粉煤灰合成磁性沸石水处理效能及再生研究

Q3 Materials Science
Sofi Buzukashvili , Roberto Sommerville , Ozan Kökkılıç , Philippe Ouzilleau , Neil A. Rowson , Kristian E. Waters
{"title":"粉煤灰合成磁性沸石水处理效能及再生研究","authors":"Sofi Buzukashvili ,&nbsp;Roberto Sommerville ,&nbsp;Ozan Kökkılıç ,&nbsp;Philippe Ouzilleau ,&nbsp;Neil A. Rowson ,&nbsp;Kristian E. Waters","doi":"10.1016/j.jciso.2024.100127","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study investigates novel synthetic magnetic zeolites from coal fly ash (CFA) and laboratory-grade LTA zeolite enhanced with nano magnetite particles for the remediation of heavy metal ions (Pb<sup>2+</sup>, Cu<sup>2+</sup>, Zn<sup>2+</sup>, Ni<sup>2+</sup>) from wastewater. Utilizing a continuous flow system with a laboratory scale Wet High Intensity Magnetic Separator (WHIMS), heavy metal removal and magnetic particles’ recovery from the treated solution was investigated in a process that could be appropriate to real-world systems. The adsorption performance was investigated under various operational conditions, maintaining a consistent selectivity order of Pb &gt; Cu &gt; Zn &gt; Ni, repeating the selectivity order found in previous study of magnetic CFA zeolite in batch systems. Moreover, magnetic CFA zeolite was shown to be a more effective adsorbent when compared to magnetic LTA zeolite. Thus, when tested in continuous flow system under selected conditions, magnetic CFA zeolite removed 63 % Pb, 37 % Cu, 13 % Zn, and 7 % Ni while magnetic LTA zeolite removed 25 % Pb, 16 % Cu, 6 % Zn, and 3 % Ni. Furthermore, treated solution that passed through WHIMS did not contain any zeolite particles, as they were successfully captured in the metal grid.</div><div>Additionally, regeneration of metal-laden magnetic zeolites through desorption experiments was investigated by enhancing the ion-exchange process using a saturated NaCl solution. The results indicated that Pb, Zn, and Ni ions were fully desorbed from magnetic zeolite, while approximately 70 % of the Cu remained to the sample. The Cu remained in the sample may be attributed to its partial adsorption onto the carbonized binder, a highly oxygenated graphenic structure, which does not readily release the adsorbed Cu ions. As these findings highlight the difference between adsorption and desorption selectivity order, further investigation into the topic would be beneficial.</div><div>This research underscores the operational advantages of using magnetic LTA and CFA zeolites in industrial water treatment applications, illustrating their high adsorption capacity and straightforward desorption processes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":73541,"journal":{"name":"JCIS open","volume":"17 ","pages":"Article 100127"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring efficiency and regeneration of magnetic zeolite synthesized from coal fly ash for water treatment applications\",\"authors\":\"Sofi Buzukashvili ,&nbsp;Roberto Sommerville ,&nbsp;Ozan Kökkılıç ,&nbsp;Philippe Ouzilleau ,&nbsp;Neil A. Rowson ,&nbsp;Kristian E. Waters\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jciso.2024.100127\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This study investigates novel synthetic magnetic zeolites from coal fly ash (CFA) and laboratory-grade LTA zeolite enhanced with nano magnetite particles for the remediation of heavy metal ions (Pb<sup>2+</sup>, Cu<sup>2+</sup>, Zn<sup>2+</sup>, Ni<sup>2+</sup>) from wastewater. Utilizing a continuous flow system with a laboratory scale Wet High Intensity Magnetic Separator (WHIMS), heavy metal removal and magnetic particles’ recovery from the treated solution was investigated in a process that could be appropriate to real-world systems. The adsorption performance was investigated under various operational conditions, maintaining a consistent selectivity order of Pb &gt; Cu &gt; Zn &gt; Ni, repeating the selectivity order found in previous study of magnetic CFA zeolite in batch systems. Moreover, magnetic CFA zeolite was shown to be a more effective adsorbent when compared to magnetic LTA zeolite. Thus, when tested in continuous flow system under selected conditions, magnetic CFA zeolite removed 63 % Pb, 37 % Cu, 13 % Zn, and 7 % Ni while magnetic LTA zeolite removed 25 % Pb, 16 % Cu, 6 % Zn, and 3 % Ni. Furthermore, treated solution that passed through WHIMS did not contain any zeolite particles, as they were successfully captured in the metal grid.