设计一个本地弹性市场,用于从连接到配电网的电力消费者手中回购容量

IF 4.4 3区 经济学 Q3 ENERGY & FUELS
Charalampos Ziras , Jan Martin Zepter , Shahatphong Pechrak , Georgios Tsaousoglou
{"title":"设计一个本地弹性市场,用于从连接到配电网的电力消费者手中回购容量","authors":"Charalampos Ziras ,&nbsp;Jan Martin Zepter ,&nbsp;Shahatphong Pechrak ,&nbsp;Georgios Tsaousoglou","doi":"10.1016/j.jup.2025.101889","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The proliferation of flexible resources in the electric distribution network and their active management have already started to cause congestion problems, mainly in areas with significant electric vehicle penetration. In this work, we study the reduction of usable capacity as a congestion management measure in a local flexibility market context. Using an extensive two-year residential charging dataset from Denmark, we highlight the problems caused by the almost 50% non-utilized capacity on an aggregated level of household chargers. We discuss and address various market design challenges and the implications of free excess capacity by treating aggregated capacity as a divisible good that can be traded between a distribution system operator (DSO) and flexibility service providers. The use of <em>capacity blocks</em> streamlines service delivery and overcomes many of the challenges of using explicit services. Finally, we show empirically that a simple, uniform pricing, two-stage auction significantly reduces DSO payments and mitigates the issue of excessive profit margins compared to a single-stage auction.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23554,"journal":{"name":"Utilities Policy","volume":"93 ","pages":"Article 101889"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Designing a local flexibility market for buying back capacity from electricity consumers connected to the distribution network\",\"authors\":\"Charalampos Ziras ,&nbsp;Jan Martin Zepter ,&nbsp;Shahatphong Pechrak ,&nbsp;Georgios Tsaousoglou\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jup.2025.101889\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The proliferation of flexible resources in the electric distribution network and their active management have already started to cause congestion problems, mainly in areas with significant electric vehicle penetration. In this work, we study the reduction of usable capacity as a congestion management measure in a local flexibility market context. Using an extensive two-year residential charging dataset from Denmark, we highlight the problems caused by the almost 50% non-utilized capacity on an aggregated level of household chargers. We discuss and address various market design challenges and the implications of free excess capacity by treating aggregated capacity as a divisible good that can be traded between a distribution system operator (DSO) and flexibility service providers. The use of <em>capacity blocks</em> streamlines service delivery and overcomes many of the challenges of using explicit services. Finally, we show empirically that a simple, uniform pricing, two-stage auction significantly reduces DSO payments and mitigates the issue of excessive profit margins compared to a single-stage auction.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23554,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Utilities Policy\",\"volume\":\"93 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101889\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Utilities Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0957178725000049\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Utilities Policy","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0957178725000049","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

配电网络中灵活资源的激增及其主动管理已经开始造成拥堵问题,主要是在电动汽车大量普及的地区。在本研究中,我们研究了在局部弹性市场环境下可用容量的减少作为拥堵管理措施。使用来自丹麦的广泛的两年住宅充电数据集,我们强调了在家庭充电器的总体水平上,近50%的未使用容量所造成的问题。我们讨论并解决了各种市场设计挑战和自由过剩容量的影响,将总容量视为可分割的商品,可以在配电系统运营商(DSO)和灵活性服务提供商之间进行交易。容量块的使用简化了服务交付,并克服了使用显式服务的许多挑战。最后,我们通过经验证明,与单阶段拍卖相比,简单、统一定价的两阶段拍卖显著减少了DSO支付,并缓解了利润率过高的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Designing a local flexibility market for buying back capacity from electricity consumers connected to the distribution network
The proliferation of flexible resources in the electric distribution network and their active management have already started to cause congestion problems, mainly in areas with significant electric vehicle penetration. In this work, we study the reduction of usable capacity as a congestion management measure in a local flexibility market context. Using an extensive two-year residential charging dataset from Denmark, we highlight the problems caused by the almost 50% non-utilized capacity on an aggregated level of household chargers. We discuss and address various market design challenges and the implications of free excess capacity by treating aggregated capacity as a divisible good that can be traded between a distribution system operator (DSO) and flexibility service providers. The use of capacity blocks streamlines service delivery and overcomes many of the challenges of using explicit services. Finally, we show empirically that a simple, uniform pricing, two-stage auction significantly reduces DSO payments and mitigates the issue of excessive profit margins compared to a single-stage auction.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Utilities Policy
Utilities Policy ENERGY & FUELS-ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
10.00%
发文量
94
审稿时长
66 days
期刊介绍: Utilities Policy is deliberately international, interdisciplinary, and intersectoral. Articles address utility trends and issues in both developed and developing economies. Authors and reviewers come from various disciplines, including economics, political science, sociology, law, finance, accounting, management, and engineering. Areas of focus include the utility and network industries providing essential electricity, natural gas, water and wastewater, solid waste, communications, broadband, postal, and public transportation services. Utilities Policy invites submissions that apply various quantitative and qualitative methods. Contributions are welcome from both established and emerging scholars as well as accomplished practitioners. Interdisciplinary, comparative, and applied works are encouraged. Submissions to the journal should have a clear focus on governance, performance, and/or analysis of public utilities with an aim toward informing the policymaking process and providing recommendations as appropriate. Relevant topics and issues include but are not limited to industry structures and ownership, market design and dynamics, economic development, resource planning, system modeling, accounting and finance, infrastructure investment, supply and demand efficiency, strategic management and productivity, network operations and integration, supply chains, adaptation and flexibility, service-quality standards, benchmarking and metrics, benefit-cost analysis, behavior and incentives, pricing and demand response, economic and environmental regulation, regulatory performance and impact, restructuring and deregulation, and policy institutions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信