比较亚麻纤维/生物聚合物编织复合材料与碳纤维增强的部分绿色替代品:机械性能与可持续性

IF 5.3 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, COMPOSITES
Olivia H. Margoto, Abbas S. Milani
{"title":"比较亚麻纤维/生物聚合物编织复合材料与碳纤维增强的部分绿色替代品:机械性能与可持续性","authors":"Olivia H. Margoto,&nbsp;Abbas S. Milani","doi":"10.1016/j.jcomc.2024.100547","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Natural fibre/biopolymer matrix, known as green/fully sustainable, composites are emerging as alternatives to non-sustainable or partially sustainable composites, while ideally targeting similar material properties. This study first characterizes and compares thermo-mechanical performance of novel green composites made of Flax Fibre (FF) reinforced in thermosetting bioresin options, fabricated via two different manufacturing techniques. Namely, flax fibre-reinforced bioepoxy (Bioepoxy/35 %FF) woven biocomposite was fabricated via vacuum infusion, while FF-reinforced (bio)Polyfurfuryl Alcohol (PFA) woven prepreg was consolidated through vacuum bagging (PFA/45 %FF) as the second option. Additionally, for design comparisons, Carbon Fibre (CF)-PFA (PFA/60 %CF), as well as hybrid FF-CF-based PFA (PFA/45 %FF-15 %CF) samples were fabricated to understand the performance difference between the green composite options versus the latter partially sustainable or hybrid design alternatives. Results demonstrated that, despite their required different manufacturing techniques, Bioepoxy/35 %FF and PFA/60 %FF provided very comparable density, tensile strength, and impact properties. Both biocomposites outperformed the CF-added designs under damping property (by 150 %) at low frequency and specific energy absorption property (by 37 %), thanks to the unique micro-architecture of flax fibre that enhances deformation energy dissipation through inter- and intra-cell walls friction and internal failure mechanisms. However, incorporating 15 % of CF into PFA/FF (i.e. hybrid PFA/45 %FF-15 %CF) increased the tensile strength by 130 % and the tensile modulus by 90 %, while keeping a similar impact energy absorption as the fully flax-based biocomposite options. The fully CF-based PFA (as a least sustainable option among the tested samples) revealed the highest tensile properties, hardness, and thermal stability, clearly highlighting the necessity for formal trade-off analyses during design.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34525,"journal":{"name":"Composites Part C Open Access","volume":"16 ","pages":"Article 100547"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparing flax fibre/biopolymer woven composites with carbon fibre-enhanced, partially green alternatives: Mechanical performance versus sustainability\",\"authors\":\"Olivia H. Margoto,&nbsp;Abbas S. Milani\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jcomc.2024.100547\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Natural fibre/biopolymer matrix, known as green/fully sustainable, composites are emerging as alternatives to non-sustainable or partially sustainable composites, while ideally targeting similar material properties. This study first characterizes and compares thermo-mechanical performance of novel green composites made of Flax Fibre (FF) reinforced in thermosetting bioresin options, fabricated via two different manufacturing techniques. Namely, flax fibre-reinforced bioepoxy (Bioepoxy/35 %FF) woven biocomposite was fabricated via vacuum infusion, while FF-reinforced (bio)Polyfurfuryl Alcohol (PFA) woven prepreg was consolidated through vacuum bagging (PFA/45 %FF) as the second option. Additionally, for design comparisons, Carbon Fibre (CF)-PFA (PFA/60 %CF), as well as hybrid FF-CF-based PFA (PFA/45 %FF-15 %CF) samples were fabricated to understand the performance difference between the green composite options versus the latter partially sustainable or hybrid design alternatives. Results demonstrated that, despite their required different manufacturing techniques, Bioepoxy/35 %FF and PFA/60 %FF provided very comparable density, tensile strength, and impact properties. Both biocomposites outperformed the CF-added designs under damping property (by 150 %) at low frequency and specific energy absorption property (by 37 %), thanks to the unique micro-architecture of flax fibre that enhances deformation energy dissipation through inter- and intra-cell walls friction and internal failure mechanisms. However, incorporating 15 % of CF into PFA/FF (i.e. hybrid PFA/45 %FF-15 %CF) increased the tensile strength by 130 % and the tensile modulus by 90 %, while keeping a similar impact energy absorption as the fully flax-based biocomposite options. The fully CF-based PFA (as a least sustainable option among the tested samples) revealed the highest tensile properties, hardness, and thermal stability, clearly highlighting the necessity for formal trade-off analyses during design.