人皮质骨组织的非均匀断裂韧性

IF 2.2 3区 工程技术 Q3 MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Maxime Levy, Zohar Yosibash
{"title":"人皮质骨组织的非均匀断裂韧性","authors":"Maxime Levy,&nbsp;Zohar Yosibash","doi":"10.1007/s10704-024-00836-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>CT-based finite element analysis (FEA) of human bones helps estimate fracture risk in clinical practice by linking bone ash density (<span>\\(\\rho _{ash}\\)</span>) to mechanical parameters. However, phase field models for fracture prediction require the heterogeneous fracture toughness <span>\\(G_{Ic}\\)</span>, which can be derived from the critical stress intensity factor <span>\\(K_{Ic}\\)</span>, determined through various experimental methods. Due to a lack of standards for determining cortical bone’s <span>\\(K_{Ic}\\)</span>, an experimental campaign is presented using 53 cortical specimens from two fresh frozen femurs to investigate whether a correlation exists between <span>\\(K_{Ic}\\)</span> and <span>\\(\\rho _{ash}\\)</span>. We investigated various experimental techniques for correlating <span>\\(K_{Ic}\\)</span> with <span>\\(\\rho _{ash}\\)</span>. We conducted FEAs employing the phase field method (PFM) to determine the most suitable correlation among the five possible ones stemming from the experimental methods. The ASTM standard using displacement at force application point was found to be the recommended experimental method for the estimation of <span>\\(K_{Ic}\\)</span> perpendicular to osteons’ direction </p><div><div><span>$$\\begin{aligned} K_{Ic} [MPa\\sqrt{m}]{=}1.89\\left( \\rho _{ash} [gr/cc] \\right) ^{1.88} \\,\\, R^2{=}0.5374. \\end{aligned}$$</span></div></div><p>The corresponding statistical critical energy release rate bounds were determined: </p><div><div><span>$$\\begin{aligned} G_{Ic}[N/m]= 321.94 (\\rho _{ash}[gr/cc])^{1.69} \\times exp(\\pm 2SD), \\end{aligned}$$</span></div></div><p>with a standard deviation <span>\\(SD= 0.30\\)</span> representing a 95.4% confidence interval. The average <span>\\(G_{Ic}\\)</span> resulted in good correlations between the predicted fracture force by PFM-FEA of four representative specimens and experimental fracture forces. The proposed correlations will be used in CT-based PFM FEA to estimate the risk of hip and humeral fractures.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":590,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Fracture","volume":"249 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10704-024-00836-w.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Heterogeneous fracture toughness of human cortical bone tissue\",\"authors\":\"Maxime Levy,&nbsp;Zohar Yosibash\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10704-024-00836-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>CT-based finite element analysis (FEA) of human bones helps estimate fracture risk in clinical practice by linking bone ash density (<span>\\\\(\\\\rho _{ash}\\\\)</span>) to mechanical parameters. However, phase field models for fracture prediction require the heterogeneous fracture toughness <span>\\\\(G_{Ic}\\\\)</span>, which can be derived from the critical stress intensity factor <span>\\\\(K_{Ic}\\\\)</span>, determined through various experimental methods. Due to a lack of standards for determining cortical bone’s <span>\\\\(K_{Ic}\\\\)</span>, an experimental campaign is presented using 53 cortical specimens from two fresh frozen femurs to investigate whether a correlation exists between <span>\\\\(K_{Ic}\\\\)</span> and <span>\\\\(\\\\rho _{ash}\\\\)</span>. We investigated various experimental techniques for correlating <span>\\\\(K_{Ic}\\\\)</span> with <span>\\\\(\\\\rho _{ash}\\\\)</span>. We conducted FEAs employing the phase field method (PFM) to determine the most suitable correlation among the five possible ones stemming from the experimental methods. The ASTM standard using displacement at force application point was found to be the recommended experimental method for the estimation of <span>\\\\(K_{Ic}\\\\)</span> perpendicular to osteons’ direction </p><div><div><span>$$\\\\begin{aligned} K_{Ic} [MPa\\\\sqrt{m}]{=}1.89\\\\left( \\\\rho _{ash} [gr/cc] \\\\right) ^{1.88} \\\\,\\\\, R^2{=}0.5374. \\\\end{aligned}$$</span></div></div><p>The corresponding statistical critical energy release rate bounds were determined: </p><div><div><span>$$\\\\begin{aligned} G_{Ic}[N/m]= 321.94 (\\\\rho _{ash}[gr/cc])^{1.69} \\\\times exp(\\\\pm 2SD), \\\\end{aligned}$$</span></div></div><p>with a standard deviation <span>\\\\(SD= 0.30\\\\)</span> representing a 95.4% confidence interval. The average <span>\\\\(G_{Ic}\\\\)</span> resulted in good correlations between the predicted fracture force by PFM-FEA of four representative specimens and experimental fracture forces. The proposed correlations will be used in CT-based PFM FEA to estimate the risk of hip and humeral fractures.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":590,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Fracture\",\"volume\":\"249 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10704-024-00836-w.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Fracture\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10704-024-00836-w\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Fracture","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10704-024-00836-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

