Charalampos Ziras , Jan Martin Zepter , Shahatphong Pechrak , Georgios Tsaousoglou
{"title":"设计一个本地弹性市场,用于从连接到配电网的电力消费者手中回购容量","authors":"Charalampos Ziras , Jan Martin Zepter , Shahatphong Pechrak , Georgios Tsaousoglou","doi":"10.1016/j.jup.2025.101889","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The proliferation of flexible resources in the electric distribution network and their active management have already started to cause congestion problems, mainly in areas with significant electric vehicle penetration. In this work, we study the reduction of usable capacity as a congestion management measure in a local flexibility market context. Using an extensive two-year residential charging dataset from Denmark, we highlight the problems caused by the almost 50% non-utilized capacity on an aggregated level of household chargers. We discuss and address various market design challenges and the implications of free excess capacity by treating aggregated capacity as a divisible good that can be traded between a distribution system operator (DSO) and flexibility service providers. The use of <em>capacity blocks</em> streamlines service delivery and overcomes many of the challenges of using explicit services. Finally, we show empirically that a simple, uniform pricing, two-stage auction significantly reduces DSO payments and mitigates the issue of excessive profit margins compared to a single-stage auction.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23554,"journal":{"name":"Utilities Policy","volume":"93 ","pages":"Article 101889"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Designing a local flexibility market for buying back capacity from electricity consumers connected to the distribution network\",\"authors\":\"Charalampos Ziras , Jan Martin Zepter , Shahatphong Pechrak , Georgios Tsaousoglou\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jup.2025.101889\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The proliferation of flexible resources in the electric distribution network and their active management have already started to cause congestion problems, mainly in areas with significant electric vehicle penetration. In this work, we study the reduction of usable capacity as a congestion management measure in a local flexibility market context. Using an extensive two-year residential charging dataset from Denmark, we highlight the problems caused by the almost 50% non-utilized capacity on an aggregated level of household chargers. We discuss and address various market design challenges and the implications of free excess capacity by treating aggregated capacity as a divisible good that can be traded between a distribution system operator (DSO) and flexibility service providers. The use of <em>capacity blocks</em> streamlines service delivery and overcomes many of the challenges of using explicit services. Finally, we show empirically that a simple, uniform pricing, two-stage auction significantly reduces DSO payments and mitigates the issue of excessive profit margins compared to a single-stage auction.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23554,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Utilities Policy\",\"volume\":\"93 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101889\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Utilities Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0957178725000049\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Utilities Policy","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0957178725000049","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Designing a local flexibility market for buying back capacity from electricity consumers connected to the distribution network
The proliferation of flexible resources in the electric distribution network and their active management have already started to cause congestion problems, mainly in areas with significant electric vehicle penetration. In this work, we study the reduction of usable capacity as a congestion management measure in a local flexibility market context. Using an extensive two-year residential charging dataset from Denmark, we highlight the problems caused by the almost 50% non-utilized capacity on an aggregated level of household chargers. We discuss and address various market design challenges and the implications of free excess capacity by treating aggregated capacity as a divisible good that can be traded between a distribution system operator (DSO) and flexibility service providers. The use of capacity blocks streamlines service delivery and overcomes many of the challenges of using explicit services. Finally, we show empirically that a simple, uniform pricing, two-stage auction significantly reduces DSO payments and mitigates the issue of excessive profit margins compared to a single-stage auction.
期刊介绍:
Utilities Policy is deliberately international, interdisciplinary, and intersectoral. Articles address utility trends and issues in both developed and developing economies. Authors and reviewers come from various disciplines, including economics, political science, sociology, law, finance, accounting, management, and engineering. Areas of focus include the utility and network industries providing essential electricity, natural gas, water and wastewater, solid waste, communications, broadband, postal, and public transportation services.
Utilities Policy invites submissions that apply various quantitative and qualitative methods. Contributions are welcome from both established and emerging scholars as well as accomplished practitioners. Interdisciplinary, comparative, and applied works are encouraged. Submissions to the journal should have a clear focus on governance, performance, and/or analysis of public utilities with an aim toward informing the policymaking process and providing recommendations as appropriate. Relevant topics and issues include but are not limited to industry structures and ownership, market design and dynamics, economic development, resource planning, system modeling, accounting and finance, infrastructure investment, supply and demand efficiency, strategic management and productivity, network operations and integration, supply chains, adaptation and flexibility, service-quality standards, benchmarking and metrics, benefit-cost analysis, behavior and incentives, pricing and demand response, economic and environmental regulation, regulatory performance and impact, restructuring and deregulation, and policy institutions.