巴润铀矿地浸铀关键工艺参数优化与辨识

Peng Qiao , Yuanqing Fan , Shengqing Xiong , Liangquan Ge , Yixuan Yao , Ruyi Wang , Hao Song , Huijie Yu , Xiaoping Ren , Zengjie Gui
{"title":"巴润铀矿地浸铀关键工艺参数优化与辨识","authors":"Peng Qiao ,&nbsp;Yuanqing Fan ,&nbsp;Shengqing Xiong ,&nbsp;Liangquan Ge ,&nbsp;Yixuan Yao ,&nbsp;Ruyi Wang ,&nbsp;Hao Song ,&nbsp;Huijie Yu ,&nbsp;Xiaoping Ren ,&nbsp;Zengjie Gui","doi":"10.1016/j.oreoa.2025.100085","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Ascertaining the optimal process parameters for in-situ leaching (ISL) of uranium is crucial for maximizing both uranium leaching rates and enhancing the production efficiency of uranium mining endeavors. Nevertheless, limited research has been conducted on the chemical composition of uranium ore within the Barun uranium deposit, with a notable absence of indoor leaching experiments and in-depth discussions pertaining to the ISL technology for uranium and the identification of optimal leaching parameters tailored to this specific deposit. Therefore, the present study focuses on the analysis of uranium ore from the Barun uranium deposit, utilizing X-ray fluorescence spectrometry (XRF) and elemental chemical analysis. Furthermore, a series of experiments were conducted, encompassing acid consumption tests, acid concentration determination, and various oxidant leaching tests. The findings reveal that: (1) The uranium ore within the deposit is abundant in minerals that exhibit resistance to acid dissolution, notably quartz and silicates (with SiO<sub>2</sub> and Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> contents reaching as high as 77.62 % and 15.65 %), whereas the content of minerals readily soluble under acidic conditions, such as carbonates, iron minerals, and sulfides, is relatively low (with the proportions of total carbon, total iron, and sulfur content being as low as 0.128 %, 0.881 %, and 0.26 %, respectively). The mineralogical attributes of this deposit suggest its suitability for the application of acid ISL. (2) During the acid leaching process of uranium ore, an optimal H<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub> concentration of 5 g/L was observed to yield a superior uranium leaching rate of 78.76 %, accompanied by a reduced sulfuric acid consumption of 115.8 tons per ton of uranium extracted. Notably, the pH of the leaching solution remained largely unaffected by the oxidant utilized. Under the influence of 1.5 g/L of 30 % H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub>, the uranium leaching rate achieved its maximum value of 90.27 %, significantly outperforming other oxidant conditions. (3) The acid leaching methodology is a viable option for the ISL of uranium from the Barun deposit. It is advisable to employ a concentration of 5 g/L H<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub> while maintaining the pH of the leaching solution below 2 for optimal performance. In response to the anticipated decrease in uranium concentration during the intermediate and later stages of the leaching process, the strategic addition of 1.5 g/L of 30 % H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> is recommended to facilitate the oxidative dissolution of tetravalent uranium minerals, thereby enhancing the overall leaching efficiency. This study offers significant insights and valuable references for future research on ISL of uranium in the Barun uranium deposit, as well as in other sandstone-hosted uranium deposits that possess comparable mineralogical characteristics.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100993,"journal":{"name":"Ore and Energy Resource Geology","volume":"18 ","pages":"Article 100085"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Optimization and identification of key process parameters for in-situ leaching of uranium in the Barun uranium deposit, China\",\"authors\":\"Peng Qiao ,&nbsp;Yuanqing Fan ,&nbsp;Shengqing Xiong ,&nbsp;Liangquan Ge ,&nbsp;Yixuan Yao ,&nbsp;Ruyi Wang ,&nbsp;Hao Song ,&nbsp;Huijie Yu ,&nbsp;Xiaoping Ren ,&nbsp;Zengjie Gui\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.oreoa.2025.100085\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Ascertaining the optimal process parameters for in-situ leaching (ISL) of uranium is crucial for maximizing both uranium leaching rates and enhancing the production efficiency of uranium mining endeavors. Nevertheless, limited research has been conducted on the chemical composition of uranium ore within the Barun uranium deposit, with a notable absence of indoor leaching experiments and in-depth discussions pertaining to the ISL technology for uranium and the identification of optimal leaching parameters tailored to this specific deposit. Therefore, the present study focuses on the analysis of uranium ore from the Barun uranium deposit, utilizing X-ray fluorescence spectrometry (XRF) and elemental chemical analysis. Furthermore, a series of experiments were conducted, encompassing acid consumption tests, acid concentration determination, and various oxidant leaching tests. The findings reveal that: (1) The uranium ore within the deposit is abundant in minerals that exhibit resistance to acid dissolution, notably quartz and silicates (with SiO<sub>2</sub> and Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> contents reaching as high as 77.62 % and 15.65 %), whereas the content of minerals readily soluble under acidic conditions, such as carbonates, iron minerals, and sulfides, is relatively low (with the proportions of total carbon, total iron, and sulfur content being as low as 0.128 %, 0.881 %, and 0.26 %, respectively). The mineralogical attributes of this deposit suggest its suitability for the application of acid ISL. (2) During the acid leaching process of