</div><div>Additionally, regeneration of metal-laden magnetic zeolites through desorption experiments was investigated by enhancing the ion-exchange process using a saturated NaCl solution. The results indicated that Pb, Zn, and Ni ions were fully desorbed from magnetic zeolite, while approximately 70 % of the Cu remained to the sample. The Cu remained in the sample may be attributed to its partial adsorption onto the carbonized binder, a highly oxygenated graphenic structure, which does not readily release the adsorbed Cu ions. As these findings highlight the difference between adsorption and desorption selectivity order, further investigation into the topic would be beneficial.</div><div>This research underscores the operational advantages of using magnetic LTA and CFA zeolites in industrial water treatment applications, illustrating their high adsorption capacity and straightforward desorption processes.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73541,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JCIS open\",\"volume\":\"17 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100127\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JCIS open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666934X24000278\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Materials Science\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JCIS open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666934X24000278","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Materials Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究了以粉煤灰为原料合成的新型磁性沸石(CFA)和实验室级LTA沸石(纳米磁铁矿颗粒增强)对废水中重金属离子(Pb2+, Cu2+, Zn2+, Ni2+)的修复效果。利用带有实验室规模的湿式高强度磁选机(WHIMS)的连续流系统,研究了从处理过的溶液中去除重金属和回收磁性颗粒的过程,该过程适用于实际系统。考察了不同操作条件下的吸附性能,保持了一致的Pb和gt的选择性顺序;铜比;锌比;Ni,重复了之前在批处理系统中发现的磁性CFA沸石的选择性顺序。此外,与磁性LTA沸石相比,磁性CFA沸石是一种更有效的吸附剂。因此,当在选定条件下的连续流系统中进行测试时,磁性CFA沸石去除63%的Pb, 37%的Cu, 13%的Zn和7%的Ni,而磁性LTA沸石去除25%的Pb, 16%的Cu, 6%的Zn和3%的Ni。此外,经过处理的溶液通过WHIMS不含有任何沸石颗粒,因为它们被成功地捕获在金属网格中。此外,通过解吸实验,利用饱和NaCl溶液增强离子交换过程,研究了载金属磁性沸石的再生。结果表明,Pb、Zn和Ni离子被磁性沸石完全解吸,而约70%的Cu离子留在了样品中。铜留在样品中可能是由于其部分吸附在碳化粘合剂上,这是一种高度氧化的石墨结构,不易释放被吸附的铜离子。由于这些发现突出了吸附和解吸选择性顺序的差异,因此对该主题的进一步研究将是有益的。本研究强调了磁性LTA和CFA沸石在工业水处理应用中的操作优势,说明了它们的高吸附能力和简单的解吸过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Exploring efficiency and regeneration of magnetic zeolite synthesized from coal fly ash for water treatment applications

Exploring efficiency and regeneration of magnetic zeolite synthesized from coal fly ash for water treatment applications
This study investigates novel synthetic magnetic zeolites from coal fly ash (CFA) and laboratory-grade LTA zeolite enhanced with nano magnetite particles for the remediation of heavy metal ions (Pb2+, Cu2+, Zn2+, Ni2+) from wastewater. Utilizing a continuous flow system with a laboratory scale Wet High Intensity Magnetic Separator (WHIMS), heavy metal removal and magnetic particles’ recovery from the treated solution was investigated in a process that could be appropriate to real-world systems. The adsorption performance was investigated under various operational conditions, maintaining a consistent selectivity order of Pb > Cu > Zn > Ni, repeating the selectivity order found in previous study of magnetic CFA zeolite in batch systems. Moreover, magnetic CFA zeolite was shown to be a more effective adsorbent when compared to magnetic LTA zeolite. Thus, when tested in continuous flow system under selected conditions, magnetic CFA zeolite removed 63 % Pb, 37 % Cu, 13 % Zn, and 7 % Ni while magnetic LTA zeolite removed 25 % Pb, 16 % Cu, 6 % Zn, and 3 % Ni. Furthermore, treated solution that passed through WHIMS did not contain any zeolite particles, as they were successfully captured in the metal grid.
Additionally, regeneration of metal-laden magnetic zeolites through desorption experiments was investigated by enhancing the ion-exchange process using a saturated NaCl solution. The results indicated that Pb, Zn, and Ni ions were fully desorbed from magnetic zeolite, while approximately 70 % of the Cu remained to the sample. The Cu remained in the sample may be attributed to its partial adsorption onto the carbonized binder, a highly oxygenated graphenic structure, which does not readily release the adsorbed Cu ions. As these findings highlight the difference between adsorption and desorption selectivity order, further investigation into the topic would be beneficial.
This research underscores the operational advantages of using magnetic LTA and CFA zeolites in industrial water treatment applications, illustrating their high adsorption capacity and straightforward desorption processes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
JCIS open
JCIS open Physical and Theoretical Chemistry, Colloid and Surface Chemistry, Surfaces, Coatings and Films
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
36 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信