超快速双参数MRI在前列腺癌评估中的应用:与常规多参数MRI相比的诊断性能和图像质量

IF 2.9 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Antonia M. Pausch , Vivien Filleböck , Clara Elsner , Niels J. Rupp , Daniel Eberli , Andreas M. Hötker
{"title":"超快速双参数MRI在前列腺癌评估中的应用:与常规多参数MRI相比的诊断性能和图像质量","authors":"Antonia M. Pausch ,&nbsp;Vivien Filleböck ,&nbsp;Clara Elsner ,&nbsp;Niels J. Rupp ,&nbsp;Daniel Eberli ,&nbsp;Andreas M. Hötker","doi":"10.1016/j.ejro.2025.100635","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>To compare the diagnostic performance and image quality of a deep-learning-assisted ultra-fast biparametric MRI (bpMRI) with the conventional multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) for the diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This prospective single-center study enrolled 123 biopsy-naïve patients undergoing conventional mpMRI and additionally ultra-fast bpMRI at 3 T between 06/2023–02/2024. Two radiologists (R1: 4 years and R2: 3 years of experience) independently assigned PI-RADS scores (PI-RADS v2.1) and assessed image quality (mPI-QUAL score) in two blinded study readouts. Weighted Cohen’s Kappa (κ) was calculated to evaluate inter-reader agreement. Diagnostic performance was analyzed using clinical data and histopathological results from clinically indicated biopsies.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Inter-reader agreement was good for both mpMRI (κ = 0.83) and ultra-fast bpMRI (κ = 0.87). Both readers demonstrated high sensitivity (≥94 %/≥91 %, R1/R2) and NPV (≥96 %/≥95 %) for csPCa detection using both protocols. The more experienced reader mostly showed notably higher specificity (≥77 %/≥53 %), PPV (≥62 %/≥45 %), and diagnostic accuracy (≥82 %/≥65 %) compared to the less experienced reader. There was no significant difference in the diagnostic performance of correctly identifying csPCa between both protocols (p &gt; 0.05). The ultra-fast bpMRI protocol had significantly better image quality ratings (p &lt; 0.001) and achieved a reduction in scan time of 80 % compared to conventional mpMRI.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Deep-learning-assisted ultra-fast bpMRI protocols offer a promising alternative to conventional mpMRI for diagnosing csPCa in biopsy-naïve patients with comparable inter-reader agreement and diagnostic performance at superior image quality. However, reader experience remains essential for diagnostic performance.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":38076,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Radiology Open","volume":"14 ","pages":"Article 100635"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ultra-fast biparametric MRI in prostate cancer assessment: Diagnostic performance and image quality compared to conventional multiparametric MRI\",\"authors\":\"Antonia M. Pausch ,&nbsp;Vivien Filleböck ,&nbsp;Clara Elsner ,&nbsp;Niels J. Rupp ,&nbsp;Daniel Eberli ,&nbsp;Andreas M. Hötker\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ejro.2025.100635\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>To compare the diagnostic performance and image quality of a deep-learning-assisted ultra-fast biparametric MRI (bpMRI) with the conventional multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) for the diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This prospective single-center study enrolled 123 biopsy-naïve patients undergoing conventional mpMRI and additionally ultra-fast bpMRI at 3 T between 06/2023–02/2024. Two radiologists (R1: 4 years and R2: 3 years of experience) independently assigned PI-RADS scores (PI-RADS v2.1) and assessed image quality (mPI-QUAL score) in two blinded study readouts. Weighted Cohen’s Kappa (κ) was calculated to evaluate inter-reader agreement. Diagnostic performance was analyzed using clinical data and histopathological results from clinically indicated biopsies.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Inter-reader agreement was good for both mpMRI (κ = 0.83) and ultra-fast bpMRI (κ = 0.87). Both readers demonstrated high sensitivity (≥94 %/≥91 %, R1/R2) and NPV (≥96 %/≥95 %) for csPCa detection using both protocols. The more experienced reader mostly showed notably higher specificity (≥77 %/≥53 %), PPV (≥62 %/≥45 %), and diagnostic accuracy (≥82 %/≥65 %) compared to the less experienced reader. There was no significant difference in the diagnostic performance of correctly identifying csPCa between both protocols (p &gt; 0.05). The ultra-fast bpMRI protocol had significantly better image quality ratings (p &lt; 0.001) and achieved a reduction in scan time of 80 % compared to conventional mpMRI.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Deep-learning-assisted ultra-fast bpMRI protocols offer a promising alternative to conventional mpMRI for diagnosing csPCa in biopsy-naïve patients with comparable inter-reader agreement and diagnostic performance at superior image quality. However, reader experience remains essential for diagnostic performance.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":38076,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Radiology Open\",\"volume\":\"14 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100635\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Radiology Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352047725000024\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Radiology Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352047725000024","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的比较深度学习辅助下的超快速双参数MRI (bpMRI)与常规多参数MRI (mpMRI)对临床显著性前列腺癌(csPCa)的诊断性能和图像质量。方法本前瞻性单中心研究纳入123例biopsy-naïve患者,于2023年6月至2024年2月期间在3 T接受常规mpMRI和超快速bpMRI。两名放射科医生(R1: 4年经验,R2: 3年经验)在两项盲法研究中独立分配PI-RADS评分(PI-RADS v2.1)并评估图像质量(mPI-QUAL评分)。计算加权科恩Kappa (κ)来评估读者间的一致性。诊断性能分析使用临床数据和组织病理学结果从临床指示活检。结果mpMRI和超快速bpMRI的读间一致性均较好(κ = 0.83)。两种读卡器均表现出高灵敏度(≥94 %/≥91 %,R1/R2)和NPV(≥96 %/≥95 %)。与经验不足的读者相比,经验丰富的读者大多表现出更高的特异性(≥77 %/≥53 %),PPV(≥62 %/≥45 %)和诊断准确性(≥82 %/≥65 %)。两种方案在正确识别csPCa的诊断性能上无显著差异(p >; 0.05)。超高速bpMRI方案具有更好的图像质量评级(p <; 0.001),与传统mpMRI相比,扫描时间减少了80% %。结论深度学习辅助的超快速bpMRI方案在诊断biopsy-naïve患者的csPCa方面具有相当的读者间一致性和更高的图像质量的诊断性能,是传统mpMRI的一个有希望的替代方案。然而,读者体验仍然是诊断性能的关键。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Ultra-fast biparametric MRI in prostate cancer assessment: Diagnostic performance and image quality compared to conventional multiparametric MRI

