预测慢性腰痛复发的多维回归模型

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Yilong Huang, Chunli Li, Jiaxin Chen, Zhongwei Wang, Derong Zhao, Lei Yang, Zhenguang Zhang, Yuanming Jiang, Xiaolina Zhang, Bo He, Zaiyi Liu
{"title":"预测慢性腰痛复发的多维回归模型","authors":"Yilong Huang,&nbsp;Chunli Li,&nbsp;Jiaxin Chen,&nbsp;Zhongwei Wang,&nbsp;Derong Zhao,&nbsp;Lei Yang,&nbsp;Zhenguang Zhang,&nbsp;Yuanming Jiang,&nbsp;Xiaolina Zhang,&nbsp;Bo He,&nbsp;Zaiyi Liu","doi":"10.1002/ejp.4793","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Recurrence is common in chronic low back pain (CLBP). However, predicting the recurrence risk remains a challenge. The aim is to develop and validate a machine learning tool to predict the recurrence risk in patients with CLBP by using multidimensional medical information.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This prospective cohort study consecutively enrolled 341 patients with CLBP from two hospitals between 1 January 2021 and 31 December 2021. Patients from both centres were used for model development and internal validation, employing multivariate logistic regression (MRL) along with three additional machine learning algorithms. The multidimensional model (MDM) was used to predict recurrence in the next 2 years and was compared with the widely used prognostic tool, the STarT BACK Tool (SBT). The models' performance in detecting recurrence was evaluated using several metrics, including the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), decision curve analysis, accuracy, sensitivity and specificity.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>A total of 131 patients (38.42%) experienced recurrence. In the MRL model, factors linked to recurrence odds included progressive lower limb weakness, anxiety, mechanical pressure test, number of previous episodes, Oswestry disability index and multifidus proton density fat fraction. For recurrence prediction, the MRL-MDM achieved an AUC of 0.813 (95% CI, 0.765–0.862), sensitivity of 85.2% and specificity of 70.2% in internal validation. In comparison, the SBT for recurrence had an AUC of 0.555 (95% CI, 0.518–0.592), sensitivity of 93.3% and specificity of 17.6%.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>The MDM may predict recurrence in patients with CLBP over a 2-year period, surpassing the performance of SBT.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Significance Statement</h3>\n \n <p>This study found that the STarT BACK tool is suboptimal in predicting the 2-year recurrence of chronic low back pain (CLBP). Our proposed multidimensional machine learning model aids clinicians in identifying patients at high risk for future recurrence of CLBP and in implementing appropriate preventive measures. Given the considerable healthcare resource utilisation associated with the frequent recurrence of CLBP, our novel model provides significant assistance in addressing this issue, demonstrating substantial clinical relevance.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":12021,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Pain","volume":"29 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Multidimensional Regression Model for Predicting Recurrence in Chronic Low Back Pain\",\"authors\":\"Yilong Huang,&nbsp;Chunli Li,&nbsp;Jiaxin Chen,&nbsp;Zhongwei Wang,&nbsp;Derong Zhao,&nbsp;Lei Yang,&nbsp;Zhenguang Zhang,&nbsp;Yuanming Jiang,&nbsp;Xiaolina Zhang,&nbsp;Bo He,&nbsp;Zaiyi Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ejp.4793\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Recurrence is common in chronic low back pain (CLBP). However, predicting the recurrence risk remains a challenge. The aim is to develop and validate a machine learning tool to predict the recurrence risk in patients with CLBP by using multidimensional medical information.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>This prospective cohort study consecutively enrolled 341 patients with CLBP from two hospitals between 1 January 2021 and 31 December 2021. Patients from both centres were used for model development and internal validation, employing multivariate logistic regression (MRL) along with three additional machine learning algorithms. The multidimensional model (MDM) was used to predict recurrence in the next 2 years and was compared with the widely used prognostic tool, the STarT BACK Tool (SBT). The models' performance in detecting recurrence was evaluated using several metrics, including the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), decision curve analysis, accuracy, sensitivity and specificity.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>A total of 131 patients (38.42%) experienced recurrence. In the MRL model, factors linked to recurrence odds included progressive lower limb weakness, anxiety, mechanical pressure test, number of previous episodes, Oswestry disability index and multifidus proton density fat fraction. For recurrence prediction, the MRL-MDM achieved an AUC of 0.813 (95% CI, 0.765–0.862), sensitivity of 85.2% and specificity of 70.2% in internal validation. In comparison, the SBT for recurrence had an AUC of 0.555 (95% CI, 0.518–0.592), sensitivity of 93.3% and specificity of 17.6%.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>The MDM may predict recurrence in patients with CLBP over a 2-year period, surpassing the performance of SBT.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Significance Statement</h3>\\n \\n <p>This study found that the STarT BACK tool is suboptimal in predicting the 2-year recurrence of chronic low back pain (CLBP). Our proposed multidimensional machine learning model aids clinicians in identifying patients at high risk for future recurrence of CLBP and in implementing appropriate preventive measures. Given the considerable healthcare resource utilisation associated with the frequent recurrence of CLBP, our novel model provides significant assistance in addressing this issue, demonstrating substantial clinical relevance.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12021,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Pain\",\"volume\":\"29 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Pain\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ejp.4793\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Pain","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ejp.4793","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:慢性腰痛(CLBP)的复发是常见的。然而,预测复发风险仍然是一个挑战。目的是开发和验证一种机器学习工具,通过使用多维医学信息来预测CLBP患者的复发风险。方法本前瞻性队列研究于2021年1月1日至2021年12月31日期间从两家医院连续招募了341例CLBP患者。两个中心的患者被用于模型开发和内部验证,采用多变量逻辑回归(MRL)以及另外三种机器学习算法。多维模型(MDM)用于预测未来2年的复发,并与广泛使用的预后工具STarT BACK tool (SBT)进行比较。使用几个指标评估模型在检测复发方面的性能,包括受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUC),决策曲线分析,准确性,灵敏度和特异性。结果131例复发,占38.42%。在MRL模型中,与复发几率相关的因素包括进行性下肢无力、焦虑、机械压力试验、既往发作次数、Oswestry残疾指数和多裂肌质子密度脂肪分数。对于复发预测,MRL-MDM内部验证的AUC为0.813 (95% CI, 0.765-0.862),敏感性为85.2%,特异性为70.2%。相比之下,SBT复发的AUC为0.555 (95% CI, 0.518-0.592),敏感性为93.3%,特异性为17.6%。结论MDM可以预测CLBP患者2年内的复发,优于SBT。本研究发现,STarT BACK工具在预测慢性腰痛(CLBP) 2年复发方面不理想。我们提出的多维机器学习模型有助于临床医生识别未来CLBP复发的高风险患者,并实施适当的预防措施。考虑到与CLBP频繁复发相关的大量医疗资源利用,我们的新模型在解决这一问题方面提供了重要的帮助,展示了实质性的临床相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Multidimensional Regression Model for Predicting Recurrence in Chronic Low Back Pain

