社会网络分析的效用,以检查冲突和跨边界的合作:回顾和研究议程的非法摩托车团伙

IF 2.5 1区 社会学 Q1 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY
David Bright, Chad Whelan, Callum Jones, Kelly Edson-Wilkinson
{"title":"社会网络分析的效用,以检查冲突和跨边界的合作:回顾和研究议程的非法摩托车团伙","authors":"David Bright,&nbsp;Chad Whelan,&nbsp;Callum Jones,&nbsp;Kelly Edson-Wilkinson","doi":"10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2024.102346","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Outlaw motorcycle gangs (OMCGs) may be approached along a continuum between gangs and organized crime involving criminal activities such as illicit drug production and distribution, firearms trafficking, and serious violent crime. Approaches to the study of OMCGs, as with the study of gangs more broadly, tend to focus on offending at the individual level, with limited focus on the nature and extent of social network structure and dynamics. In this paper, we focus on the utility of social network analysis (SNA) for analyzing and understanding conflict and collaboration within and between OMCG clubs. We review the existing literature applying SNA to examine collaboration or conflict in the context of OMCGs. Our aim is to identify the many characteristics of actors and groups influencing collaboration and conflict, which we examine as potential boundaries. This review identified five sets of characteristics – membership, rank, core-periphery, ethnicity, and geospatial – that we supplement with additional characteristics by reflecting on the broader criminal network literature, most notably in the scholarship on gangs. We conclude with a research agenda for the study of conflict and collaboration across boundaries that can be applied to the study of OMCGs, gangs, and organized criminal groups.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48272,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Criminal Justice","volume":"97 ","pages":"Article 102346"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The utility of social network analysis to examine conflict and collaboration across boundaries: A review and research agenda for Outlaw Motorcycle Gangs\",\"authors\":\"David Bright,&nbsp;Chad Whelan,&nbsp;Callum Jones,&nbsp;Kelly Edson-Wilkinson\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2024.102346\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Outlaw motorcycle gangs (OMCGs) may be approached along a continuum between gangs and organized crime involving criminal activities such as illicit drug production and distribution, firearms trafficking, and serious violent crime. Approaches to the study of OMCGs, as with the study of gangs more broadly, tend to focus on offending at the individual level, with limited focus on the nature and extent of social network structure and dynamics. In this paper, we focus on the utility of social network analysis (SNA) for analyzing and understanding conflict and collaboration within and between OMCG clubs. We review the existing literature applying SNA to examine collaboration or conflict in the context of OMCGs. Our aim is to identify the many characteristics of actors and groups influencing collaboration and conflict, which we examine as potential boundaries. This review identified five sets of characteristics – membership, rank, core-periphery, ethnicity, and geospatial – that we supplement with additional characteristics by reflecting on the broader criminal network literature, most notably in the scholarship on gangs. We conclude with a research agenda for the study of conflict and collaboration across boundaries that can be applied to the study of OMCGs, gangs, and organized criminal groups.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48272,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Criminal Justice\",\"volume\":\"97 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102346\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Criminal Justice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0047235224001958\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Criminal Justice","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0047235224001958","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

可以沿着帮派与涉及非法毒品生产和分销、枪支贩运和严重暴力犯罪等犯罪活动的有组织犯罪之间的连续体来对付非法摩托车团伙。研究OMCGs的方法,就像研究更广泛的帮派一样,倾向于关注个人层面的犯罪行为,而对社会网络结构和动态的性质和范围关注有限。在本文中,我们关注社会网络分析(SNA)在分析和理解OMCG俱乐部内部和俱乐部之间的冲突和合作方面的效用。我们回顾了应用SNA来研究omcg背景下的合作或冲突的现有文献。我们的目标是确定影响协作和冲突的行为者和群体的许多特征,我们将其作为潜在的边界进行研究。这篇综述确定了五组特征——成员、等级、核心边缘、种族和地理空间——我们通过反思更广泛的犯罪网络文献,尤其是关于帮派的学术研究,补充了其他特征。最后,我们提出了一项研究跨界冲突与合作的议程,可应用于对OMCGs、帮派和有组织犯罪集团的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The utility of social network analysis to examine conflict and collaboration across boundaries: A review and research agenda for Outlaw Motorcycle Gangs
Outlaw motorcycle gangs (OMCGs) may be approached along a continuum between gangs and organized crime involving criminal activities such as illicit drug production and distribution, firearms trafficking, and serious violent crime. Approaches to the study of OMCGs, as with the study of gangs more broadly, tend to focus on offending at the individual level, with limited focus on the nature and extent of social network structure and dynamics. In this paper, we focus on the utility of social network analysis (SNA) for analyzing and understanding conflict and collaboration within and between OMCG clubs. We review the existing literature applying SNA to examine collaboration or conflict in the context of OMCGs. Our aim is to identify the many characteristics of actors and groups influencing collaboration and conflict, which we examine as potential boundaries. This review identified five sets of characteristics – membership, rank, core-periphery, ethnicity, and geospatial – that we supplement with additional characteristics by reflecting on the broader criminal network literature, most notably in the scholarship on gangs. We conclude with a research agenda for the study of conflict and collaboration across boundaries that can be applied to the study of OMCGs, gangs, and organized criminal groups.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Criminal Justice
Journal of Criminal Justice CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY-
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
9.10%
发文量
93
审稿时长
23 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Criminal Justice is an international journal intended to fill the present need for the dissemination of new information, ideas and methods, to both practitioners and academicians in the criminal justice area. The Journal is concerned with all aspects of the criminal justice system in terms of their relationships to each other. Although materials are presented relating to crime and the individual elements of the criminal justice system, the emphasis of the Journal is to tie together the functioning of these elements and to illustrate the effects of their interactions. Articles that reflect the application of new disciplines or analytical methodologies to the problems of criminal justice are of special interest. Since the purpose of the Journal is to provide a forum for the dissemination of new ideas, new information, and the application of new methods to the problems and functions of the criminal justice system, the Journal emphasizes innovation and creative thought of the highest quality.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信