基于区间值PCA技术的不确定大系统传感器故障检测

IF 4.3 2区 综合性期刊 Q1 ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC
Abdelhalim Louifi;Abdelmalek Kouadri;Mohamed Faouzi Harkat;Abderazak Bensmail;Majdi Mansouri
{"title":"基于区间值PCA技术的不确定大系统传感器故障检测","authors":"Abdelhalim Louifi;Abdelmalek Kouadri;Mohamed Faouzi Harkat;Abderazak Bensmail;Majdi Mansouri","doi":"10.1109/JSEN.2024.3507876","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Principal component analysis (PCA)-based fault detection and diagnosis (FDD) is a well-established, data-driven method that has shown remarkable performance. Despite the excellent reputation of the PCA, it is not an optimal solution, mainly due to the effect of system parameters’ uncertainties and imprecise measurements. These drastically affect the decision-making concerning the operating state of the process. In this article, the data collected by different sensors are transformed from a single value to an interval value form by which errors and uncertainties in the measurements are quantified satisfactorily. Then, the process modeling based on the PCA technique has been duly performed for interval-valued. Afterward, the well-known fault detection statistics <inline-formula> <tex-math>${T}^{\\,{2}}$ </tex-math></inline-formula>, Q, and <inline-formula> <tex-math>$\\Phi $ </tex-math></inline-formula> are obtained under an interval-valued representation. The developed technique is tested in the cement rotary kiln process. Its performance in terms of false and missed alarms and detection delay is compared with that of other techniques through an actual involuntary system fault and other different types of sensor faults. The obtained results show high superiority in detecting accurately and quickly distinct faults in a stochastic environment, including unknown and uncontrolled uncertainties. Consequently, the results have been reduced by more than 33%, 85%, and 45% for <inline-formula> <tex-math>${T}^{\\,{2}}$ </tex-math></inline-formula>, Q, and <inline-formula> <tex-math>$\\Phi $ </tex-math></inline-formula>, respectively, compared with the best results of the studied methods.","PeriodicalId":447,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Sensors Journal","volume":"25 2","pages":"3119-3125"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sensor Fault Detection in Uncertain Large-Scale Systems Using Interval-Valued PCA Technique\",\"authors\":\"Abdelhalim Louifi;Abdelmalek Kouadri;Mohamed Faouzi Harkat;Abderazak Bensmail;Majdi Mansouri\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/JSEN.2024.3507876\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Principal component analysis (PCA)-based fault detection and diagnosis (FDD) is a well-established, data-driven method that has shown remarkable performance. Despite the excellent reputation of the PCA, it is not an optimal solution, mainly due to the effect of system parameters’ uncertainties and imprecise measurements. These drastically affect the decision-making concerning the operating state of the process. In this article, the data collected by different sensors are transformed from a single value to an interval value form by which errors and uncertainties in the measurements are quantified satisfactorily. Then, the process modeling based on the PCA technique has been duly performed for interval-valued. Afterward, the well-known fault detection statistics <inline-formula> <tex-math>${T}^{\\\\,{2}}$ </tex-math></inline-formula>, Q, and <inline-formula> <tex-math>$\\\\Phi $ </tex-math></inline-formula> are obtained under an interval-valued representation. The developed technique is tested in the cement rotary kiln process. Its performance in terms of false and missed alarms and detection delay is compared with that of other techniques through an actual involuntary system fault and other different types of sensor faults. The obtained results show high superiority in detecting accurately and quickly distinct faults in a stochastic environment, including unknown and uncontrolled uncertainties. Consequently, the results have been reduced by more than 33%, 85%, and 45% for <inline-formula> <tex-math>${T}^{\\\\,{2}}$ </tex-math></inline-formula>, Q, and <inline-formula> <tex-math>$\\\\Phi $ </tex-math></inline-formula>, respectively, compared with the best results of the studied methods.\",\"PeriodicalId\":447,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IEEE Sensors Journal\",\"volume\":\"25 2\",\"pages\":\"3119-3125\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IEEE Sensors Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"103\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10785572/\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"综合性期刊\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Sensors Journal","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10785572/","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

