残疾部门与工作有关的暴力干预措施:系统审查和系统绘图工作

IF 4.7 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL
Olivia Miller , Olivia Dobson , Tristan Casey , Sharon Newnam
{"title":"残疾部门与工作有关的暴力干预措施:系统审查和系统绘图工作","authors":"Olivia Miller ,&nbsp;Olivia Dobson ,&nbsp;Tristan Casey ,&nbsp;Sharon Newnam","doi":"10.1016/j.ssci.2024.106765","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Violence against staff is common in the healthcare sector, as are staff training interventions aiming to reduce work-related violence (WRV). However, limited research has explored the breadth of WRV interventions for staff working in the disability sector. Therefore, the current study aimed to systematically review WRV interventions for staff working in the disability sector using a systems thinking framework, PreventiMap, which is an adaption of Rasmussen’s Risk Management framework. The goal of this research was to identify opportunities to support systemic change in the sector to support the safety of workers. Using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses approach, a comprehensive search strategy and eligibility criteria were applied across five databases. After screening, a total of 22 intervention studies were included for systematic review. Included studies were synthesised narratively and using the systems thinking PreventiMap technique. The efficacy of interventions was variable, as was the methodological quality of included studies. Most intervention studies (<em>n</em> = 20, 90.1 %) explored staff training, with very few (<em>n</em> = 4, 18.2 %) exploring management or company level WRV interventions. Therefore, it is recommended that organizations implement more holistic WRV interventions that address higher system levels and evaluate their effectiveness using more rigorous designs.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21375,"journal":{"name":"Safety Science","volume":"184 ","pages":"Article 106765"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Work-related violence interventions in the disability sector: A systematic review and systems mapping exercise\",\"authors\":\"Olivia Miller ,&nbsp;Olivia Dobson ,&nbsp;Tristan Casey ,&nbsp;Sharon Newnam\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ssci.2024.106765\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Violence against staff is common in the healthcare sector, as are staff training interventions aiming to reduce work-related violence (WRV). However, limited research has explored the breadth of WRV interventions for staff working in the disability sector. Therefore, the current study aimed to systematically review WRV interventions for staff working in the disability sector using a systems thinking framework, PreventiMap, which is an adaption of Rasmussen’s Risk Management framework. The goal of this research was to identify opportunities to support systemic change in the sector to support the safety of workers. Using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses approach, a comprehensive search strategy and eligibility criteria were applied across five databases. After screening, a total of 22 intervention studies were included for systematic review. Included studies were synthesised narratively and using the systems thinking PreventiMap technique. The efficacy of interventions was variable, as was the methodological quality of included studies. Most intervention studies (<em>n</em> = 20, 90.1 %) explored staff training, with very few (<em>n</em> = 4, 18.2 %) exploring management or company level WRV interventions. Therefore, it is recommended that organizations implement more holistic WRV interventions that address higher system levels and evaluate their effectiveness using more rigorous designs.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21375,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Safety Science\",\"volume\":\"184 \",\"pages\":\"Article 106765\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Safety Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925753524003552\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Safety Science","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925753524003552","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

针对工作人员的暴力行为在保健部门很常见,旨在减少与工作有关的暴力行为的工作人员培训干预措施也很常见。然而,有限的研究探索了残疾部门工作人员的《残疾人权利公约》干预措施的广度。因此,目前的研究旨在系统地审查残疾部门工作人员的WRV干预措施,使用系统思维框架,即预防地图,这是对拉斯穆森风险管理框架的改编。本研究的目的是确定支持该部门系统性变革的机会,以支持工人的安全。使用系统评价和荟萃分析方法的首选报告项目,在五个数据库中应用了综合搜索策略和资格标准。筛选后,共纳入22项干预研究进行系统评价。纳入的研究采用叙述和系统思维的预防地图技术进行综合。干预措施的效果是可变的,纳入研究的方法学质量也是可变的。大多数干预研究(n = 20, 90.1%)探讨员工培训,很少(n = 4, 18.2%)探讨管理层或公司层面的WRV干预。因此,建议组织实施更全面的WRV干预措施,以解决更高的系统级别,并使用更严格的设计评估其有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Work-related violence interventions in the disability sector: A systematic review and systems mapping exercise
Violence against staff is common in the healthcare sector, as are staff training interventions aiming to reduce work-related violence (WRV). However, limited research has explored the breadth of WRV interventions for staff working in the disability sector. Therefore, the current study aimed to systematically review WRV interventions for staff working in the disability sector using a systems thinking framework, PreventiMap, which is an adaption of Rasmussen’s Risk Management framework. The goal of this research was to identify opportunities to support systemic change in the sector to support the safety of workers. Using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses approach, a comprehensive search strategy and eligibility criteria were applied across five databases. After screening, a total of 22 intervention studies were included for systematic review. Included studies were synthesised narratively and using the systems thinking PreventiMap technique. The efficacy of interventions was variable, as was the methodological quality of included studies. Most intervention studies (n = 20, 90.1 %) explored staff training, with very few (n = 4, 18.2 %) exploring management or company level WRV interventions. Therefore, it is recommended that organizations implement more holistic WRV interventions that address higher system levels and evaluate their effectiveness using more rigorous designs.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Safety Science
Safety Science 管理科学-工程:工业
CiteScore
13.00
自引率
9.80%
发文量
335
审稿时长
53 days
期刊介绍: Safety Science is multidisciplinary. Its contributors and its audience range from social scientists to engineers. The journal covers the physics and engineering of safety; its social, policy and organizational aspects; the assessment, management and communication of risks; the effectiveness of control and management techniques for safety; standardization, legislation, inspection, insurance, costing aspects, human behavior and safety and the like. Papers addressing the interfaces between technology, people and organizations are especially welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信