{"title":"夫妻之间的信任修复:系统的文献回顾","authors":"Marco Giacobbi, Fanny Lalot","doi":"10.1111/1467-6427.12483","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This systematic literature review aims to summarise the state of empirical research on processes of trust repair in intimate relationships, particularly post-betrayal. It focusses on identifying factors that facilitate or hinder trust recovery. The review adhered to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 guidelines, involving an extensive search of Web of Science and Scopus databases. We identified and reviewed thirteen relevant articles. The review shows that fidelity trust is the type of trust most extensively examined by researchers and probably the most crucial for romantic relationships. Across diverse contexts and frameworks, we highlight five key themes for trust repair: (1) proactive transparency, (2) active monitoring, (3) remorse and accountability, (4) shared activities and (5) clear communication of reasons for the betrayal. We also identify limitations in current research, particularly regarding sample sizes and methodology. These findings contribute to a better understanding of trust repair mechanisms in intimate relationships and propose directions for future research, emphasising the need for more robust quantitative studies and the development of tailored therapeutic interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":51575,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Family Therapy","volume":"47 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Unpacking trust repair in couples: A systematic literature review\",\"authors\":\"Marco Giacobbi, Fanny Lalot\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1467-6427.12483\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>This systematic literature review aims to summarise the state of empirical research on processes of trust repair in intimate relationships, particularly post-betrayal. It focusses on identifying factors that facilitate or hinder trust recovery. The review adhered to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 guidelines, involving an extensive search of Web of Science and Scopus databases. We identified and reviewed thirteen relevant articles. The review shows that fidelity trust is the type of trust most extensively examined by researchers and probably the most crucial for romantic relationships. Across diverse contexts and frameworks, we highlight five key themes for trust repair: (1) proactive transparency, (2) active monitoring, (3) remorse and accountability, (4) shared activities and (5) clear communication of reasons for the betrayal. We also identify limitations in current research, particularly regarding sample sizes and methodology. These findings contribute to a better understanding of trust repair mechanisms in intimate relationships and propose directions for future research, emphasising the need for more robust quantitative studies and the development of tailored therapeutic interventions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51575,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Family Therapy\",\"volume\":\"47 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Family Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1467-6427.12483\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"FAMILY STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Family Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1467-6427.12483","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本系统的文献综述旨在总结亲密关系中信任修复过程的实证研究现状,特别是背叛后的信任修复过程。它侧重于识别促进或阻碍信任恢复的因素。该综述遵循系统评价和元分析首选报告项目(PRISMA) 2020指南,涉及对Web of Science和Scopus数据库的广泛搜索。我们确定并审查了13篇相关文章。研究表明,忠诚信任是研究人员最广泛研究的信任类型,可能也是浪漫关系中最重要的信任类型。在不同的背景和框架下,我们强调了信任修复的五个关键主题:(1)主动透明;(2)主动监控;(3)悔恨和问责;(4)共同活动;(5)明确沟通背叛的原因。我们还指出了当前研究的局限性,特别是在样本量和方法方面。这些发现有助于更好地理解亲密关系中的信任修复机制,并为未来的研究提出方向,强调需要更有力的定量研究和量身定制的治疗干预措施的发展。
Unpacking trust repair in couples: A systematic literature review
This systematic literature review aims to summarise the state of empirical research on processes of trust repair in intimate relationships, particularly post-betrayal. It focusses on identifying factors that facilitate or hinder trust recovery. The review adhered to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 guidelines, involving an extensive search of Web of Science and Scopus databases. We identified and reviewed thirteen relevant articles. The review shows that fidelity trust is the type of trust most extensively examined by researchers and probably the most crucial for romantic relationships. Across diverse contexts and frameworks, we highlight five key themes for trust repair: (1) proactive transparency, (2) active monitoring, (3) remorse and accountability, (4) shared activities and (5) clear communication of reasons for the betrayal. We also identify limitations in current research, particularly regarding sample sizes and methodology. These findings contribute to a better understanding of trust repair mechanisms in intimate relationships and propose directions for future research, emphasising the need for more robust quantitative studies and the development of tailored therapeutic interventions.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Family Therapy advances the understanding and treatment of human relationships constituted in systems such as couples, families and professional networks and wider groups, by publishing articles on theory, research, clinical practice and training. The editorial board includes leading academics and professionals from around the world in keeping with the high standard of international contributions, which make it one of the most widely read family therapy journals.