Purpose

To compare the diagnostic performance and image quality of a deep-learning-assisted ultra-fast biparametric MRI (bpMRI) with the conventional multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) for the diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa).

Methods

This prospective single-center study enrolled 123 biopsy-naïve patients undergoing conventional mpMRI and additionally ultra-fast bpMRI at 3 T between 06/2023–02/2024. Two radiologists (R1: 4 years and R2: 3 years of experience) independently assigned PI-RADS scores (PI-RADS v2.1) and assessed image quality (mPI-QUAL score) in two blinded study readouts. Weighted Cohen’s Kappa (κ) was calculated to evaluate inter-reader agreement. Diagnostic performance was analyzed using clinical data and histopathological results from clinically indicated biopsies.

Results

Inter-reader agreement was good for both mpMRI (κ = 0.83) and ultra-fast bpMRI (κ = 0.87). Both readers demonstrated high sensitivity (≥94 %/≥91 %, R1/R2) and NPV (≥96 %/≥95 %) for csPCa detection using both protocols. The more experienced reader mostly showed notably higher specificity (≥77 %/≥53 %), PPV (≥62 %/≥45 %), and diagnostic accuracy (≥82 %/≥65 %) compared to the less experienced reader. There was no significant difference in the diagnostic performance of correctly identifying csPCa between both protocols (p > 0.05). The ultra-fast bpMRI protocol had significantly better image quality ratings (p < 0.001) and achieved a reduction in scan time of 80 % compared to conventional mpMRI.

Conclusion

Deep-learning-assisted ultra-fast bpMRI protocols offer a promising alternative to conventional mpMRI for diagnosing csPCa in biopsy-naïve patients with comparable inter-reader agreement and diagnostic performance at superior image quality. However, reader experience remains essential for diagnostic performance.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European Journal of Radiology Open
European Journal of Radiology Open Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
5.00%
发文量
55
审稿时长
51 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信