基于主成分分析(PCA)的故障检测与诊断(FDD)是一种成熟的、数据驱动的故障检测与诊断方法。尽管主成分分析具有良好的声誉,但它并不是最优解,主要是由于系统参数的不确定性和不精确测量的影响。这些极大地影响了有关流程运行状态的决策。本文将不同传感器采集的数据由单一值转化为区间值形式,使测量中的误差和不确定度得到满意的量化。然后,对区间值进行了基于主成分分析技术的过程建模。然后,在区间值表示下得到了众所周知的故障检测统计量${T}^{\,{2}}$, Q和$\Phi $。该技术已在水泥回转窑生产过程中进行了试验。通过实际的非自愿系统故障和其他不同类型的传感器故障,将其在误报漏报和检测延迟方面的性能与其他技术进行比较。结果表明,该方法在随机环境(包括未知和不可控的不确定性)下,能够准确、快速地检测出明显的故障。因此,${T}^{\,{2}}$, Q和$\Phi $的结果分别比所研究方法的最佳结果减少了33%,85%和45%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Sensor Fault Detection in Uncertain Large-Scale Systems Using Interval-Valued PCA Technique
Principal component analysis (PCA)-based fault detection and diagnosis (FDD) is a well-established, data-driven method that has shown remarkable performance. Despite the excellent reputation of the PCA, it is not an optimal solution, mainly due to the effect of system parameters’ uncertainties and imprecise measurements. These drastically affect the decision-making concerning the operating state of the process. In this article, the data collected by different sensors are transformed from a single value to an interval value form by which errors and uncertainties in the measurements are quantified satisfactorily. Then, the process modeling based on the PCA technique has been duly performed for interval-valued. Afterward, the well-known fault detection statistics ${T}^{\,{2}}$ , Q, and $\Phi $ are obtained under an interval-valued representation. The developed technique is tested in the cement rotary kiln process. Its performance in terms of false and missed alarms and detection delay is compared with that of other techniques through an actual involuntary system fault and other different types of sensor faults. The obtained results show high superiority in detecting accurately and quickly distinct faults in a stochastic environment, including unknown and uncontrolled uncertainties. Consequently, the results have been reduced by more than 33%, 85%, and 45% for ${T}^{\,{2}}$ , Q, and $\Phi $ , respectively, compared with the best results of the studied methods.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
IEEE Sensors Journal
IEEE Sensors Journal 工程技术-工程:电子与电气
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
14.00%
发文量
2058
审稿时长
5.2 months
期刊介绍: The fields of interest of the IEEE Sensors Journal are the theory, design , fabrication, manufacturing and applications of devices for sensing and transducing physical, chemical and biological phenomena, with emphasis on the electronics and physics aspect of sensors and integrated sensors-actuators. IEEE Sensors Journal deals with the following: -Sensor Phenomenology, Modelling, and Evaluation -Sensor Materials, Processing, and Fabrication -Chemical and Gas Sensors -Microfluidics and Biosensors -Optical Sensors -Physical Sensors: Temperature, Mechanical, Magnetic, and others -Acoustic and Ultrasonic Sensors -Sensor Packaging -Sensor Networks -Sensor Applications -Sensor Systems: Signals, Processing, and Interfaces -Actuators and Sensor Power Systems -Sensor Signal Processing for high precision and stability (amplification, filtering, linearization, modulation/demodulation) and under harsh conditions (EMC, radiation, humidity, temperature); energy consumption/harvesting -Sensor Data Processing (soft computing with sensor data, e.g., pattern recognition, machine learning, evolutionary computation; sensor data fusion, processing of wave e.g., electromagnetic and acoustic; and non-wave, e.g., chemical, gravity, particle, thermal, radiative and non-radiative sensor data, detection, estimation and classification based on sensor data) -Sensors in Industrial Practice
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信