权力关系如何影响怀孕和分娩:法国的知识、保健和工作

Q3 Medicine
E. Boulet , R. Guilloux
{"title":"权力关系如何影响怀孕和分娩:法国的知识、保健和工作","authors":"E. Boulet ,&nbsp;R. Guilloux","doi":"10.1016/j.jemep.2024.101032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Based on a constructivist approach to human reproduction, this focus analyses the ways childbirth in mainland France is framed by natalist and health policies and by social inequalities. Beyond the tension between naturalness and technicality, birth is subject to a diversity of power relations. We focus here on power dynamics around class, sex and race, which impact the access to and the quality of perinatal care. Drawing on qualitative and quantitative studies, we show that women and couples have unequal access to information during pregnancy, for several reasons. Firstly, the standardised length of antenatal consultations. Secondly, differences in understanding of information that is implicitly adapted to the most educated and affluent social classes. Thirdly, the ambivalence of the information, which oscillates between autonomy and injunction in terms of how the baby should be delivered and fed. Fourthly, pregnant workers have little knowledge of their reproductive rights. We also show that the provision of perinatal care is unequal despite a supposedly universal health insurance system. Racially minoritized women are subject to more complex administrative procedures and to more medical interventions. In addition, health and diet recommendations, and alternative birthing methods, are better suited to the individualistic logic and material conditions of the middle classes than those of the working classes. As far as working conditions are concerned, women in arduous occupations use sick leave as a means of protection, whereas women in less arduous occupations take maternity leave later than the other women. Lastly, men's involvement in domestic tasks during women's pregnancies remains occasional and limited to the physical dimension of those tasks, even more so as the assignment of women to domestic labour is reinforced by healthcare professionals. Finally, we contend that equal care for all pregnant women can only be achieved if the social dimensions of health are fully taken into account.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":37707,"journal":{"name":"Ethics, Medicine and Public Health","volume":"33 ","pages":"Article 101032"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How power relations impact pregnancy and childbirth: Knowledge, Healthcare and Work in France\",\"authors\":\"E. Boulet ,&nbsp;R. Guilloux\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jemep.2024.101032\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Based on a constructivist approach to human reproduction, this focus analyses the ways childbirth in mainland France is framed by natalist and health policies and by social inequalities. Beyond the tension between naturalness and technicality, birth is subject to a diversity of power relations. We focus here on power dynamics around class, sex and race, which impact the access to and the quality of perinatal care. Drawing on qualitative and quantitative studies, we show that women and couples have unequal access to information during pregnancy, for several reasons. Firstly, the standardised length of antenatal consultations. Secondly, differences in understanding of information that is implicitly adapted to the most educated and affluent social classes. Thirdly, the ambivalence of the information, which oscillates between autonomy and injunction in terms of how the baby should be delivered and fed. Fourthly, pregnant workers have little knowledge of their reproductive rights. We also show that the provision of perinatal care is unequal despite a supposedly universal health insurance system. Racially minoritized women are subject to more complex administrative procedures and to more medical interventions. In addition, health and diet recommendations, and alternative birthing methods, are better suited to the individualistic logic and material conditions of the middle classes than those of the working classes. As far as working conditions are concerned, women in arduous occupations use sick leave as a means of protection, whereas women in less arduous occupations take maternity leave later than the other women. Lastly, men's involvement in domestic tasks during women's pregnancies remains occasional and limited to the physical dimension of those tasks, even more so as the assignment of women to domestic labour is reinforced by healthcare professionals. Finally, we contend that equal care for all pregnant women can only be achieved if the social dimensions of health are fully taken into account.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":37707,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ethics, Medicine and Public Health\",\"volume\":\"33 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101032\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ethics, Medicine and Public Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352552524000677\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ethics, Medicine and Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352552524000677","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本专题以人类生殖的建构主义方法为基础,分析了法国大陆的生育受到生育主义和卫生政策以及社会不平等的影响。在自然与技术性之间的紧张关系之外,出生受制于多种权力关系。我们在这里关注的是围绕阶级、性别和种族的权力动态,它们会影响围产期护理的获得和质量。根据定性和定量研究,我们表明,由于几个原因,妇女和夫妇在怀孕期间获得信息的机会不平等。首先,产前检查的标准化时间。其次,对信息的理解存在差异,这种差异隐含地适应于受教育程度最高和最富裕的社会阶层。第三,信息的矛盾心理,在如何分娩和喂养婴儿方面,在自主和强制之间摇摆不定。第四,怀孕的工人对自己的生殖权利知之甚少。我们还表明,提供围产期护理是不平等的,尽管所谓的全民健康保险制度。在种族上处于少数地位的妇女面临更复杂的行政程序和更多的医疗干预。此外,健康和饮食建议以及替代生育方法更适合中产阶级的个人主义逻辑和物质条件,而不是工人阶级。就工作条件而言,从事艰苦职业的妇女利用病假作为一种保护手段,而从事较不艰苦职业的妇女则比其他妇女晚休产假。最后,在妇女怀孕期间,男子参与家务劳动仍然是偶然的,而且仅限于这些家务的体力方面,特别是在保健专业人员加强分配妇女从事家务劳动的情况下。最后,我们认为,只有充分考虑到健康的社会层面,才能实现对所有孕妇的平等照顾。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
How power relations impact pregnancy and childbirth: Knowledge, Healthcare and Work in France
Based on a constructivist approach to human reproduction, this focus analyses the ways childbirth in mainland France is framed by natalist and health policies and by social inequalities. Beyond the tension between naturalness and technicality, birth is subject to a diversity of power relations. We focus here on power dynamics around class, sex and race, which impact the access to and the quality of perinatal care. Drawing on qualitative and quantitative studies, we show that women and couples have unequal access to information during pregnancy, for several reasons. Firstly, the standardised length of antenatal consultations. Secondly, differences in understanding of information that is implicitly adapted to the most educated and affluent social classes. Thirdly, the ambivalence of the information, which oscillates between autonomy and injunction in terms of how the baby should be delivered and fed. Fourthly, pregnant workers have little knowledge of their reproductive rights. We also show that the provision of perinatal care is unequal despite a supposedly universal health insurance system. Racially minoritized women are subject to more complex administrative procedures and to more medical interventions. In addition, health and diet recommendations, and alternative birthing methods, are better suited to the individualistic logic and material conditions of the middle classes than those of the working classes. As far as working conditions are concerned, women in arduous occupations use sick leave as a means of protection, whereas women in less arduous occupations take maternity leave later than the other women. Lastly, men's involvement in domestic tasks during women's pregnancies remains occasional and limited to the physical dimension of those tasks, even more so as the assignment of women to domestic labour is reinforced by healthcare professionals. Finally, we contend that equal care for all pregnant women can only be achieved if the social dimensions of health are fully taken into account.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ethics, Medicine and Public Health
Ethics, Medicine and Public Health Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
107
审稿时长
42 days
期刊介绍: This review aims to compare approaches to medical ethics and bioethics in two forms, Anglo-Saxon (Ethics, Medicine and Public Health) and French (Ethique, Médecine et Politiques Publiques). Thus, in their native languages, the authors will present research on the legitimacy of the practice and appreciation of the consequences of acts towards patients as compared to the limits acceptable by the community, as illustrated by the democratic debate.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信