网络、学校和学生人口统计水平对网络改进社区对学生阅读结果的影响

IF 2.6 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Anna E. Premo , Christian Schunn
{"title":"网络、学校和学生人口统计水平对网络改进社区对学生阅读结果的影响","authors":"Anna E. Premo ,&nbsp;Christian Schunn","doi":"10.1016/j.stueduc.2025.101451","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Networked Improvement Communities, or NICs, are a type of research-practice partnership that have become a popular approach to large-scale educational change. Despite the growing prevalence of NICs in education, however, there is little research on their effects on student outcomes, particularly with attention to their multi-level complexity and whether they lead to more equitable outcomes. In this study, we test an approach for evaluating the effects of network participation on the growth of student reading outcomes in a large NIC relative to a set of matched non-network schools. Overall, schools participating in the NIC showed growth in reading outcomes that outpaced matched schools in the state by an additional 5 %. Benefits varied by school, which could be explained by levels of teacher participation and depth of implementation. In addition, historically disadvantaged students especially benefited from NIC participation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47539,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Educational Evaluation","volume":"85 ","pages":"Article 101451"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Network, school, and student demographic level effects of a networked improvement community on student reading outcomes\",\"authors\":\"Anna E. Premo ,&nbsp;Christian Schunn\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.stueduc.2025.101451\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Networked Improvement Communities, or NICs, are a type of research-practice partnership that have become a popular approach to large-scale educational change. Despite the growing prevalence of NICs in education, however, there is little research on their effects on student outcomes, particularly with attention to their multi-level complexity and whether they lead to more equitable outcomes. In this study, we test an approach for evaluating the effects of network participation on the growth of student reading outcomes in a large NIC relative to a set of matched non-network schools. Overall, schools participating in the NIC showed growth in reading outcomes that outpaced matched schools in the state by an additional 5 %. Benefits varied by school, which could be explained by levels of teacher participation and depth of implementation. In addition, historically disadvantaged students especially benefited from NIC participation.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47539,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Studies in Educational Evaluation\",\"volume\":\"85 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101451\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Studies in Educational Evaluation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191491X25000082\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in Educational Evaluation","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191491X25000082","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

网络改进社区(nic)是一种研究与实践的伙伴关系,已经成为大规模教育变革的一种流行方法。然而,尽管NICs在教育中越来越普遍,但关于其对学生成绩的影响的研究却很少,特别是关注其多层次的复杂性以及它们是否会导致更公平的结果。在本研究中,我们测试了一种评估网络参与对大型NIC中学生阅读结果增长的影响的方法,而不是一组匹配的非网络学校。总体而言,参加NIC的学校在阅读成绩方面的增长速度比该州的同类学校高出5% %。效益因学校而异,这可以通过教师参与程度和实施深度来解释。此外,历史上处于不利地位的学生尤其受益于NIC的参与。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Network, school, and student demographic level effects of a networked improvement community on student reading outcomes
Networked Improvement Communities, or NICs, are a type of research-practice partnership that have become a popular approach to large-scale educational change. Despite the growing prevalence of NICs in education, however, there is little research on their effects on student outcomes, particularly with attention to their multi-level complexity and whether they lead to more equitable outcomes. In this study, we test an approach for evaluating the effects of network participation on the growth of student reading outcomes in a large NIC relative to a set of matched non-network schools. Overall, schools participating in the NIC showed growth in reading outcomes that outpaced matched schools in the state by an additional 5 %. Benefits varied by school, which could be explained by levels of teacher participation and depth of implementation. In addition, historically disadvantaged students especially benefited from NIC participation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
6.50%
发文量
90
审稿时长
62 days
期刊介绍: Studies in Educational Evaluation publishes original reports of evaluation studies. Four types of articles are published by the journal: (a) Empirical evaluation studies representing evaluation practice in educational systems around the world; (b) Theoretical reflections and empirical studies related to issues involved in the evaluation of educational programs, educational institutions, educational personnel and student assessment; (c) Articles summarizing the state-of-the-art concerning specific topics in evaluation in general or in a particular country or group of countries; (d) Book reviews and brief abstracts of evaluation studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信