电化学方法在小麦淀粉工业废水处理中的应用评价

IF 3 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Ehsan Fooladgar, Masoud Taheriyoun, Danial Bakhodaei
{"title":"电化学方法在小麦淀粉工业废水处理中的应用评价","authors":"Ehsan Fooladgar,&nbsp;Masoud Taheriyoun,&nbsp;Danial Bakhodaei","doi":"10.1007/s11270-025-07756-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Wastewater from wheat starch industries is the one with high chemical oxygen demand (COD) level that has adverse effects on the environment and thus special attention to its treatment for the discharge limits satisfaction is crucial. Biological treatment methods have challenges such as requiring extensive space and process time, high sludge production, and efficient management and operation demands. To overcome these challenges, electrochemical methods such as electrocoagulation (EC) and electro-Fenton (EF) can be efficient approaches due to their higher process speeds, minimal facility requirements, and easy operation which make them economically viable. In this study, electrochemical processes, including EC and EF methods were applied for wastewater treatment of a wheat starch industry. After preliminary experiments to identify the effective factors and ranges, the response surface method (RSM) was applied to design the experiments. In RSM seven factors were considered including initial COD, pH, electrode distances, process time, temperature, current intensity, and hydrogen peroxide concentration along with the COD removal efficiency as the response. Statistical analysis showed that hydrogen peroxide concentration and initial COD had the most significant impact, while pH had the least effect on COD removal in the electrochemical process. The optimum results showed that for synthetic wastewater with an initial COD range of 2000–4000 mg/L a COD removal of 75–85% for EC and 89–93% removal for EF were obtained. The results were validated for raw natural wastewater with 88% removal for EC and 92% for EF. In conclusion, while the removal efficiency of the EF process was superior to EC, the former incurs higher costs due to the use of hydrogen peroxide.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":808,"journal":{"name":"Water, Air, & Soil Pollution","volume":"236 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of Electro-chemical Methods in Wastewater Treatment of Wheat Starch Industry\",\"authors\":\"Ehsan Fooladgar,&nbsp;Masoud Taheriyoun,&nbsp;Danial Bakhodaei\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11270-025-07756-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Wastewater from wheat starch industries is the one with high chemical oxygen demand (COD) level that has adverse effects on the environment and thus special attention to its treatment for the discharge limits satisfaction is crucial. Biological treatment methods have challenges such as requiring extensive space and process time, high sludge production, and efficient management and operation demands. To overcome these challenges, electrochemical methods such as electrocoagulation (EC) and electro-Fenton (EF) can be efficient approaches due to their higher process speeds, minimal facility requirements, and easy operation which make them economically viable. In this study, electrochemical processes, including EC and EF methods were applied for wastewater treatment of a wheat starch industry. After preliminary experiments to identify the effective factors and ranges, the response surface method (RSM) was applied to design the experiments. In RSM seven factors were considered including initial COD, pH, electrode distances, process time, temperature, current intensity, and hydrogen peroxide concentration along with the COD removal efficiency as the response. Statistical analysis showed that hydrogen peroxide concentration and initial COD had the most significant impact, while pH had the least effect on COD removal in the electrochemical process. The optimum results showed that for synthetic wastewater with an initial COD range of 2000–4000 mg/L a COD removal of 75–85% for EC and 89–93% removal for EF were obtained. The results were validated for raw natural wastewater with 88% removal for EC and 92% for EF. In conclusion, while the removal efficiency of the EF process was superior to EC, the former incurs higher costs due to the use of hydrogen peroxide.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":808,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Water, Air, & Soil Pollution\",\"volume\":\"236 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Water, Air, & Soil Pollution\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"6\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11270-025-07756-y\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Water, Air, & Soil Pollution","FirstCategoryId":"6","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11270-025-07756-y","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

