抗击麻疹:转变战略以应对新出现的挑战和不公平现象

Q3 Medicine
F. Pasadyn, N. Mamo, A. Caplan
{"title":"抗击麻疹:转变战略以应对新出现的挑战和不公平现象","authors":"F. Pasadyn,&nbsp;N. Mamo,&nbsp;A. Caplan","doi":"10.1016/j.jemep.2025.101047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Measles outbreaks remain a significant global health challenge, particularly in low-resource settings, despite the availability of safe and effective vaccines. The resurgence of measles underscores the critical need to address underlying health inequities that hinder vaccination coverage, such as political instability, growing distrust of all vaccines, economic collapse, and weak healthcare systems. Vulnerable populations, including unvaccinated children and pregnant individuals, are at heightened risk for severe complications, especially in regions with limited access to healthcare and vaccination services. The persistent disparities in vaccine uptake, driven by social determinants of health like ethnicity, socioeconomic status, and geographic location, exacerbate these risks. This emphasizes the need for equitable vaccination strategies that ensure access to life-saving immunizations for all, particularly those in hard-to-reach areas.</div></div><div><h3>Approaches and future strategies</h3><div>Targeted approaches, such as Supplemental Immunization Activities (SIAs) and the use of innovative vaccine delivery technologies, like Microarray Patches (MAPs), show promise in reducing access barriers. Additionally, policies rooted in inclusivity that foster community engagement, health literacy, and infrastructure development are essential for increasing measles vaccination rates.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Achieving global measles control requires a commitment to a multifaceted strategy that combines equitable policy, innovative technologies, and strengthened healthcare systems to ensure no one is left behind in the fight against measles.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":37707,"journal":{"name":"Ethics, Medicine and Public Health","volume":"33 ","pages":"Article 101047"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Battling measles: Shifting strategies to meet emerging challenges and inequities\",\"authors\":\"F. Pasadyn,&nbsp;N. Mamo,&nbsp;A. Caplan\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jemep.2025.101047\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Measles outbreaks remain a significant global health challenge, particularly in low-resource settings, despite the availability of safe and effective vaccines. The resurgence of measles underscores the critical need to address underlying health inequities that hinder vaccination coverage, such as political instability, growing distrust of all vaccines, economic collapse, and weak healthcare systems. Vulnerable populations, including unvaccinated children and pregnant individuals, are at heightened risk for severe complications, especially in regions with limited access to healthcare and vaccination services. The persistent disparities in vaccine uptake, driven by social determinants of health like ethnicity, socioeconomic status, and geographic location, exacerbate these risks. This emphasizes the need for equitable vaccination strategies that ensure access to life-saving immunizations for all, particularly those in hard-to-reach areas.</div></div><div><h3>Approaches and future strategies</h3><div>Targeted approaches, such as Supplemental Immunization Activities (SIAs) and the use of innovative vaccine delivery technologies, like Microarray Patches (MAPs), show promise in reducing access barriers. Additionally, policies rooted in inclusivity that foster community engagement, health literacy, and infrastructure development are essential for increasing measles vaccination rates.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Achieving global measles control requires a commitment to a multifaceted strategy that combines equitable policy, innovative technologies, and strengthened healthcare systems to ensure no one is left behind in the fight against measles.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":37707,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ethics, Medicine and Public Health\",\"volume\":\"33 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101047\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ethics, Medicine and Public Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352552525000064\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ethics, Medicine and Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352552525000064","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:尽管有安全有效的疫苗,但麻疹疫情仍然是一项重大的全球卫生挑战,特别是在资源匮乏的地区。麻疹的死灰复燃凸显出迫切需要解决阻碍疫苗接种覆盖的潜在卫生不公平现象,例如政治不稳定、对所有疫苗的不信任日益加剧、经济崩溃和卫生保健系统薄弱。弱势群体,包括未接种疫苗的儿童和孕妇,发生严重并发症的风险更高,特别是在获得卫生保健和疫苗接种服务有限的地区。由种族、社会经济地位和地理位置等健康社会决定因素驱动的疫苗接种方面的持续差异加剧了这些风险。这强调需要制定公平的疫苗接种战略,确保所有人,特别是那些难以到达地区的人获得挽救生命的免疫接种。方法和未来战略有针对性的方法,如补充免疫活动(SIAs)和使用创新的疫苗递送技术,如微阵列贴片(MAPs),在减少获取障碍方面显示出希望。此外,以包容性为基础的政策,促进社区参与、卫生知识普及和基础设施发展,对于提高麻疹疫苗接种率至关重要。实现全球麻疹控制需要致力于一项多方面的战略,将公平的政策、创新的技术和加强的卫生保健系统结合起来,以确保在防治麻疹的斗争中不让任何一个人掉队。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Battling measles: Shifting strategies to meet emerging challenges and inequities

Background

Measles outbreaks remain a significant global health challenge, particularly in low-resource settings, despite the availability of safe and effective vaccines. The resurgence of measles underscores the critical need to address underlying health inequities that hinder vaccination coverage, such as political instability, growing distrust of all vaccines, economic collapse, and weak healthcare systems. Vulnerable populations, including unvaccinated children and pregnant individuals, are at heightened risk for severe complications, especially in regions with limited access to healthcare and vaccination services. The persistent disparities in vaccine uptake, driven by social determinants of health like ethnicity, socioeconomic status, and geographic location, exacerbate these risks. This emphasizes the need for equitable vaccination strategies that ensure access to life-saving immunizations for all, particularly those in hard-to-reach areas.

Approaches and future strategies

Targeted approaches, such as Supplemental Immunization Activities (SIAs) and the use of innovative vaccine delivery technologies, like Microarray Patches (MAPs), show promise in reducing access barriers. Additionally, policies rooted in inclusivity that foster community engagement, health literacy, and infrastructure development are essential for increasing measles vaccination rates.

Conclusion

Achieving global measles control requires a commitment to a multifaceted strategy that combines equitable policy, innovative technologies, and strengthened healthcare systems to ensure no one is left behind in the fight against measles.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ethics, Medicine and Public Health
Ethics, Medicine and Public Health Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
107
审稿时长
42 days
期刊介绍: This review aims to compare approaches to medical ethics and bioethics in two forms, Anglo-Saxon (Ethics, Medicine and Public Health) and French (Ethique, Médecine et Politiques Publiques). Thus, in their native languages, the authors will present research on the legitimacy of the practice and appreciation of the consequences of acts towards patients as compared to the limits acceptable by the community, as illustrated by the democratic debate.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信