按语言划分:对隔离语言学习环境下教师观点的系统回顾

IF 3.9 1区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Flora Woltran , Susanne Schwab
{"title":"按语言划分:对隔离语言学习环境下教师观点的系统回顾","authors":"Flora Woltran ,&nbsp;Susanne Schwab","doi":"10.1016/j.tate.2025.104939","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Countries are increasingly adopting policies that segregate students by language proficiency, facing criticism for potentially reinforcing inequalities. This article provides a systematic review of 24 empirical studies published between 2014 and 2023, focusing on educators' experiences in segregated language learning settings (SLLS). The findings show that many teachers strive to support students' multilingualism and use their agency to counteract the adverse effects of SLLS. However, educators often hold monolingual ideologies, which leads them to overlook the benefits of utilizing students' full linguistic abilities. The findings underscore the urgent need to promote critical language awareness in educational policy and practice.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48430,"journal":{"name":"Teaching and Teacher Education","volume":"156 ","pages":"Article 104939"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Divided by language: A systematic review of teacher views in segregated language learning settings\",\"authors\":\"Flora Woltran ,&nbsp;Susanne Schwab\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.tate.2025.104939\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Countries are increasingly adopting policies that segregate students by language proficiency, facing criticism for potentially reinforcing inequalities. This article provides a systematic review of 24 empirical studies published between 2014 and 2023, focusing on educators' experiences in segregated language learning settings (SLLS). The findings show that many teachers strive to support students' multilingualism and use their agency to counteract the adverse effects of SLLS. However, educators often hold monolingual ideologies, which leads them to overlook the benefits of utilizing students' full linguistic abilities. The findings underscore the urgent need to promote critical language awareness in educational policy and practice.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48430,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Teaching and Teacher Education\",\"volume\":\"156 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104939\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Teaching and Teacher Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0742051X25000150\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Teaching and Teacher Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0742051X25000150","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

各国越来越多地采取根据语言能力将学生隔离开来的政策,面临着可能加剧不平等的批评。本文对2014年至2023年间发表的24项实证研究进行了系统回顾,重点关注教育工作者在隔离语言学习环境(SLLS)中的经验。研究结果表明,许多教师努力支持学生的多语能力,并利用他们的代理来抵消SLLS的不利影响。然而,教育工作者往往持有单一语言的意识形态,这导致他们忽视了充分利用学生语言能力的好处。研究结果强调了在教育政策和实践中提高批判性语言意识的迫切需要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Divided by language: A systematic review of teacher views in segregated language learning settings
Countries are increasingly adopting policies that segregate students by language proficiency, facing criticism for potentially reinforcing inequalities. This article provides a systematic review of 24 empirical studies published between 2014 and 2023, focusing on educators' experiences in segregated language learning settings (SLLS). The findings show that many teachers strive to support students' multilingualism and use their agency to counteract the adverse effects of SLLS. However, educators often hold monolingual ideologies, which leads them to overlook the benefits of utilizing students' full linguistic abilities. The findings underscore the urgent need to promote critical language awareness in educational policy and practice.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Teaching and Teacher Education
Teaching and Teacher Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
12.80%
发文量
294
审稿时长
86 days
期刊介绍: Teaching and Teacher Education is an international journal concerned primarily with teachers, teaching, and/or teacher education situated in an international perspective and context. The journal focuses on early childhood through high school (secondary education), teacher preparation, along with higher education concerning teacher professional development and/or teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education is a multidisciplinary journal committed to no single approach, discipline, methodology, or paradigm. The journal welcomes varied approaches (qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods) to empirical research; also publishing high quality systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Manuscripts should enhance, build upon, and/or extend the boundaries of theory, research, and/or practice in teaching and teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education does not publish unsolicited Book Reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信