市政在减少当地温室气体排放方面的努力是否“起作用”?对美国城市的初步评估

IF 6.6 1区 经济学 Q1 URBAN STUDIES
Rachel M. Krause , Angela Y.S. Park , Christopher V. Hawkins , Aote Xin
{"title":"市政在减少当地温室气体排放方面的努力是否“起作用”?对美国城市的初步评估","authors":"Rachel M. Krause ,&nbsp;Angela Y.S. Park ,&nbsp;Christopher V. Hawkins ,&nbsp;Aote Xin","doi":"10.1016/j.cities.2025.105769","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Implicit in cities' decisions to engage in climate actions is the expectation that these efforts will result in significant greenhouse gas emissions reductions. Little research, however, has investigated this presumed cause-and-effect relationship in a manner that is both empirical and generalizable. This, in turn, challenges the design of evidence-based policy recommendations. We apply a difference-in-differences (DiD) approach to examine the impact that two frequently recommended capacity-building interventions—completing a greenhouse gas emissions (GHG) inventory and employing dedicated sustainability staff—have on the fossil fuel carbon dioxide (FFCO<sub>2</sub>) emissions of the cities that have undertaken them. This is enabled by the construction of a unique dataset that combines city-level FFCO<sub>2</sub> emission estimates in 2010 and 2015 with multi-year survey-based data indicating the adoption of relevant local policy actions. Findings offer evidence that the completion of a community-wide emissions inventory facilitates local action that, even in a relatively short timeframe, significantly reduces emissions from onsite residential sources.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48405,"journal":{"name":"Cities","volume":"159 ","pages":"Article 105769"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Do municipal efforts ‘move the needle’ in reducing local greenhouse gas emissions? An initial assessment of US cities\",\"authors\":\"Rachel M. Krause ,&nbsp;Angela Y.S. Park ,&nbsp;Christopher V. Hawkins ,&nbsp;Aote Xin\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cities.2025.105769\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Implicit in cities' decisions to engage in climate actions is the expectation that these efforts will result in significant greenhouse gas emissions reductions. Little research, however, has investigated this presumed cause-and-effect relationship in a manner that is both empirical and generalizable. This, in turn, challenges the design of evidence-based policy recommendations. We apply a difference-in-differences (DiD) approach to examine the impact that two frequently recommended capacity-building interventions—completing a greenhouse gas emissions (GHG) inventory and employing dedicated sustainability staff—have on the fossil fuel carbon dioxide (FFCO<sub>2</sub>) emissions of the cities that have undertaken them. This is enabled by the construction of a unique dataset that combines city-level FFCO<sub>2</sub> emission estimates in 2010 and 2015 with multi-year survey-based data indicating the adoption of relevant local policy actions. Findings offer evidence that the completion of a community-wide emissions inventory facilitates local action that, even in a relatively short timeframe, significantly reduces emissions from onsite residential sources.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48405,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cities\",\"volume\":\"159 \",\"pages\":\"Article 105769\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cities\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264275125000691\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"URBAN STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cities","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264275125000691","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"URBAN STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

城市参与气候行动的决定隐含着这样一种期望:这些努力将显著减少温室气体排放。然而,很少有研究以一种既经验又可概括的方式调查这种假定的因果关系。这反过来又挑战了基于证据的政策建议的设计。我们采用差异中的差异(DiD)方法来研究两种经常被推荐的能力建设干预措施——完成温室气体排放(GHG)清单和雇用专门的可持续发展工作人员——对实施这些措施的城市的化石燃料二氧化碳(FFCO2)排放的影响。这是通过构建一个独特的数据集来实现的,该数据集将2010年和2015年的城市级FFCO2排放估算与多年的基于调查的数据结合起来,表明采取了相关的地方政策行动。研究结果表明,社区范围内的排放清单的完成有助于地方采取行动,即使在相对较短的时间内,也能显著减少现场居民排放。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Do municipal efforts ‘move the needle’ in reducing local greenhouse gas emissions? An initial assessment of US cities
Implicit in cities' decisions to engage in climate actions is the expectation that these efforts will result in significant greenhouse gas emissions reductions. Little research, however, has investigated this presumed cause-and-effect relationship in a manner that is both empirical and generalizable. This, in turn, challenges the design of evidence-based policy recommendations. We apply a difference-in-differences (DiD) approach to examine the impact that two frequently recommended capacity-building interventions—completing a greenhouse gas emissions (GHG) inventory and employing dedicated sustainability staff—have on the fossil fuel carbon dioxide (FFCO2) emissions of the cities that have undertaken them. This is enabled by the construction of a unique dataset that combines city-level FFCO2 emission estimates in 2010 and 2015 with multi-year survey-based data indicating the adoption of relevant local policy actions. Findings offer evidence that the completion of a community-wide emissions inventory facilitates local action that, even in a relatively short timeframe, significantly reduces emissions from onsite residential sources.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cities
Cities URBAN STUDIES-
CiteScore
11.20
自引率
9.00%
发文量
517
期刊介绍: Cities offers a comprehensive range of articles on all aspects of urban policy. It provides an international and interdisciplinary platform for the exchange of ideas and information between urban planners and policy makers from national and local government, non-government organizations, academia and consultancy. The primary aims of the journal are to analyse and assess past and present urban development and management as a reflection of effective, ineffective and non-existent planning policies; and the promotion of the implementation of appropriate urban policies in both the developed and the developing world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信