不同营养专门化可耕地锦鲤杂草种子DNA检出率的差异

IF 1.2 3区 农林科学 Q3 ENTOMOLOGY
Veronika Neidel, Hana Vašková, Corinna Wallinger, Pavel Saska
{"title":"不同营养专门化可耕地锦鲤杂草种子DNA检出率的差异","authors":"Veronika Neidel,&nbsp;Hana Vašková,&nbsp;Corinna Wallinger,&nbsp;Pavel Saska","doi":"10.1007/s11829-024-10122-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>While most ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) include seeds in their diet, preferences for seed feeding vary among carabid species and range from facultative diet supplementation to obligate seed feeding. DNA-based diet analyses have been used to study their regulatory effect on soil seedbanks. It is unknown whether specialized granivores digest seed species they are adapted to (‘essential seeds’) faster, and whether this affects food web construction based on molecular data. We hypothesized that specialized granivores digest their essential seed faster than other seeds, and at faster rates than generalist granivores or carnivores. Further, we assumed that generalist granivores digest different seeds equally fast, while carnivorous carabids digest seeds slower than granivores. In feeding experiments, three carabid species—<i>Amara similata</i> (specialized granivore), <i>Harpalus affinis</i> (generalist granivore), and <i>Poecilus cupreus</i> (generalist carnivore)—were fed either a broadly accepted seed or the specialist's essential seed. Gut content samples were collected 0, 6, 12, 24, 48, and 72 h after feeding and screened with plant-primers to trace seed DNA. Time until 50% detection probability in the specialists was shorter for its essential than the broadly accepted seed and shorter than in the generalist granivore, which digested both seed species equally fast. The carnivore was reluctant to feed on the seed species offered, and detection probabilities did not significantly decrease with digestion time. Our findings suggest that the strength of specialized granivores’ feeding interactions and their role in weed seed regulation might be underestimated when assessed with DNA-based diet analysis, due to their more efficient seed digestion.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8409,"journal":{"name":"Arthropod-Plant Interactions","volume":"19 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11829-024-10122-0.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Variation in weed seed DNA detectability among arable carabids with different trophic specialization\",\"authors\":\"Veronika Neidel,&nbsp;Hana Vašková,&nbsp;Corinna Wallinger,&nbsp;Pavel Saska\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11829-024-10122-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>While most ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) include seeds in their diet, preferences for seed feeding vary among carabid species and range from facultative diet supplementation to obligate seed feeding. DNA-based diet analyses have been used to study their regulatory effect on soil seedbanks. It is unknown whether specialized granivores digest seed species they are adapted to (‘essential seeds’) faster, and whether this affects food web construction based on molecular data. We hypothesized that specialized granivores digest their essential seed faster than other seeds, and at faster rates than generalist granivores or carnivores. Further, we assumed that generalist granivores digest different seeds equally fast, while carnivorous carabids digest seeds slower than granivores. In feeding experiments, three carabid species—<i>Amara similata</i> (specialized granivore), <i>Harpalus affinis</i> (generalist granivore), and <i>Poecilus cupreus</i> (generalist carnivore)—were fed either a broadly accepted seed or the specialist's essential seed. Gut content samples were collected 0, 6, 12, 24, 48, and 72 h after feeding and screened with plant-primers to trace seed DNA. Time until 50% detection probability in the specialists was shorter for its essential than the broadly accepted seed and shorter than in the generalist granivore, which digested both seed species equally fast. The carnivore was reluctant to feed on the seed species offered, and detection probabilities did not significantly decrease with digestion time. Our findings suggest that the strength of specialized granivores’ feeding interactions and their role in weed seed regulation might be underestimated when assessed with DNA-based diet analysis, due to their more efficient seed digestion.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8409,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Arthropod-Plant Interactions\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11829-024-10122-0.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Arthropod-Plant Interactions\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11829-024-10122-0\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENTOMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arthropod-Plant Interactions","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11829-024-10122-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENTOMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

虽然大多数地面甲虫(鞘翅目:甲虫科)的饮食中包括种子,但不同种类的甲虫对种子摄食的偏好不同,从兼性饮食补充到强制性摄食种子。基于dna的饲粮分析已被用于研究它们对土壤种子库的调节作用。目前尚不清楚特定的花岗岩动物是否能更快地消化它们所适应的种子物种(“必需种子”),以及这是否会影响基于分子数据的食物网构建。我们假设,特殊的花岗岩动物消化它们必需的种子比其他种子更快,比一般的花岗岩动物或食肉动物更快。此外,我们假设多面手食草动物消化不同种子的速度相同,而肉食性瓢虫消化种子的速度比食草动物慢。在喂养实验中,三种carabides物种——amara similata(专门性花岗岩动物)、Harpalus affinis(专门性花岗岩动物)和Poecilus cupreus(专门性食肉动物)——被喂食广泛接受的种子或专门性的必需种子。分别于饲喂后0、6、12、24、48和72 h采集肠道内容物样本,用植物引物筛选种子DNA。专家种子在达到50%检测概率之前的时间要短于被广泛接受的种子,也短于消化两种种子的通才种子。食肉动物不愿以提供的种子品种为食,并且随着消化时间的延长,检测概率没有显著降低。我们的研究结果表明,当使用基于dna的饮食分析评估时,由于它们更有效地消化种子,专门的花岗岩动物的摄食相互作用的强度及其在杂草种子调节中的作用可能被低估了。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Variation in weed seed DNA detectability among arable carabids with different trophic specialization

While most ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) include seeds in their diet, preferences for seed feeding vary among carabid species and range from facultative diet supplementation to obligate seed feeding. DNA-based diet analyses have been used to study their regulatory effect on soil seedbanks. It is unknown whether specialized granivores digest seed species they are adapted to (‘essential seeds’) faster, and whether this affects food web construction based on molecular data. We hypothesized that specialized granivores digest their essential seed faster than other seeds, and at faster rates than generalist granivores or carnivores. Further, we assumed that generalist granivores digest different seeds equally fast, while carnivorous carabids digest seeds slower than granivores. In feeding experiments, three carabid species—Amara similata (specialized granivore), Harpalus affinis (generalist granivore), and Poecilus cupreus (generalist carnivore)—were fed either a broadly accepted seed or the specialist's essential seed. Gut content samples were collected 0, 6, 12, 24, 48, and 72 h after feeding and screened with plant-primers to trace seed DNA. Time until 50% detection probability in the specialists was shorter for its essential than the broadly accepted seed and shorter than in the generalist granivore, which digested both seed species equally fast. The carnivore was reluctant to feed on the seed species offered, and detection probabilities did not significantly decrease with digestion time. Our findings suggest that the strength of specialized granivores’ feeding interactions and their role in weed seed regulation might be underestimated when assessed with DNA-based diet analysis, due to their more efficient seed digestion.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Arthropod-Plant Interactions
Arthropod-Plant Interactions 生物-昆虫学
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
6.20%
发文量
58
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Arthropod-Plant Interactions is dedicated to publishing high quality original papers and reviews with a broad fundamental or applied focus on ecological, biological, and evolutionary aspects of the interactions between insects and other arthropods with plants. Coverage extends to all aspects of such interactions including chemical, biochemical, genetic, and molecular analysis, as well reporting on multitrophic studies, ecophysiology, and mutualism. Arthropod-Plant Interactions encourages the submission of forum papers that challenge prevailing hypotheses. The journal encourages a diversity of opinion by presenting both invited and unsolicited review papers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信