不同飞行工况下弹性对飞行作战性能的影响及机理——基于飞行模拟器实验的研究

IF 4.7 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL
Li Li, Yao Chen, Ruijie Xing
{"title":"不同飞行工况下弹性对飞行作战性能的影响及机理——基于飞行模拟器实验的研究","authors":"Li Li,&nbsp;Yao Chen,&nbsp;Ruijie Xing","doi":"10.1016/j.ssci.2024.106763","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>To investigate the influence and mechanism of resilience on flight performance under different flight situations, an experimental platform was built based on the PI135 flight simulation equipment, and three different flight situations were designed, including normal flight, single failure flight, and multiple failures flight, with the approach and landing phase as the object of the study. 27 flight cadets, who had completed the simulation flight training course and passed the assessment, were recruited as subjects to conduct the experiment. The flight operation evaluation indexes were determined, the flight operation evaluation model was constructed. Mental workload and flight operation performance of different flight situations, resilience and coping styles of flight cadets’ were measured respectively. The results of the experimental data analysis showed that there were significant differences in flight performance under three different flight scenarios, and that flight operation performance decreased with increasing mental workload. Under three different flight situations, the flight operation performance of the high resilience group was significantly better than that of the low resilience group. Moreover, as the level of mental workload increased, the decline in flight operation performance for the low resilience group was greater than that of the high resilience group. Resilience did not have a significant effect on flight operation performance under normal flight situations but had a significant positive effect on flight operation performance under non-normal flight situations, especially under multiple failure flight situations where the effect of the toughness dimension of resilience was significant. The mediating effect test showed that positive coping styles had a partial mediating effect between resilience and flight operation performance under multiple failure flight situations, with a mediating effect of 39.96%, and the mediating effect of negative coping styles was not significant.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21375,"journal":{"name":"Safety Science","volume":"184 ","pages":"Article 106763"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Influence and mechanism of resilience on flight operational performance under different flight situations: A study based on flight simulator experiments\",\"authors\":\"Li Li,&nbsp;Yao Chen,&nbsp;Ruijie Xing\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ssci.2024.106763\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>To investigate the influence and mechanism of resilience on flight performance under different flight situations, an experimental platform was built based on the PI135 flight simulation equipment, and three different flight situations were designed, including normal flight, single failure flight, and multiple failures flight, with the approach and landing phase as the object of the study. 27 flight cadets, who had completed the simulation flight training course and passed the assessment, were recruited as subjects to conduct the experiment. The flight operation evaluation indexes were determined, the flight operation evaluation model was constructed. Mental workload and flight operation performance of different flight situations, resilience and coping styles of flight cadets’ were measured respectively. The results of the experimental data analysis showed that there were significant differences in flight performance under three different flight scenarios, and that flight operation performance decreased with increasing mental workload. Under three different flight situations, the flight operation performance of the high resilience group was significantly better than that of the low resilience group. Moreover, as the level of mental workload increased, the decline in flight operation performance for the low resilience group was greater than that of the high resilience group. Resilience did not have a significant effect on flight operation performance under normal flight situations but had a significant positive effect on flight operation performance under non-normal flight situations, especially under multiple failure flight situations where the effect of the toughness dimension of resilience was significant. The mediating effect test showed that positive coping styles had a partial mediating effect between resilience and flight operation performance under multiple failure flight situations, with a mediating effect of 39.96%, and the mediating effect of negative coping styles was not significant.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21375,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Safety Science\",\"volume\":\"184 \",\"pages\":\"Article 106763\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Safety Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925753524003539\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Safety Science","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925753524003539","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

为了研究不同飞行工况下弹性对飞行性能的影响及其机理,基于PI135飞行仿真设备搭建了实验平台,设计了正常飞行、单故障飞行和多故障飞行三种不同的飞行工况,并以进近和着陆阶段为研究对象。招募27名完成模拟飞行训练课程并考核合格的飞行学员作为实验对象。确定了飞行运行评价指标,建立了飞行运行评价模型。分别测量飞行学员在不同飞行情境下的心理负荷、飞行操作绩效、心理弹性和应对方式。实验数据分析结果表明,三种不同飞行情景下飞行性能存在显著差异,飞行操作性能随心理负荷的增加而下降。在三种不同的飞行情况下,高弹性组的飞行操作绩效显著优于低弹性组。此外,随着心理负荷水平的增加,低弹性组的飞行操作绩效下降幅度大于高弹性组。在正常飞行工况下,弹性对飞行操作性能的影响不显著,但在非正常飞行工况下,弹性韧性维度对飞行操作性能有显著的正向影响,尤其是在多故障飞行工况下,弹性韧性维度的影响显著。中介效应检验显示,多失败飞行情境下,积极应对方式在弹性与飞行操作绩效之间具有部分中介作用,中介效应为39.96%,而消极应对方式的中介效应不显著。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Influence and mechanism of resilience on flight operational performance under different flight situations: A study based on flight simulator experiments
To investigate the influence and mechanism of resilience on flight performance under different flight situations, an experimental platform was built based on the PI135 flight simulation equipment, and three different flight situations were designed, including normal flight, single failure flight, and multiple failures flight, with the approach and landing phase as the object of the study. 27 flight cadets, who had completed the simulation flight training course and passed the assessment, were recruited as subjects to conduct the experiment. The flight operation evaluation indexes were determined, the flight operation evaluation model was constructed. Mental workload and flight operation performance of different flight situations, resilience and coping styles of flight cadets’ were measured respectively. The results of the experimental data analysis showed that there were significant differences in flight performance under three different flight scenarios, and that flight operation performance decreased with increasing mental workload. Under three different flight situations, the flight operation performance of the high resilience group was significantly better than that of the low resilience group. Moreover, as the level of mental workload increased, the decline in flight operation performance for the low resilience group was greater than that of the high resilience group. Resilience did not have a significant effect on flight operation performance under normal flight situations but had a significant positive effect on flight operation performance under non-normal flight situations, especially under multiple failure flight situations where the effect of the toughness dimension of resilience was significant. The mediating effect test showed that positive coping styles had a partial mediating effect between resilience and flight operation performance under multiple failure flight situations, with a mediating effect of 39.96%, and the mediating effect of negative coping styles was not significant.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Safety Science
Safety Science 管理科学-工程:工业
CiteScore
13.00
自引率
9.80%
发文量
335
审稿时长
53 days
期刊介绍: Safety Science is multidisciplinary. Its contributors and its audience range from social scientists to engineers. The journal covers the physics and engineering of safety; its social, policy and organizational aspects; the assessment, management and communication of risks; the effectiveness of control and management techniques for safety; standardization, legislation, inspection, insurance, costing aspects, human behavior and safety and the like. Papers addressing the interfaces between technology, people and organizations are especially welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信