生物质气化作为加拿大偏远社区小型热电联产技术的可行替代方案

IF 3.1 3区 工程技术 Q3 ENERGY & FUELS
Christoph Schilling, Blas Mola-Yudego, Marian Marinescu, Christopher Gaston, Dominik Röser
{"title":"生物质气化作为加拿大偏远社区小型热电联产技术的可行替代方案","authors":"Christoph Schilling,&nbsp;Blas Mola-Yudego,&nbsp;Marian Marinescu,&nbsp;Christopher Gaston,&nbsp;Dominik Röser","doi":"10.1007/s12155-024-10812-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The use of forest biomass could drastically reduce the environmental impacts of fossil fuel usage for heat and power in remote communities and can provide new opportunities for employment, retaining money inside communities. Here, we present the techno-economic feasibility of alternative gasification technologies for CHP uses in three remote off-grid communities in Canada. The analysis includes different scenarios of fuel price and operation costs, as well as two different feedstocks, wood pellets and wood chips. The results show potential for successful implementation, subject to planning on the specific conditions and location of the community. Power generation costs vary widely depending on the available biomass price, utilization of heat as well the power output of the system, ranging from about 0.25 CAD/kWh to over 1.20 CAD/kW. Economic support for biomass or removal of diesel subsidies would have a significant impact on biomass CHP implementations. The feasibility of the investigated systems is not dependent on the economics or technology itself but (i) availability of quality feedstock, (ii) utilization of heat for additional revenue generation, (iii) the utilization of the systems, (iv) community-driven bioeconomy alternatives and (v) carbon credit opportunities.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":487,"journal":{"name":"BioEnergy Research","volume":"18 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s12155-024-10812-w.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Biomass Gasification as a Viable Alternative for Small-scaled Combined Heat and Power Technologies in Remote Communities in Canada\",\"authors\":\"Christoph Schilling,&nbsp;Blas Mola-Yudego,&nbsp;Marian Marinescu,&nbsp;Christopher Gaston,&nbsp;Dominik Röser\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12155-024-10812-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The use of forest biomass could drastically reduce the environmental impacts of fossil fuel usage for heat and power in remote communities and can provide new opportunities for employment, retaining money inside communities. Here, we present the techno-economic feasibility of alternative gasification technologies for CHP uses in three remote off-grid communities in Canada. The analysis includes different scenarios of fuel price and operation costs, as well as two different feedstocks, wood pellets and wood chips. The results show potential for successful implementation, subject to planning on the specific conditions and location of the community. Power generation costs vary widely depending on the available biomass price, utilization of heat as well the power output of the system, ranging from about 0.25 CAD/kWh to over 1.20 CAD/kW. Economic support for biomass or removal of diesel subsidies would have a significant impact on biomass CHP implementations. The feasibility of the investigated systems is not dependent on the economics or technology itself but (i) availability of quality feedstock, (ii) utilization of heat for additional revenue generation, (iii) the utilization of the systems, (iv) community-driven bioeconomy alternatives and (v) carbon credit opportunities.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":487,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BioEnergy Research\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s12155-024-10812-w.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BioEnergy Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12155-024-10812-w\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BioEnergy Research","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12155-024-10812-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

利用森林生物量可以大大减少在偏远社区使用化石燃料取暖和发电对环境的影响,并可以提供新的就业机会,使资金留在社区内。在这里,我们介绍了在加拿大三个偏远的离网社区使用替代气化技术的技术经济可行性。该分析包括燃料价格和运营成本的不同情况,以及两种不同的原料,木屑颗粒和木屑。根据社区的具体条件和位置进行规划,结果显示了成功实施的潜力。发电成本根据可获得的生物质价格、热量的利用以及系统的功率输出而有很大差异,范围从0.25加元/千瓦时到超过1.20加元/千瓦。对生物质的经济支持或取消柴油补贴将对生物质热电联产的实施产生重大影响。所研究系统的可行性并不取决于经济或技术本身,而是取决于(i)优质原料的可用性,(ii)利用热量产生额外收入,(iii)系统的利用,(iv)社区驱动的生物经济替代方案和(v)碳信用机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Biomass Gasification as a Viable Alternative for Small-scaled Combined Heat and Power Technologies in Remote Communities in Canada

The use of forest biomass could drastically reduce the environmental impacts of fossil fuel usage for heat and power in remote communities and can provide new opportunities for employment, retaining money inside communities. Here, we present the techno-economic feasibility of alternative gasification technologies for CHP uses in three remote off-grid communities in Canada. The analysis includes different scenarios of fuel price and operation costs, as well as two different feedstocks, wood pellets and wood chips. The results show potential for successful implementation, subject to planning on the specific conditions and location of the community. Power generation costs vary widely depending on the available biomass price, utilization of heat as well the power output of the system, ranging from about 0.25 CAD/kWh to over 1.20 CAD/kW. Economic support for biomass or removal of diesel subsidies would have a significant impact on biomass CHP implementations. The feasibility of the investigated systems is not dependent on the economics or technology itself but (i) availability of quality feedstock, (ii) utilization of heat for additional revenue generation, (iii) the utilization of the systems, (iv) community-driven bioeconomy alternatives and (v) carbon credit opportunities.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BioEnergy Research
BioEnergy Research ENERGY & FUELS-ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
8.30%
发文量
174
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: BioEnergy Research fills a void in the rapidly growing area of feedstock biology research related to biomass, biofuels, and bioenergy. The journal publishes a wide range of articles, including peer-reviewed scientific research, reviews, perspectives and commentary, industry news, and government policy updates. Its coverage brings together a uniquely broad combination of disciplines with a common focus on feedstock biology and science, related to biomass, biofeedstock, and bioenergy production.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信