Rachel M. Krause , Angela Y.S. Park , Christopher V. Hawkins , Aote Xin
{"title":"市政在减少当地温室气体排放方面的努力是否“起作用”?对美国城市的初步评估","authors":"Rachel M. Krause , Angela Y.S. Park , Christopher V. Hawkins , Aote Xin","doi":"10.1016/j.cities.2025.105769","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Implicit in cities' decisions to engage in climate actions is the expectation that these efforts will result in significant greenhouse gas emissions reductions. Little research, however, has investigated this presumed cause-and-effect relationship in a manner that is both empirical and generalizable. This, in turn, challenges the design of evidence-based policy recommendations. We apply a difference-in-differences (DiD) approach to examine the impact that two frequently recommended capacity-building interventions—completing a greenhouse gas emissions (GHG) inventory and employing dedicated sustainability staff—have on the fossil fuel carbon dioxide (FFCO<sub>2</sub>) emissions of the cities that have undertaken them. This is enabled by the construction of a unique dataset that combines city-level FFCO<sub>2</sub> emission estimates in 2010 and 2015 with multi-year survey-based data indicating the adoption of relevant local policy actions. Findings offer evidence that the completion of a community-wide emissions inventory facilitates local action that, even in a relatively short timeframe, significantly reduces emissions from onsite residential sources.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48405,"journal":{"name":"Cities","volume":"159 ","pages":"Article 105769"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Do municipal efforts ‘move the needle’ in reducing local greenhouse gas emissions? An initial assessment of US cities\",\"authors\":\"Rachel M. Krause , Angela Y.S. Park , Christopher V. Hawkins , Aote Xin\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cities.2025.105769\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Implicit in cities' decisions to engage in climate actions is the expectation that these efforts will result in significant greenhouse gas emissions reductions. Little research, however, has investigated this presumed cause-and-effect relationship in a manner that is both empirical and generalizable. This, in turn, challenges the design of evidence-based policy recommendations. We apply a difference-in-differences (DiD) approach to examine the impact that two frequently recommended capacity-building interventions—completing a greenhouse gas emissions (GHG) inventory and employing dedicated sustainability staff—have on the fossil fuel carbon dioxide (FFCO<sub>2</sub>) emissions of the cities that have undertaken them. This is enabled by the construction of a unique dataset that combines city-level FFCO<sub>2</sub> emission estimates in 2010 and 2015 with multi-year survey-based data indicating the adoption of relevant local policy actions. Findings offer evidence that the completion of a community-wide emissions inventory facilitates local action that, even in a relatively short timeframe, significantly reduces emissions from onsite residential sources.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48405,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cities\",\"volume\":\"159 \",\"pages\":\"Article 105769\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cities\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264275125000691\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"URBAN STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cities","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264275125000691","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"URBAN STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Do municipal efforts ‘move the needle’ in reducing local greenhouse gas emissions? An initial assessment of US cities
Implicit in cities' decisions to engage in climate actions is the expectation that these efforts will result in significant greenhouse gas emissions reductions. Little research, however, has investigated this presumed cause-and-effect relationship in a manner that is both empirical and generalizable. This, in turn, challenges the design of evidence-based policy recommendations. We apply a difference-in-differences (DiD) approach to examine the impact that two frequently recommended capacity-building interventions—completing a greenhouse gas emissions (GHG) inventory and employing dedicated sustainability staff—have on the fossil fuel carbon dioxide (FFCO2) emissions of the cities that have undertaken them. This is enabled by the construction of a unique dataset that combines city-level FFCO2 emission estimates in 2010 and 2015 with multi-year survey-based data indicating the adoption of relevant local policy actions. Findings offer evidence that the completion of a community-wide emissions inventory facilitates local action that, even in a relatively short timeframe, significantly reduces emissions from onsite residential sources.
期刊介绍:
Cities offers a comprehensive range of articles on all aspects of urban policy. It provides an international and interdisciplinary platform for the exchange of ideas and information between urban planners and policy makers from national and local government, non-government organizations, academia and consultancy. The primary aims of the journal are to analyse and assess past and present urban development and management as a reflection of effective, ineffective and non-existent planning policies; and the promotion of the implementation of appropriate urban policies in both the developed and the developing world.