uranium ore, an optimal H<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub> concentration of 5 g/L was observed to yield a superior uranium leaching rate of 78.76 %, accompanied by a reduced sulfuric acid consumption of 115.8 tons per ton of uranium extracted. Notably, the pH of the leaching solution remained largely unaffected by the oxidant utilized. Under the influence of 1.5 g/L of 30 % H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub>, the uranium leaching rate achieved its maximum value of 90.27 %, significantly outperforming other oxidant conditions. (3) The acid leaching methodology is a viable option for the ISL of uranium from the Barun deposit. It is advisable to employ a concentration of 5 g/L H<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub> while maintaining the pH of the leaching solution below 2 for optimal performance. In response to the anticipated decrease in uranium concentration during the intermediate and later stages of the leaching process, the strategic addition of 1.5 g/L of 30 % H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> is recommended to facilitate the oxidative dissolution of tetravalent uranium minerals, thereby enhancing the overall leaching efficiency. This study offers significant insights and valuable references for future research on ISL of uranium in the Barun uranium deposit, as well as in other sandstone-hosted uranium deposits that possess comparable mineralogical characteristics.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100993,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ore and Energy Resource Geology\",\"volume\":\"18 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100085\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ore and Energy Resource Geology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666261225000033\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ore and Energy Resource Geology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666261225000033","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

确定铀矿原地浸出的最佳工艺参数,对提高铀矿开采的浸出率和生产效率至关重要。然而,对Barun铀矿床内铀矿石的化学成分进行了有限的研究,明显缺乏室内浸出实验和关于铀的ISL技术的深入讨论,以及确定适合该特定矿床的最佳浸出参数。因此,本研究的重点是利用x射线荧光光谱(XRF)和元素化学分析对Barun铀矿床的铀矿石进行分析。此外,还进行了一系列实验,包括酸消耗试验、酸浓度测定和各种氧化剂浸出试验。研究结果显示:(1)矿床内铀矿石中耐酸溶矿物丰富,以石英和硅酸盐为主(SiO2和Al2O3含量分别高达77.62%和15.65%),而酸性易溶矿物碳酸盐、铁矿物和硫化物含量相对较低(总碳、总铁和总硫含量分别低至0.128%、0.881%和0.26%)。该矿床的矿物学特征表明其适合于酸性ISL的应用。(2)在铀矿石酸浸过程中,H2SO4最佳浓度为5 g/L时,铀浸出率可达78.76%,每提取1吨铀可减少硫酸用量115.8 t。值得注意的是,浸出液的pH值在很大程度上不受所用氧化剂的影响。在30% H2O2浓度为1.5 g/L的条件下,铀浸出率达到最大值90.27%,明显优于其他氧化条件。(3)酸浸法是Barun矿床铀的ISL的可行选择。建议使用浓度为5 g/L的H2SO4,同时将浸出液的pH值保持在2以下,以获得最佳性能。针对浸出中后期铀浓度下降的预期,建议策略添加1.5 g/L 30% H2O2,促进四价铀矿物氧化溶解,从而提高整体浸出效率。该研究为今后研究巴润铀矿床的铀的ISL提供了重要的见解和有价值的参考,同时也为其他具有类似矿物学特征的砂岩型铀矿床的ISL提供了参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Optimization and identification of key process parameters for in-situ leaching of uranium in the Barun uranium deposit, China
Ascertaining the optimal process parameters for in-situ leaching (ISL) of uranium is crucial for maximizing both uranium leaching rates and enhancing the production efficiency of uranium mining endeavors. Nevertheless, limited research has been conducted on the chemical composition of uranium ore within the Barun uranium deposit, with a notable absence of indoor leaching experiments and in-depth discussions pertaining to the ISL technology for uranium and the identification of optimal leaching parameters tailored to this specific deposit. Therefore, the present study focuses on the analysis of uranium ore from the Barun uranium deposit, utilizing X-ray fluorescence spectrometry (XRF) and elemental chemical analysis. Furthermore, a series of experiments were conducted, encompassing acid consumption tests, acid concentration determination, and various oxidant leaching tests. The findings reveal that: (1) The uranium ore within the deposit is abundant in minerals that exhibit resistance to acid dissolution, notably quartz and silicates (with SiO2 and Al2O3 contents reaching as high as 77.62 % and 15.65 %), whereas the content of minerals readily soluble under acidic conditions, such as carbonates, iron minerals, and sulfides, is relatively low (with the proportions of total carbon, total iron, and sulfur content being as low as 0.128 %, 0.881 %, and 0.26 %, respectively). The mineralogical attributes of this deposit suggest its suitability for the application of acid ISL. (2) During the acid leaching process of uranium ore, an optimal H2SO4 concentration of 5 g/L was observed to yield a superior uranium leaching rate of 78.76 %, accompanied by a reduced sulfuric acid consumption of 115.8 tons per ton of uranium extracted. Notably, the pH of the leaching solution remained largely unaffected by the oxidant utilized. Under the influence of 1.5 g/L of 30 % H2O2, the uranium leaching rate achieved its maximum value of 90.27 %, significantly outperforming other oxidant conditions. (3) The acid leaching methodology is a viable option for the ISL of uranium from the Barun deposit. It is advisable to employ a concentration of 5 g/L H2SO4 while maintaining the pH of the leaching solution below 2 for optimal performance. In response to the anticipated decrease in uranium concentration during the intermediate and later stages of the leaching process, the strategic addition of 1.5 g/L of 30 % H2O2 is recommended to facilitate the oxidative dissolution of tetravalent uranium minerals, thereby enhancing the overall leaching efficiency. This study offers significant insights and valuable references for future research on ISL of uranium in the Barun uranium deposit, as well as in other sandstone-hosted uranium deposits that possess comparable mineralogical characteristics.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信