家庭医疗保健服务的专业人员如何应对一种新的基于信任的工作方式?-故事对话研究

H. Moen Wallin , L.E. Kjekshus , D. Saplacan , Z. Pajalic
{"title":"家庭医疗保健服务的专业人员如何应对一种新的基于信任的工作方式?-故事对话研究","authors":"H. Moen Wallin ,&nbsp;L.E. Kjekshus ,&nbsp;D. Saplacan ,&nbsp;Z. Pajalic","doi":"10.1016/j.ssaho.2024.101251","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study explored professionals' reflections regarding a new, trust-based way of working in municipal home-based services, in relation to the concept of trust. The new way of working represents an alternative to the purchaser–provider split model. Instead of decisions being made on behalf of the service user by an intermediate purchaser, small, interdisciplinary teams are to cooperate to make decisions. The study is qualitative and exploratory, and data were collected via workshops with home-based service professionals. Eight professionals with different backgrounds participated. Data were both collected and analyzed using the story dialogue method. Adopting a wider view on trust, this study contributes by discussing the results according to three interrelated platforms of trust: relational/interactional, pre-contractual, and structural/institutional. The results indicate that to build trust after transferring autonomy to horizontally organized teams, work needs to be done to develop relational and pre-contractual trust before the new practice has been formalized in new routines, new structural trust bases have been formed, and trust has become institutionally embedded.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":74826,"journal":{"name":"Social sciences & humanities open","volume":"11 ","pages":"Article 101251"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How do professionals in home-based health care services react to a new trust-based way of working? – A story dialogue study\",\"authors\":\"H. Moen Wallin ,&nbsp;L.E. Kjekshus ,&nbsp;D. Saplacan ,&nbsp;Z. Pajalic\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ssaho.2024.101251\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This study explored professionals' reflections regarding a new, trust-based way of working in municipal home-based services, in relation to the concept of trust. The new way of working represents an alternative to the purchaser–provider split model. Instead of decisions being made on behalf of the service user by an intermediate purchaser, small, interdisciplinary teams are to cooperate to make decisions. The study is qualitative and exploratory, and data were collected via workshops with home-based service professionals. Eight professionals with different backgrounds participated. Data were both collected and analyzed using the story dialogue method. Adopting a wider view on trust, this study contributes by discussing the results according to three interrelated platforms of trust: relational/interactional, pre-contractual, and structural/institutional. The results indicate that to build trust after transferring autonomy to horizontally organized teams, work needs to be done to develop relational and pre-contractual trust before the new practice has been formalized in new routines, new structural trust bases have been formed, and trust has become institutionally embedded.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74826,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Social sciences & humanities open\",\"volume\":\"11 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101251\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Social sciences & humanities open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590291124004480\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social sciences & humanities open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590291124004480","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究探讨了专业人士对市政居家服务中以信任为基础的新工作方式的思考,与信任的概念有关。新的工作方式代表了购买者-提供者分割模型的另一种选择。代替由中间购买者代表服务用户做出决策,小型的跨学科团队将合作做出决策。该研究是定性的和探索性的,数据是通过与家庭服务专业人员的研讨会收集的。八位不同背景的专业人士参与。采用故事对话法收集和分析数据。本研究采用更广泛的信任视角,根据三个相互关联的信任平台:关系/互动、前契约和结构/制度来讨论结果。研究结果表明,要在自主性转移到水平组织团队后建立信任,需要在新的实践在新的惯例中正式形成之前,在新的结构性信任基础形成之前,在信任成为制度嵌入之前,做一些工作来发展关系信任和契约前信任。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
How do professionals in home-based health care services react to a new trust-based way of working? – A story dialogue study
This study explored professionals' reflections regarding a new, trust-based way of working in municipal home-based services, in relation to the concept of trust. The new way of working represents an alternative to the purchaser–provider split model. Instead of decisions being made on behalf of the service user by an intermediate purchaser, small, interdisciplinary teams are to cooperate to make decisions. The study is qualitative and exploratory, and data were collected via workshops with home-based service professionals. Eight professionals with different backgrounds participated. Data were both collected and analyzed using the story dialogue method. Adopting a wider view on trust, this study contributes by discussing the results according to three interrelated platforms of trust: relational/interactional, pre-contractual, and structural/institutional. The results indicate that to build trust after transferring autonomy to horizontally organized teams, work needs to be done to develop relational and pre-contractual trust before the new practice has been formalized in new routines, new structural trust bases have been formed, and trust has become institutionally embedded.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Social sciences & humanities open
Social sciences & humanities open Psychology (General), Decision Sciences (General), Social Sciences (General)
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
159 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信