评价文本质量：教师对学生写作的看法

IF 2.6 2区教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH

Studies in Educational Evaluation Pub Date : 2025-01-22 DOI:10.1016/j.stueduc.2025.101444

Anat Stavans , Sara Zadunaisky Ehrlich

{"title":"评价文本质量：教师对学生写作的看法","authors":"Anat Stavans , Sara Zadunaisky Ehrlich","doi":"10.1016/j.stueduc.2025.101444","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study provides a view of elementary school experienced and novice teachers’ perceptions on text quality evaluation of written products in Israel. Questionnaires explored: the perceptions of general elements adjudicated to text quality, a holistic textbased teachers’ evaluation concomitant with experts’ evaluation, and texts quality textual and linguistic indicators concordant with the experts’ ranking of the same texts. Questionnaires were collected from 204 participants (101 teacher-trainees of Elementary Education (TT), and 103 in-service teachers (T) in Elementary schools in Central Israel). The findings show that experienced (T) and novice (TT) teachers share knowledge about text quality when incipient writers are concerned. T’s evaluations diverged from the experts’ evaluations because they evaluate both process and product grounded in their knowledge and experience with writing stages of development underlying text production at different grade levels. TT converge with the experts’ “objective” evaluation because they focus on the text product.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47539,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Educational Evaluation","volume":"85 ","pages":"Article 101444"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating text quality: Teachers’ perceptions about pupils’ writing\",\"authors\":\"Anat Stavans , Sara Zadunaisky Ehrlich\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.stueduc.2025.101444\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This study provides a view of elementary school experienced and novice teachers’ perceptions on text quality evaluation of written products in Israel. Questionnaires explored: the perceptions of general elements adjudicated to text quality, a holistic textbased teachers’ evaluation concomitant with experts’ evaluation, and texts quality textual and linguistic indicators concordant with the experts’ ranking of the same texts. Questionnaires were collected from 204 participants (101 teacher-trainees of Elementary Education (TT), and 103 in-service teachers (T) in Elementary schools in Central Israel). The findings show that experienced (T) and novice (TT) teachers share knowledge about text quality when incipient writers are concerned. T’s evaluations diverged from the experts’ evaluations because they evaluate both process and product grounded in their knowledge and experience with writing stages of development underlying text production at different grade levels. TT converge with the experts’ “objective” evaluation because they focus on the text product.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47539,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Studies in Educational Evaluation\",\"volume\":\"85 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101444\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Studies in Educational Evaluation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191491X2500001X\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in Educational Evaluation","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191491X2500001X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究提供以色列小学经验教师与新手教师对书面产品文本质量评价的看法。问卷调查探讨了对文本质量判定的一般要素的感知，基于文本的教师评价与专家评价相结合的整体评价，以及与专家对同一文本的排名一致的文本质量、文本和语言指标。问卷共收集204名参与者（101名基础教育培训教师和103名以色列中部小学在职教师）。研究结果表明，当初出茅庐的写作者关注文本质量时，经验丰富的教师和新手教师对文本质量的认识是相同的。T的评估与专家的评估不同，因为他们基于他们的知识和经验来评估过程和产品，这些知识和经验是基于不同年级水平的文本生产的发展阶段。TT与专家的“客观”评价趋于一致，因为他们关注的是文本产品。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Evaluating text quality: Teachers’ perceptions about pupils’ writing

This study provides a view of elementary school experienced and novice teachers’ perceptions on text quality evaluation of written products in Israel. Questionnaires explored: the perceptions of general elements adjudicated to text quality, a holistic textbased teachers’ evaluation concomitant with experts’ evaluation, and texts quality textual and linguistic indicators concordant with the experts’ ranking of the same texts. Questionnaires were collected from 204 participants (101 teacher-trainees of Elementary Education (TT), and 103 in-service teachers (T) in Elementary schools in Central Israel). The findings show that experienced (T) and novice (TT) teachers share knowledge about text quality when incipient writers are concerned. T’s evaluations diverged from the experts’ evaluations because they evaluate both process and product grounded in their knowledge and experience with writing stages of development underlying text production at different grade levels. TT converge with the experts’ “objective” evaluation because they focus on the text product.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Studies in Educational Evaluation Multiple-

CiteScore

6.90

自引率

6.50%

发文量

审稿时长

62 days

期刊介绍： Studies in Educational Evaluation publishes original reports of evaluation studies. Four types of articles are published by the journal: (a) Empirical evaluation studies representing evaluation practice in educational systems around the world; (b) Theoretical reflections and empirical studies related to issues involved in the evaluation of educational programs, educational institutions, educational personnel and student assessment; (c) Articles summarizing the state-of-the-art concerning specific topics in evaluation in general or in a particular country or group of countries; (d) Book reviews and brief abstracts of evaluation studies.