基于ct的人骨有限元分析(FEA)通过将骨密度(\(\rho _{ash}\))与力学参数联系起来,有助于在临床实践中估计骨折风险。然而,用于断裂预测的相场模型需要非均质断裂韧性\(G_{Ic}\),该韧性可由各种实验方法确定的临界应力强度因子\(K_{Ic}\)导出。由于缺乏确定皮质骨\(K_{Ic}\)的标准,本文提出了一项实验,使用来自两个新鲜冷冻股骨的53个皮质标本来研究\(K_{Ic}\)和\(\rho _{ash}\)之间是否存在相关性。我们研究了将\(K_{Ic}\)与\(\rho _{ash}\)相关联的各种实验技术。我们采用相场法(PFM)进行了有限元分析,以确定从实验方法得出的五种可能的相关性中最合适的相关性。发现使用施力点位移的ASTM标准是估计\(K_{Ic}\)垂直于骨方向$$\begin{aligned} K_{Ic} [MPa\sqrt{m}]{=}1.89\left( \rho _{ash} [gr/cc] \right) ^{1.88} \,\, R^2{=}0.5374. \end{aligned}$$的推荐实验方法。确定相应的统计临界能量释放率界限:$$\begin{aligned} G_{Ic}[N/m]= 321.94 (\rho _{ash}[gr/cc])^{1.69} \times exp(\pm 2SD), \end{aligned}$$,标准差\(SD= 0.30\)代表95.4% confidence interval. The average \(G_{Ic}\) resulted in good correlations between the predicted fracture force by PFM-FEA of four representative specimens and experimental fracture forces. The proposed correlations will be used in CT-based PFM FEA to estimate the risk of hip and humeral fractures.
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Heterogeneous fracture toughness of human cortical bone tissue

CT-based finite element analysis (FEA) of human bones helps estimate fracture risk in clinical practice by linking bone ash density (\(\rho _{ash}\)) to mechanical parameters. However, phase field models for fracture prediction require the heterogeneous fracture toughness \(G_{Ic}\), which can be derived from the critical stress intensity factor \(K_{Ic}\), determined through various experimental methods. Due to a lack of standards for determining cortical bone’s \(K_{Ic}\), an experimental campaign is presented using 53 cortical specimens from two fresh frozen femurs to investigate whether a correlation exists between \(K_{Ic}\) and \(\rho _{ash}\). We investigated various experimental techniques for correlating \(K_{Ic}\) with \(\rho _{ash}\). We conducted FEAs employing the phase field method (PFM) to determine the most suitable correlation among the five possible ones stemming from the experimental methods. The ASTM standard using displacement at force application point was found to be the recommended experimental method for the estimation of \(K_{Ic}\) perpendicular to osteons’ direction

$$\begin{aligned} K_{Ic} [MPa\sqrt{m}]{=}1.89\left( \rho _{ash} [gr/cc] \right) ^{1.88} \,\, R^2{=}0.5374. \end{aligned}$$

The corresponding statistical critical energy release rate bounds were determined:

$$\begin{aligned} G_{Ic}[N/m]= 321.94 (\rho _{ash}[gr/cc])^{1.69} \times exp(\pm 2SD), \end{aligned}$$

with a standard deviation \(SD= 0.30\) representing a 95.4% confidence interval. The average \(G_{Ic}\) resulted in good correlations between the predicted fracture force by PFM-FEA of four representative specimens and experimental fracture forces. The proposed correlations will be used in CT-based PFM FEA to estimate the risk of hip and humeral fractures.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Fracture
International Journal of Fracture 物理-材料科学:综合
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
8.00%
发文量
74
审稿时长
13.5 months
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Fracture is an outlet for original analytical, numerical and experimental contributions which provide improved understanding of the mechanisms of micro and macro fracture in all materials, and their engineering implications. The Journal is pleased to receive papers from engineers and scientists working in various aspects of fracture. Contributions emphasizing empirical correlations, unanalyzed experimental results or routine numerical computations, while representing important necessary aspects of certain fatigue, strength, and fracture analyses, will normally be discouraged; occasional review papers in these as well as other areas are welcomed. Innovative and in-depth engineering applications of fracture theory are also encouraged. In addition, the Journal welcomes, for rapid publication, Brief Notes in Fracture and Micromechanics which serve the Journal''s Objective. Brief Notes include: Brief presentation of a new idea, concept or method; new experimental observations or methods of significance; short notes of quality that do not amount to full length papers; discussion of previously published work in the Journal, and Brief Notes Errata.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信