鞋带张力测试系统的研制及不同跑速对鞋带张力变化的影响研究

IF 4.9 3区 计算机科学 Q1 ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Shutao Wei, Xinyu Guo, Shaocong Zhao, Biao Yan, Lingjun Li, Jiahao Pan, Li Li
{"title":"鞋带张力测试系统的研制及不同跑速对鞋带张力变化的影响研究","authors":"Shutao Wei,&nbsp;Xinyu Guo,&nbsp;Shaocong Zhao,&nbsp;Biao Yan,&nbsp;Lingjun Li,&nbsp;Jiahao Pan,&nbsp;Li Li","doi":"10.1007/s42235-024-00612-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study investigated the validity and sensitivity of a custom-made shoelace tensile testing system. The aim was to analyze the distribution pattern of shoelace tension in different positions and under different tightness levels during running. Mechanical tests were conducted using 16 weights, and various statistical analyses, including linear regression, Bland-Altman plots, coefficient of variation, and intraclass correlation coefficient, were performed to assess the system’s validity. Fifteen male amateur runners participated in the study, and three conditions (loose, comfortable, and tight) were measured during an upright stance. The system utilized VICON motion systems, a Kistler force plate, and a Photoelectric gate speed measurement system. Results showed a linear relationship between voltage and load at the three sensors (R2 ≥ 0.9997). Bland-Altman plots demonstrated 95% prediction intervals within ± 1.96SD from zero for all sensors. The average coefficient of variation for each sensor was less than 0.38%. Intraclass correlation coefficient values were larger than 0.999 (<i>p</i>&lt;0.0001) for each sensor. The peak tension of the front shoelace was greater than that of the front and middle when the shoelace was loose and tight. The rear shoelace had the highest tension force. The study also found that shoelace tension varied throughout the gait cycle during running. Overall, this research provides a novel and validated method for measuring shoelace tensile stress, which has implications for developing automatic shoelace fastening systems.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":614,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Bionic Engineering","volume":"22 1","pages":"214 - 225"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s42235-024-00612-5.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development of a Shoelace Tensile Testing System and Investigation into the Effects of Different Running Speeds on Shoelace Tensile Variation\",\"authors\":\"Shutao Wei,&nbsp;Xinyu Guo,&nbsp;Shaocong Zhao,&nbsp;Biao Yan,&nbsp;Lingjun Li,&nbsp;Jiahao Pan,&nbsp;Li Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s42235-024-00612-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This study investigated the validity and sensitivity of a custom-made shoelace tensile testing system. The aim was to analyze the distribution pattern of shoelace tension in different positions and under different tightness levels during running. Mechanical tests were conducted using 16 weights, and various statistical analyses, including linear regression, Bland-Altman plots, coefficient of variation, and intraclass correlation coefficient, were performed to assess the system’s validity. Fifteen male amateur runners participated in the study, and three conditions (loose, comfortable, and tight) were measured during an upright stance. The system utilized VICON motion systems, a Kistler force plate, and a Photoelectric gate speed measurement system. Results showed a linear relationship between voltage and load at the three sensors (R2 ≥ 0.9997). Bland-Altman plots demonstrated 95% prediction intervals within ± 1.96SD from zero for all sensors. The average coefficient of variation for each sensor was less than 0.38%. Intraclass correlation coefficient values were larger than 0.999 (<i>p</i>&lt;0.0001) for each sensor. The peak tension of the front shoelace was greater than that of the front and middle when the shoelace was loose and tight. The rear shoelace had the highest tension force. The study also found that shoelace tension varied throughout the gait cycle during running. Overall, this research provides a novel and validated method for measuring shoelace tensile stress, which has implications for developing automatic shoelace fastening systems.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":614,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Bionic Engineering\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"214 - 225\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s42235-024-00612-5.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Bionic Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s42235-024-00612-5\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Bionic Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s42235-024-00612-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究考察了定制的鞋带拉力测试系统的有效性和灵敏度。目的是分析跑步过程中不同位置、不同松紧程度下鞋带张力的分布规律。采用16个权值进行力学检验,并采用线性回归、Bland-Altman图、变异系数、类内相关系数等统计分析评估系统的效度。15名男性业余跑步者参与了这项研究,并在直立站立时测量了三种情况(宽松、舒适和紧绷)。该系统采用了VICON运动系统、Kistler测力板和光电门速度测量系统。结果表明,电压与负载在三个传感器处呈线性关系(R2≥0.9997)。Bland-Altman图显示,所有传感器的95%预测区间在距零±1.96SD内。各传感器的平均变异系数小于0.38%。每个传感器的类内相关系数值均大于0.999 (p<0.0001)。鞋带松、紧时,前系鞋带的峰值拉力大于前系鞋带和中系鞋带。后鞋带的张力最大。研究还发现,在跑步过程中,鞋带的张力随步态周期的变化而变化。总的来说,本研究提供了一种新颖且有效的测量鞋带拉应力的方法,这对开发鞋带自动紧固系统具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Development of a Shoelace Tensile Testing System and Investigation into the Effects of Different Running Speeds on Shoelace Tensile Variation

This study investigated the validity and sensitivity of a custom-made shoelace tensile testing system. The aim was to analyze the distribution pattern of shoelace tension in different positions and under different tightness levels during running. Mechanical tests were conducted using 16 weights, and various statistical analyses, including linear regression, Bland-Altman plots, coefficient of variation, and intraclass correlation coefficient, were performed to assess the system’s validity. Fifteen male amateur runners participated in the study, and three conditions (loose, comfortable, and tight) were measured during an upright stance. The system utilized VICON motion systems, a Kistler force plate, and a Photoelectric gate speed measurement system. Results showed a linear relationship between voltage and load at the three sensors (R2 ≥ 0.9997). Bland-Altman plots demonstrated 95% prediction intervals within ± 1.96SD from zero for all sensors. The average coefficient of variation for each sensor was less than 0.38%. Intraclass correlation coefficient values were larger than 0.999 (p<0.0001) for each sensor. The peak tension of the front shoelace was greater than that of the front and middle when the shoelace was loose and tight. The rear shoelace had the highest tension force. The study also found that shoelace tension varied throughout the gait cycle during running. Overall, this research provides a novel and validated method for measuring shoelace tensile stress, which has implications for developing automatic shoelace fastening systems.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Bionic Engineering
Journal of Bionic Engineering 工程技术-材料科学:生物材料
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
10.00%
发文量
162
审稿时长
10.0 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Bionic Engineering (JBE) is a peer-reviewed journal that publishes original research papers and reviews that apply the knowledge learned from nature and biological systems to solve concrete engineering problems. The topics that JBE covers include but are not limited to: Mechanisms, kinematical mechanics and control of animal locomotion, development of mobile robots with walking (running and crawling), swimming or flying abilities inspired by animal locomotion. Structures, morphologies, composition and physical properties of natural and biomaterials; fabrication of new materials mimicking the properties and functions of natural and biomaterials. Biomedical materials, artificial organs and tissue engineering for medical applications; rehabilitation equipment and devices. Development of bioinspired computation methods and artificial intelligence for engineering applications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信