小麦淀粉工业废水是化学需氧量高且对环境有不良影响的废水,其处理对满足排放限值至关重要。生物处理方法需要较大的空间和处理时间,污泥产量高,管理和操作要求高。为了克服这些挑战,电凝(EC)和电fenton (EF)等电化学方法可以成为有效的方法,因为它们具有更高的处理速度,最小的设施要求以及易于操作,使其在经济上可行。在本研究中,采用电化学方法,包括EC和EF法处理小麦淀粉工业废水。在初步试验确定影响因素和范围后,采用响应面法(RSM)设计试验。在RSM中,考虑了初始COD、pH、电极距离、处理时间、温度、电流强度和过氧化氢浓度等7个因素,并以COD去除率为响应。统计分析表明,过氧化氢浓度和初始COD对电化学过程中COD去除率的影响最为显著,pH对COD去除率的影响最小。优化结果表明,对于初始COD范围为2000 ~ 4000 mg/L的合成废水,EC的COD去除率为75 ~ 85%,EF的去除率为89 ~ 93%。结果表明,在天然废水中,EC去除率为88%,EF去除率为92%。综上所述,虽然EF法的去除效率优于EC法,但由于使用了过氧化氢,其成本较高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Evaluation of Electro-chemical Methods in Wastewater Treatment of Wheat Starch Industry

Evaluation of Electro-chemical Methods in Wastewater Treatment of Wheat Starch Industry

Wastewater from wheat starch industries is the one with high chemical oxygen demand (COD) level that has adverse effects on the environment and thus special attention to its treatment for the discharge limits satisfaction is crucial. Biological treatment methods have challenges such as requiring extensive space and process time, high sludge production, and efficient management and operation demands. To overcome these challenges, electrochemical methods such as electrocoagulation (EC) and electro-Fenton (EF) can be efficient approaches due to their higher process speeds, minimal facility requirements, and easy operation which make them economically viable. In this study, electrochemical processes, including EC and EF methods were applied for wastewater treatment of a wheat starch industry. After preliminary experiments to identify the effective factors and ranges, the response surface method (RSM) was applied to design the experiments. In RSM seven factors were considered including initial COD, pH, electrode distances, process time, temperature, current intensity, and hydrogen peroxide concentration along with the COD removal efficiency as the response. Statistical analysis showed that hydrogen peroxide concentration and initial COD had the most significant impact, while pH had the least effect on COD removal in the electrochemical process. The optimum results showed that for synthetic wastewater with an initial COD range of 2000–4000 mg/L a COD removal of 75–85% for EC and 89–93% removal for EF were obtained. The results were validated for raw natural wastewater with 88% removal for EC and 92% for EF. In conclusion, while the removal efficiency of the EF process was superior to EC, the former incurs higher costs due to the use of hydrogen peroxide.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Water, Air, & Soil Pollution
Water, Air, & Soil Pollution 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
6.90%
发文量
448
审稿时长
2.6 months
期刊介绍: Water, Air, & Soil Pollution is an international, interdisciplinary journal on all aspects of pollution and solutions to pollution in the biosphere. This includes chemical, physical and biological processes affecting flora, fauna, water, air and soil in relation to environmental pollution. Because of its scope, the subject areas are diverse and include all aspects of pollution sources, transport, deposition, accumulation, acid precipitation, atmospheric pollution, metals, aquatic pollution including marine pollution and ground water, waste water, pesticides, soil pollution, sewage, sediment pollution, forestry pollution, effects of pollutants on humans, vegetation, fish, aquatic species, micro-organisms, and animals, environmental and molecular toxicology applied to pollution research, biosensors, global and climate change, ecological implications of pollution and pollution models. Water, Air, & Soil Pollution also publishes manuscripts on novel methods used in the study of environmental pollutants, environmental toxicology, environmental biology, novel environmental engineering related to pollution, biodiversity as influenced by pollution, novel environmental biotechnology as applied to pollution (e.g. bioremediation), environmental modelling and biorestoration of polluted environments. Articles should not be submitted that are of local interest only and do not advance international knowledge in environmental pollution and solutions to pollution. Articles that simply replicate known knowledge or techniques while researching a local pollution problem will normally be rejected without review. Submitted articles must have up-to-date references, employ the correct experimental replication and statistical analysis, where needed and contain a significant contribution to new knowledge. The publishing and editorial team sincerely appreciate your cooperation. Water, Air, & Soil Pollution publishes research papers; review articles; mini-reviews; and book reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信