避风港学校:一项旨在减少年轻人焦虑的校本项目的试点评估

IF 1.2 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Dominique Grohmann, Claire Banham, Silvana Mengoni, David Wellsted, Karen Irvine
{"title":"避风港学校:一项旨在减少年轻人焦虑的校本项目的试点评估","authors":"Dominique Grohmann,&nbsp;Claire Banham,&nbsp;Silvana Mengoni,&nbsp;David Wellsted,&nbsp;Karen Irvine","doi":"10.1002/capr.12873","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>The aim of this study was to conduct a pilot evaluation of a novel six-week school-based intervention (‘Haven Schools’) on young people's psychological wellbeing.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>One hundred and forty-one students (ages 12–16 years) from 11 schools in England attended up to six sessions of the intervention at their school during the day. Psychological wellbeing was evaluated at each session using the overall score on the Young Person's Core-10 (YP CORE-10) outcome measure, and anxiety and self-harm were evaluated using individual questions in the YP CORE-10.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Participants' psychological wellbeing was significantly better at their last session compared to their first session. Anxiety and thoughts of self-harm were also significantly lower in last sessions compared to first sessions. Attendance was good, with 64% attending at least four sessions (<i>M</i> = 3.99 sessions attended).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>The Haven Schools programme appears to have promising initial results; however, further investigation using a control group and longer-term follow up are warranted.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Patient Consent Statement</h3>\n \n <p>This was an analysis of secondary data used to evaluate the programme, and therefore did not fall within the remit required for ethical review. Each school managed the issue of parental consent differently depending on their own rules. One school felt that it was not necessary to get parental consent as they felt it could be a barrier to some young people attending as they may not want their parents to know. However, most schools sent parents of students who indicated an interest an information letter, and asked parents to email the school with consent.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":46997,"journal":{"name":"Counselling & Psychotherapy Research","volume":"25 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/capr.12873","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Haven schools: A pilot evaluation of a school-based programme to reduce anxiety in young people\",\"authors\":\"Dominique Grohmann,&nbsp;Claire Banham,&nbsp;Silvana Mengoni,&nbsp;David Wellsted,&nbsp;Karen Irvine\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/capr.12873\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objectives</h3>\\n \\n <p>The aim of this study was to conduct a pilot evaluation of a novel six-week school-based intervention (‘Haven Schools’) on young people's psychological wellbeing.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>One hundred and forty-one students (ages 12–16 years) from 11 schools in England attended up to six sessions of the intervention at their school during the day. Psychological wellbeing was evaluated at each session using the overall score on the Young Person's Core-10 (YP CORE-10) outcome measure, and anxiety and self-harm were evaluated using individual questions in the YP CORE-10.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Participants' psychological wellbeing was significantly better at their last session compared to their first session. Anxiety and thoughts of self-harm were also significantly lower in last sessions compared to first sessions. Attendance was good, with 64% attending at least four sessions (<i>M</i> = 3.99 sessions attended).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>The Haven Schools programme appears to have promising initial results; however, further investigation using a control group and longer-term follow up are warranted.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Patient Consent Statement</h3>\\n \\n <p>This was an analysis of secondary data used to evaluate the programme, and therefore did not fall within the remit required for ethical review. Each school managed the issue of parental consent differently depending on their own rules. One school felt that it was not necessary to get parental consent as they felt it could be a barrier to some young people attending as they may not want their parents to know. However, most schools sent parents of students who indicated an interest an information letter, and asked parents to email the school with consent.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46997,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Counselling & Psychotherapy Research\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/capr.12873\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Counselling & Psychotherapy Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/capr.12873\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Counselling & Psychotherapy Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/capr.12873","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的目的是对一种新的为期六周的以学校为基础的干预措施(“避风港学校”)进行试点评估,以改善年轻人的心理健康。方法来自英格兰11所学校的141名学生(12-16岁)每天在他们的学校参加多达6次的干预。在每次会议中,使用青少年核心-10 (YP Core-10)结果测量的总分来评估心理健康,使用YP核心-10中的个别问题来评估焦虑和自我伤害。结果与第一次训练相比,最后一次训练时参与者的心理健康状况明显改善。与第一次治疗相比,最后一次治疗的焦虑和自残想法也明显降低。出勤率很好,64%的人至少参加了四次会议(M = 3.99次)。“避风港学校”项目似乎取得了有希望的初步成果;然而,使用对照组进行进一步调查和长期随访是必要的。患者同意声明这是对用于评估项目的次要数据的分析,因此不属于伦理审查所需的范围。每所学校根据自己的规定,对家长同意问题的处理方式不同。一所学校认为没有必要征得父母的同意,因为他们认为这可能会成为一些年轻人上学的障碍,因为他们可能不想让父母知道。然而,大多数学校会向表示有兴趣的学生的家长发送信息信,并要求家长通过电子邮件向学校表示同意。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Haven schools: A pilot evaluation of a school-based programme to reduce anxiety in young people

Objectives

The aim of this study was to conduct a pilot evaluation of a novel six-week school-based intervention (‘Haven Schools’) on young people's psychological wellbeing.

Methods

One hundred and forty-one students (ages 12–16 years) from 11 schools in England attended up to six sessions of the intervention at their school during the day. Psychological wellbeing was evaluated at each session using the overall score on the Young Person's Core-10 (YP CORE-10) outcome measure, and anxiety and self-harm were evaluated using individual questions in the YP CORE-10.

Results

Participants' psychological wellbeing was significantly better at their last session compared to their first session. Anxiety and thoughts of self-harm were also significantly lower in last sessions compared to first sessions. Attendance was good, with 64% attending at least four sessions (M = 3.99 sessions attended).

Conclusions

The Haven Schools programme appears to have promising initial results; however, further investigation using a control group and longer-term follow up are warranted.

Patient Consent Statement

This was an analysis of secondary data used to evaluate the programme, and therefore did not fall within the remit required for ethical review. Each school managed the issue of parental consent differently depending on their own rules. One school felt that it was not necessary to get parental consent as they felt it could be a barrier to some young people attending as they may not want their parents to know. However, most schools sent parents of students who indicated an interest an information letter, and asked parents to email the school with consent.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Counselling & Psychotherapy Research
Counselling & Psychotherapy Research PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
12.50%
发文量
80
期刊介绍: Counselling and Psychotherapy Research is an innovative international peer-reviewed journal dedicated to linking research with practice. Pluralist in orientation, the journal recognises the value of qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods strategies of inquiry and aims to promote high-quality, ethical research that informs and develops counselling and psychotherapy practice. CPR is a journal of the British Association of Counselling and Psychotherapy, promoting reflexive research strongly linked to practice. The journal has its own website: www.cprjournal.com. The aim of this site is to further develop links between counselling and psychotherapy research and practice by offering accessible information about both the specific contents of each issue of CPR, as well as wider developments in counselling and psychotherapy research. The aims are to ensure that research remains relevant to practice, and for practice to continue to inform research development.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信