Background

Recurrence is common in chronic low back pain (CLBP). However, predicting the recurrence risk remains a challenge. The aim is to develop and validate a machine learning tool to predict the recurrence risk in patients with CLBP by using multidimensional medical information.

Methods

This prospective cohort study consecutively enrolled 341 patients with CLBP from two hospitals between 1 January 2021 and 31 December 2021. Patients from both centres were used for model development and internal validation, employing multivariate logistic regression (MRL) along with three additional machine learning algorithms. The multidimensional model (MDM) was used to predict recurrence in the next 2 years and was compared with the widely used prognostic tool, the STarT BACK Tool (SBT). The models' performance in detecting recurrence was evaluated using several metrics, including the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), decision curve analysis, accuracy, sensitivity and specificity.

Results

A total of 131 patients (38.42%) experienced recurrence. In the MRL model, factors linked to recurrence odds included progressive lower limb weakness, anxiety, mechanical pressure test, number of previous episodes, Oswestry disability index and multifidus proton density fat fraction. For recurrence prediction, the MRL-MDM achieved an AUC of 0.813 (95% CI, 0.765–0.862), sensitivity of 85.2% and specificity of 70.2% in internal validation. In comparison, the SBT for recurrence had an AUC of 0.555 (95% CI, 0.518–0.592), sensitivity of 93.3% and specificity of 17.6%.

Conclusion

The MDM may predict recurrence in patients with CLBP over a 2-year period, surpassing the performance of SBT.

Significance Statement

This study found that the STarT BACK tool is suboptimal in predicting the 2-year recurrence of chronic low back pain (CLBP). Our proposed multidimensional machine learning model aids clinicians in identifying patients at high risk for future recurrence of CLBP and in implementing appropriate preventive measures. Given the considerable healthcare resource utilisation associated with the frequent recurrence of CLBP, our novel model provides significant assistance in addressing this issue, demonstrating substantial clinical relevance.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European Journal of Pain
European Journal of Pain 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
5.60%
发文量
163
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: European Journal of Pain (EJP) publishes clinical and basic science research papers relevant to all aspects of pain and its management, including specialties such as anaesthesia, dentistry, neurology and neurosurgery, orthopaedics, palliative care, pharmacology, physiology, psychiatry, psychology and rehabilitation; socio-economic aspects of pain are also covered. Regular sections in the journal are as follows: • Editorials and Commentaries • Position Papers and Guidelines • Reviews • Original Articles • Letters • Bookshelf The journal particularly welcomes clinical trials, which are published on an occasional basis. Research articles are published under the following subject headings: • Neurobiology • Neurology • Experimental Pharmacology • Clinical Pharmacology • Psychology • Behavioural Therapy • Epidemiology • Cancer Pain • Acute Pain • Clinical Trials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信