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":34525,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Composites Part C Open Access\",\"volume\":\"16 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100547\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Composites Part C Open Access\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666682024001166\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MATERIALS SCIENCE, COMPOSITES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Composites Part C Open Access","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666682024001166","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, COMPOSITES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

天然纤维/生物聚合物基质,被称为绿色/完全可持续的复合材料,正在成为不可持续或部分可持续复合材料的替代品,同时理想地针对类似的材料特性。本研究首先表征并比较了新型绿色复合材料的热机械性能,该复合材料由亚麻纤维(FF)通过两种不同的制造技术在热固性生物树脂中增强而成。采用真空灌注法制备亚麻纤维增强生物环氧树脂(bioepoxy / 35% FF)编织型生物复合材料,采用真空袋装(PFA/ 45% FF)法制备FF增强(生物)聚糠醇(PFA)编织型预浸料。此外,为了进行设计比较,制作了碳纤维(CF)-PFA (PFA/ 60% CF)以及基于ff -CF的混合PFA (PFA/ 45% ff - 15% CF)样品,以了解绿色复合材料选择与后者部分可持续或混合设计方案之间的性能差异。结果表明,尽管他们需要不同的制造技术,生物环氧树脂/ 35% FF和PFA/ 60% FF提供非常相似的密度,拉伸强度和冲击性能。两种生物复合材料在低频阻尼性能(150%)和比能量吸收性能(37%)方面都优于添加cf的设计,这要归功于亚麻纤维独特的微结构,通过细胞壁间和细胞壁内摩擦和内部破坏机制增强了变形能量耗散。然而,将15%的CF加入到PFA/FF(即混合PFA/ 45% FF- 15% CF)中,拉伸强度提高了130%,拉伸模量提高了90%,同时保持了与全亚麻基生物复合材料相似的冲击能量吸收。完全基于cf的PFA(作为测试样品中最不可持续的选择)显示出最高的拉伸性能,硬度和热稳定性,清楚地强调了在设计过程中进行正式权衡分析的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparing flax fibre/biopolymer woven composites with carbon fibre-enhanced, partially green alternatives: Mechanical performance versus sustainability
Natural fibre/biopolymer matrix, known as green/fully sustainable, composites are emerging as alternatives to non-sustainable or partially sustainable composites, while ideally targeting similar material properties. This study first characterizes and compares thermo-mechanical performance of novel green composites made of Flax Fibre (FF) reinforced in thermosetting bioresin options, fabricated via two different manufacturing techniques. Namely, flax fibre-reinforced bioepoxy (Bioepoxy/35 %FF) woven biocomposite was fabricated via vacuum infusion, while FF-reinforced (bio)Polyfurfuryl Alcohol (PFA) woven prepreg was consolidated through vacuum bagging (PFA/45 %FF) as the second option. Additionally, for design comparisons, Carbon Fibre (CF)-PFA (PFA/60 %CF), as well as hybrid FF-CF-based PFA (PFA/45 %FF-15 %CF) samples were fabricated to understand the performance difference between the green composite options versus the latter partially sustainable or hybrid design alternatives. Results demonstrated that, despite their required different manufacturing techniques, Bioepoxy/35 %FF and PFA/60 %FF provided very comparable density, tensile strength, and impact properties. Both biocomposites outperformed the CF-added designs under damping property (by 150 %) at low frequency and specific energy absorption property (by 37 %), thanks to the unique micro-architecture of flax fibre that enhances deformation energy dissipation through inter- and intra-cell walls friction and internal failure mechanisms. However, incorporating 15 % of CF into PFA/FF (i.e. hybrid PFA/45 %FF-15 %CF) increased the tensile strength by 130 % and the tensile modulus by 90 %, while keeping a similar impact energy absorption as the fully flax-based biocomposite options. The fully CF-based PFA (as a least sustainable option among the tested samples) revealed the highest tensile properties, hardness, and thermal stability, clearly highlighting the necessity for formal trade-off analyses during design.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Composites Part C Open Access
Composites Part C Open Access Engineering-Mechanical Engineering
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
2.40%
发文量
96
审稿时长
55 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信