Solomon Ofori, Ylenia Di Leto, Štěpánka Smrčková, Marco Antonio Lopez Marin, Giuseppe Gallo, Iveta Růžičková and Jiří Wanner
{"title":"处理过的废水用于作物灌溉:综合健康风险评估†","authors":"Solomon Ofori, Ylenia Di Leto, Štěpánka Smrčková, Marco Antonio Lopez Marin, Giuseppe Gallo, Iveta Růžičková and Jiří Wanner","doi":"10.1039/D4VA00274A","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >The use of treated effluent/wastewater (TWW) for crop irrigation is gaining prominence globally due to growing freshwater scarcity. However, there are still questions about the safety of such a practice. This study sought to investigate and evaluate the health risks associated with the use of TWW for crop irrigation by assessing the potential risks arising from pathogens, heavy metals/potentially toxic elements (PTEs), micropollutants or pharmaceuticals and antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs), using tomato, carrot and cabbage as test crops. The levels of copper bioaccumulated in TWW irrigated crops were 25 mg kg<small><sup>−1</sup></small> for tomato, 30 mg kg<small><sup>−1</sup></small> for carrot and 20 mg kg<small><sup>−1</sup></small> for cabbage, while those of the control (tap water) were 30 mg kg<small><sup>−1</sup></small> for tomato, 40 mg kg<small><sup>−1</sup></small> for carrot and 65 mg kg<small><sup>−1</sup></small> for cabbage, respectively. Arsenic, cadmium and lead levels were below the detection limit for all treatments. The hazard quotient (HQ) and hazard index (HI) of copper and zinc were below 1 (adults) for TWW irrigated crops. <em>Escherichia coli</em>, <em>Clostridium perfringens</em>, coliform and thermotolerant bacteria were not detected on the fruits of tomato plants irrigated with TWW. All analysed pharmaceuticals were below the limit of detection except gabapentin, which was 3 μg kg<small><sup>−1</sup></small> in TWW irrigated tomatoes. <em>tetA</em>, <em>ermB</em>, <em>bla</em><small><sub><em>TEM</em></sub></small>, <em>sul2</em>, <em>sul3</em> and <em>qnrS</em> genes were found in the metagenomic DNA extracted from TWW- and tap-irrigated cabbage. The results indicate no potential non-carcinogenic health risk for adult consumers and no microbial contamination of the tomato fruits under TWW irrigation. No difference was observed in the presence and distribution of the ARGs between TWW- and tap-irrigated crops, suggesting no contribution to the diffusion of different ARGs due to irrigation. Altogether, these findings highlight that health risk assessment of TWW for crop irrigation should focus on the quality of the TWW and on soil characteristics, which may contribute to risk exposure of different types of contaminants.</p>","PeriodicalId":72941,"journal":{"name":"Environmental science. Advances","volume":" 2","pages":" 252-269"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlepdf/2025/va/d4va00274a?page=search","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Treated wastewater reuse for crop irrigation: a comprehensive health risk assessment†\",\"authors\":\"Solomon Ofori, Ylenia Di Leto, Štěpánka Smrčková, Marco Antonio Lopez Marin, Giuseppe Gallo, Iveta Růžičková and Jiří Wanner\",\"doi\":\"10.1039/D4VA00274A\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p >The use of treated effluent/wastewater (TWW) for crop irrigation is gaining prominence globally due to growing freshwater scarcity. However, there are still questions about the safety of such a practice. This study sought to investigate and evaluate the health risks associated with the use of TWW for crop irrigation by assessing the potential risks arising from pathogens, heavy metals/potentially toxic elements (PTEs), micropollutants or pharmaceuticals and antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs), using tomato, carrot and cabbage as test crops. The levels of copper bioaccumulated in TWW irrigated crops were 25 mg kg<small><sup>−1</sup></small> for tomato, 30 mg kg<small><sup>−1</sup></small> for carrot and 20 mg kg<small><sup>−1</sup></small> for cabbage, while those of the control (tap water) were 30 mg kg<small><sup>−1</sup></small> for tomato, 40 mg kg<small><sup>−1</sup></small> for carrot and 65 mg kg<small><sup>−1</sup></small> for cabbage, respectively. Arsenic, cadmium and lead levels were below the detection limit for all treatments. The hazard quotient (HQ) and hazard index (HI) of copper and zinc were below 1 (adults) for TWW irrigated crops. <em>Escherichia