优化蛋白质质量:来自不同来源的单一和组合替代蛋白质的协同作用和比较

IF 3 3区 农林科学 Q2 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Keshia Broucke, Simon Van De Walle, Marina Mefleh, Barbara Duquenne, Geert Van Royen, Fatma Boukid
{"title":"优化蛋白质质量:来自不同来源的单一和组合替代蛋白质的协同作用和比较","authors":"Keshia Broucke,&nbsp;Simon Van De Walle,&nbsp;Marina Mefleh,&nbsp;Barbara Duquenne,&nbsp;Geert Van Royen,&nbsp;Fatma Boukid","doi":"10.1007/s00217-024-04610-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The global shift towards plant-based diets underlines the critical need to thoroughly evaluate the nutritional value of alternative proteins to meet dietary requirements. To effectively assess the protein quality, it is crucial to understand its composition and digestibility. Through this study, the protein quality assessment of a panel of proteins deriving from emerging plants (i.e., legumes and cereals) and microalgae sources (n = 8) was conducted. Protein digestibility, analyzed using two different methods and expressed in three different ways, showed a high discrepancy. This suggests that relying on two quantification methods and different ways of result expression can give a broader insight into understanding the protein digestibility of alternative proteins compared to a unilateral approach. The amino acid profiles and digestibility scores of individual proteins revealed that all sources contained limiting amino acids and that none met the dietary requirements. Based on the individual amino acid scores, we conducted theoretical calculations to explore potential protein blends. The optimal blend identified contained no limiting amino acids and included pea protein isolates and corn protein concentrates as the primary components, supplemented with barley protein concentrates, Spirulina, or <i>Nannochloropsis oceanica</i>. These results underscore the importance of protein versatility, demonstrating that strategically blending cereals, legumes, and microalgae can significantly enhance nutritional quality.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":549,"journal":{"name":"European Food Research and Technology","volume":"251 1","pages":"31 - 43"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Optimizing protein quality: synergies and comparisons of single and combined alternative proteins from diverse sources\",\"authors\":\"Keshia Broucke,&nbsp;Simon Van De Walle,&nbsp;Marina Mefleh,&nbsp;Barbara Duquenne,&nbsp;Geert Van Royen,&nbsp;Fatma Boukid\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00217-024-04610-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The global shift towards plant-based diets underlines the critical need to thoroughly evaluate the nutritional value of alternative proteins to meet dietary requirements. To effectively assess the protein quality, it is crucial to understand its composition and digestibility. Through this study, the protein quality assessment of a panel of proteins deriving from emerging plants (i.e., legumes and cereals) and microalgae sources (n = 8) was conducted. Protein digestibility, analyzed using two different methods and expressed in three different ways, showed a high discrepancy. This suggests that relying on two quantification methods and different ways of result expression can give a broader insight into understanding the protein digestibility of alternative proteins compared to a unilateral approach. The amino acid profiles and digestibility scores of individual proteins revealed that all sources contained limiting amino acids and that none met the dietary requirements. Based on the individual amino acid scores, we conducted theoretical calculations to explore potential protein blends. The optimal blend identified contained no limiting amino acids and included pea protein isolates and corn protein concentrates as the primary components, supplemented with barley protein concentrates, Spirulina, or <i>Nannochloropsis oceanica</i>. These results underscore the importance of protein versatility, demonstrating that strategically blending cereals, legumes, and microalgae can significantly enhance nutritional quality.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":549,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Food Research and Technology\",\"volume\":\"251 1\",\"pages\":\"31 - 43\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Food Research and Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00217-024-04610-z\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Food Research and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00217-024-04610-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

全球向植物性饮食的转变强调了彻底评估替代蛋白质的营养价值以满足饮食需求的迫切需要。为了有效地评估蛋白质质量,了解其组成和消化率是至关重要的。通过本研究,对来自新兴植物(如豆类和谷物)和微藻(n = 8)来源的一组蛋白质进行了蛋白质质量评估。用两种不同的方法和三种不同的表达方式分析蛋白质消化率,结果差异很大。这表明,与单方方法相比,依靠两种量化方法和不同的结果表达方式可以更广泛地了解替代蛋白的蛋白质消化率。氨基酸谱和单个蛋白质的消化率评分显示,所有来源都含有限制性氨基酸,没有一种符合膳食要求。基于单个氨基酸得分,我们进行了理论计算,以探索潜在的蛋白质混合物。所确定的最佳混合物不含限制性氨基酸,以豌豆分离蛋白和玉米蛋白浓缩物为主要成分,辅以大麦蛋白浓缩物、螺旋藻或海洋纳米绿藻。这些结果强调了蛋白质多样性的重要性,表明有策略地混合谷物、豆类和微藻可以显著提高营养质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Optimizing protein quality: synergies and comparisons of single and combined alternative proteins from diverse sources

The global shift towards plant-based diets underlines the critical need to thoroughly evaluate the nutritional value of alternative proteins to meet dietary requirements. To effectively assess the protein quality, it is crucial to understand its composition and digestibility. Through this study, the protein quality assessment of a panel of proteins deriving from emerging plants (i.e., legumes and cereals) and microalgae sources (n = 8) was conducted. Protein digestibility, analyzed using two different methods and expressed in three different ways, showed a high discrepancy. This suggests that relying on two quantification methods and different ways of result expression can give a broader insight into understanding the protein digestibility of alternative proteins compared to a unilateral approach. The amino acid profiles and digestibility scores of individual proteins revealed that all sources contained limiting amino acids and that none met the dietary requirements. Based on the individual amino acid scores, we conducted theoretical calculations to explore potential protein blends. The optimal blend identified contained no limiting amino acids and included pea protein isolates and corn protein concentrates as the primary components, supplemented with barley protein concentrates, Spirulina, or Nannochloropsis oceanica. These results underscore the importance of protein versatility, demonstrating that strategically blending cereals, legumes, and microalgae can significantly enhance nutritional quality.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European Food Research and Technology
European Food Research and Technology 工程技术-食品科技
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
3.00%
发文量
232
审稿时长
2.0 months
期刊介绍: The journal European Food Research and Technology publishes state-of-the-art research papers and review articles on fundamental and applied food research. The journal''s mission is the fast publication of high quality papers on front-line research, newest techniques and on developing trends in the following sections: -chemistry and biochemistry- technology and molecular biotechnology- nutritional chemistry and toxicology- analytical and sensory methodologies- food physics. Out of the scope of the journal are: - contributions which are not of international interest or do not have a substantial impact on food sciences, - submissions which comprise merely data collections, based on the use of routine analytical or bacteriological methods, - contributions reporting biological or functional effects without profound chemical and/or physical structure characterization of the compound(s) under research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信