双均值回归4/2随机波动环境下的投资机会策略

IF 3.8 3区 经济学 Q1 BUSINESS, FINANCE
Jiling Cao , Jeong-Hoon Kim , Wenqiang Liu , Wenjun Zhang
{"title":"双均值回归4/2随机波动环境下的投资机会策略","authors":"Jiling Cao ,&nbsp;Jeong-Hoon Kim ,&nbsp;Wenqiang Liu ,&nbsp;Wenjun Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.najef.2024.102358","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The investment-timing problem and the valuation of the right to take certain business initiatives in a given project (called a “real option”) have been considered by many authors under the assumption that volatility of the present value of the expected future net cash flows is stochastic. In this paper, we re-tackle these problems by assuming that the present value of the expected future net cash flows follows the double-mean-reverting 4/2 stochastic volatility model, proposed recently by Cao et al. (2023). Applying an asymptotic analysis approach outlined by Fouque et al. (2011), we obtain two approximation formulas for the value of the real option and the investment threshold, respectively. We conduct numerical experiments on sensitivity analysis of the formulas with respect to the model parameters (“Heston”- and “3/2”-factors) and the associated variables. Furthermore, we also conduct the least square Monte Carlo (LSM) simulation proposed by Longstaff and Schwartz (2001), and compare the real option values from our approximation formula with those from the LSM simulation. Our analysis shows that the relative errors are less than 0.3% in most of our cases, which justifies the appropriateness of our asymptotic approach for the model.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47831,"journal":{"name":"North American Journal of Economics and Finance","volume":"76 ","pages":"Article 102358"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Investment opportunity strategy in a double-mean-reverting 4/2 stochastic volatility environment\",\"authors\":\"Jiling Cao ,&nbsp;Jeong-Hoon Kim ,&nbsp;Wenqiang Liu ,&nbsp;Wenjun Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.najef.2024.102358\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The investment-timing problem and the valuation of the right to take certain business initiatives in a given project (called a “real option”) have been considered by many authors under the assumption that volatility of the present value of the expected future net cash flows is stochastic. In this paper, we re-tackle these problems by assuming that the present value of the expected future net cash flows follows the double-mean-reverting 4/2 stochastic volatility model, proposed recently by Cao et al. (2023). Applying an asymptotic analysis approach outlined by Fouque et al. (2011), we obtain two approximation formulas for the value of the real option and the investment threshold, respectively. We conduct numerical experiments on sensitivity analysis of the formulas with respect to the model parameters (“Heston”- and “3/2”-factors) and the associated variables. Furthermore, we also conduct the least square Monte Carlo (LSM) simulation proposed by Longstaff and Schwartz (2001), and compare the real option values from our approximation formula with those from the LSM simulation. Our analysis shows that the relative errors are less than 0.3% in most of our cases, which justifies the appropriateness of our asymptotic approach for the model.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47831,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"North American Journal of Economics and Finance\",\"volume\":\"76 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102358\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"North American Journal of Economics and Finance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1062940824002833\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"North American Journal of Economics and Finance","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1062940824002833","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在预期未来净现金流的现值波动是随机的假设下,许多作者已经考虑了投资时机问题和在给定项目中采取某些商业举措的权利的估值(称为“实物期权”)。在本文中,我们通过假设预期未来净现金流的现值遵循双均值回归4/2随机波动率模型来重新解决这些问题,该模型最近由Cao等人(2023)提出。运用Fouque et al.(2011)提出的渐近分析方法,我们分别得到了实物期权和投资阈值的两个近似公式。我们针对模型参数(“Heston”-和“3/2”-因子)和相关变量对公式进行了敏感性分析的数值实验。此外,我们还进行了Longstaff和Schwartz(2001)提出的最小二乘蒙特卡罗(LSM)模拟,并将我们的近似公式与LSM模拟的实物期权值进行了比较。我们的分析表明,在大多数情况下,相对误差小于0.3%,这证明了我们的渐近方法对模型的适用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Investment opportunity strategy in a double-mean-reverting 4/2 stochastic volatility environment
The investment-timing problem and the valuation of the right to take certain business initiatives in a given project (called a “real option”) have been considered by many authors under the assumption that volatility of the present value of the expected future net cash flows is stochastic. In this paper, we re-tackle these problems by assuming that the present value of the expected future net cash flows follows the double-mean-reverting 4/2 stochastic volatility model, proposed recently by Cao et al. (2023). Applying an asymptotic analysis approach outlined by Fouque et al. (2011), we obtain two approximation formulas for the value of the real option and the investment threshold, respectively. We conduct numerical experiments on sensitivity analysis of the formulas with respect to the model parameters (“Heston”- and “3/2”-factors) and the associated variables. Furthermore, we also conduct the least square Monte Carlo (LSM) simulation proposed by Longstaff and Schwartz (2001), and compare the real option values from our approximation formula with those from the LSM simulation. Our analysis shows that the relative errors are less than 0.3% in most of our cases, which justifies the appropriateness of our asymptotic approach for the model.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
8.30%
发文量
168
期刊介绍: The focus of the North-American Journal of Economics and Finance is on the economics of integration of goods, services, financial markets, at both regional and global levels with the role of economic policy in that process playing an important role. Both theoretical and empirical papers are welcome. Empirical and policy-related papers that rely on data and the experiences of countries outside North America are also welcome. Papers should offer concrete lessons about the ongoing process of globalization, or policy implications about how governments, domestic or international institutions, can improve the coordination of their activities. Empirical analysis should be capable of replication. Authors of accepted papers will be encouraged to supply data and computer programs.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信