coli</em>, <em>Clostridium perfringens</em>, coliform and thermotolerant bacteria were not detected on the fruits of tomato plants irrigated with TWW. All analysed pharmaceuticals were below the limit of detection except gabapentin, which was 3 μg kg<small><sup>−1</sup></small> in TWW irrigated tomatoes. <em>tetA</em>, <em>ermB</em>, <em>bla</em><small><sub><em>TEM</em></sub></small>, <em>sul2</em>, <em>sul3</em> and <em>qnrS</em> genes were found in the metagenomic DNA extracted from TWW- and tap-irrigated cabbage. The results indicate no potential non-carcinogenic health risk for adult consumers and no microbial contamination of the tomato fruits under TWW irrigation. No difference was observed in the presence and distribution of the ARGs between TWW- and tap-irrigated crops, suggesting no contribution to the diffusion of different ARGs due to irrigation. Altogether, these findings highlight that health risk assessment of TWW for crop irrigation should focus on the quality of the TWW and on soil characteristics, which may contribute to risk exposure of different types of contaminants.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72941,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental science. Advances\",\"volume\":\" 2\",\"pages\":\" 252-269\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlepdf/2025/va/d4va00274a?page=search\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental science. Advances\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2025/va/d4va00274a\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental science. Advances","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2025/va/d4va00274a","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
由于淡水日益稀缺,在全球范围内,利用处理过的废水进行作物灌溉日益受到重视。然而,这种做法的安全性仍然存在问题。本研究以番茄、胡萝卜和卷心菜为试验作物,通过评估病原体、重金属/潜在有毒元素(pte)、微污染物或药物和抗生素抗性基因(ARGs)产生的潜在风险,试图调查和评估与使用TWW用于作物灌溉相关的健康风险。TWW灌溉作物的铜生物积累水平分别为番茄25 mg kg - 1、胡萝卜30 mg kg - 1和卷心菜20 mg kg - 1,而对照(自来水)的铜生物积累水平分别为番茄30 mg kg - 1、胡萝卜40 mg kg - 1和卷心菜65 mg kg - 1。所有处理的砷、镉和铅含量均低于检测限。TWW灌溉作物铜、锌的危害商数(HQ)和危害指数(HI)均小于1(成人)。TWW灌溉番茄果实未检出大肠杆菌、产气荚膜梭菌、大肠菌群和耐热菌。除加巴喷丁(TWW灌溉番茄中加巴喷丁含量为3 μg kg−1)外,其余药物均低于检出限。从TWW和滴灌白菜中提取的元基因组DNA中发现了tetA、ermB、blaTEM、sul2、sul3和qnrS基因。结果表明,TWW灌溉对成年消费者无潜在的非致癌性健康风险,对番茄果实无微生物污染。灌水灌溉和滴灌作物的ARGs的存在和分布没有差异,表明灌溉对不同ARGs的扩散没有贡献。综上所述,这些发现突出表明,对用于作物灌溉的TWW的健康风险评估应侧重于TWW的质量和土壤特征,这可能会导致不同类型污染物的风险暴露。
Treated wastewater reuse for crop irrigation: a comprehensive health risk assessment†
The use of treated effluent/wastewater (TWW) for crop irrigation is gaining prominence globally due to growing freshwater scarcity. However, there are still questions about the safety of such a practice. This study sought to investigate and evaluate the health risks associated with the use of TWW for crop irrigation by assessing the potential risks arising from pathogens, heavy metals/potentially toxic elements (PTEs), micropollutants or pharmaceuticals and antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs), using tomato, carrot and cabbage as test crops. The levels of copper bioaccumulated in TWW irrigated crops were 25 mg kg−1 for tomato, 30 mg kg−1 for carrot and 20 mg kg−1 for cabbage, while those of the control (tap water) were 30 mg kg−1 for tomato, 40 mg kg−1 for carrot and 65 mg kg−1 for cabbage, respectively. Arsenic, cadmium and lead levels were below the detection limit for all treatments. The hazard quotient (HQ) and hazard index (HI) of copper and zinc were below 1 (adults) for TWW irrigated crops. Escherichia coli, Clostridium perfringens, coliform and thermotolerant bacteria were not detected on the fruits of tomato plants irrigated with TWW. All analysed pharmaceuticals were below the limit of detection except gabapentin, which was 3 μg kg−1 in TWW irrigated tomatoes. tetA, ermB, blaTEM, sul2, sul3 and qnrS genes were found in the metagenomic DNA extracted from TWW- and tap-irrigated cabbage. The results indicate no potential non-carcinogenic health risk for adult consumers and no microbial contamination of the tomato fruits under TWW irrigation. No difference was observed in the presence and distribution of the ARGs between TWW- and tap-irrigated crops, suggesting no contribution to the diffusion of different ARGs due to irrigation. Altogether, these findings highlight that health risk assessment of TWW for crop irrigation should focus on the quality of the TWW and on soil characteristics, which may contribute to risk exposure of different types of contaminants.