widespread because they require a more complex implementation. The strengths and the weaknesses of the investigated methodologies have been discussed, providing also indications on future research trends.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12298,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Fatigue & Fracture of Engineering Materials & Structures\",\"volume\":\"48 3\",\"pages\":\"1001-1021\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ffe.14545\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Fatigue & Fracture of Engineering Materials & Structures\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"88\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ffe.14545\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"材料科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fatigue & Fracture of Engineering Materials & Structures","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ffe.14545","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文对安全寿命疲劳设计曲线进行了综述。分析了现有文献中用于评估应变寿命和应力寿命设计曲线的方法,并重点介绍了关键部件设计的工业实践。在分析中考虑了低周疲劳(LCF)、高周疲劳(HCF)和甚高周疲劳(VHCF)寿命范围。设计曲线应考虑与材料参数估计相关的随机性,并在概率框架中对其建模。本文进行的分析表明,基于固定安全系数或依赖于可靠性和置信度目标的安全系数移动中位数曲线或最佳拟合曲线的方法是最常用的方法之一。另一方面,在一些研究工作中,已经提出了更复杂的统计模型和方法,例如,基于最大似然原理或自举方法,但由于它们需要更复杂的实施,因此不太广泛。讨论了所调查方法的优点和缺点,并指出了未来的研究趋势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Fatigue Design Curves for Industrial Applications: A Review

Fatigue Design Curves for Industrial Applications: A Review

In the present paper, a review on the design curves for safe–life fatigue design is provided. The methodologies available in the literature for the assessment of the strain–life and stress–life design curves have been analyzed, focusing also on the industrial practice for the design of critical components. The low-cycle fatigue (LCF), high-cycle fatigue (HCF), and very high cycle fatigue (VHCF) life ranges have been considered in the analyses. Design curves should take into account the randomness associated with the material parameter estimation and model it in a probabilistic framework. The analyses carried out in the paper have shown that methodologies based on shifting the median curve or the best-fitting curve by a fixed safety factor or a safety factor dependent on the reliability and confidence targets are among the most used. On the other hand, in several research works, more complex statistical models and methodologies, for example, based on the maximum likelihood principle or the bootstrap approach, have been proposed but are less widespread because they require a more complex implementation. The strengths and the weaknesses of the investigated methodologies have been discussed, providing also indications on future research trends.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
18.90%
发文量
256
审稿时长
4 months
期刊介绍: Fatigue & Fracture of Engineering Materials & Structures (FFEMS) encompasses the broad topic of structural integrity which is founded on the mechanics of fatigue and fracture, and is concerned with the reliability and effectiveness of various materials and structural components of any scale or geometry. The editors publish original contributions that will stimulate the intellectual innovation that generates elegant, effective and economic engineering designs. The journal is interdisciplinary and includes papers from scientists and engineers in the fields of materials science, mechanics, physics, chemistry, etc.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信