使用1.5 mm内径柱的Microflow LC-MS自下而上蛋白质组学

IF 4.3 3区 化学 Q2 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Siddharth Jadeja, Denis K. Naplekov, Mykyta R. Starovoit, Kateřina Plachká, Harald Ritchie, Jason Lawhorn, Hana Sklenářová and Juraj Lenčo*, 
{"title":"使用1.5 mm内径柱的Microflow LC-MS自下而上蛋白质组学","authors":"Siddharth Jadeja,&nbsp;Denis K. Naplekov,&nbsp;Mykyta R. Starovoit,&nbsp;Kateřina Plachká,&nbsp;Harald Ritchie,&nbsp;Jason Lawhorn,&nbsp;Hana Sklenářová and Juraj Lenčo*,&nbsp;","doi":"10.1021/acsomega.4c1059110.1021/acsomega.4c10591","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >Microbore columns with a 1.0 mm inner diameter (i.d.) have gained popularity in microflow liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry (LC-MS) workflows for exploratory proteomics applications due to their high throughput, robustness, and reproducibility. However, obtaining highly efficient separation using these columns remains unachievable, primarily due to significant radial flow heterogeneity caused by uneven particle packing density across the column cross-section. In this study, we evaluated the integration of a 1.5 mm i.d. column, which offers greater packing uniformity and reduced radial flow dispersion, into a microflow LC-MS setup for bottom-up proteomics analysis. The performance of the 1.5 mm i.d. column was compared with that of the 1.0 mm i.d. column using protein samples of varying complexity. The results demonstrate that 1.5 mm i.d. columns provide superior chromatographic separation and better compatibility with conventional-flow LC systems, yielding higher reproducibility and comparable protein and peptide identifications to the 1.0 mm i.d. columns at higher sample amounts. These findings suggest that 1.5 mm i.d. columns could be a suitable alternative to 1.0 mm i.d. columns for microflow LC-MS/MS proteomic analysis, particularly in laboratories with only conventional-flow LC systems.</p>","PeriodicalId":22,"journal":{"name":"ACS Omega","volume":"10 4","pages":"4094–4101 4094–4101"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/epdf/10.1021/acsomega.4c10591","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Microflow LC-MS Bottom-Up Proteomics Using 1.5 mm Internal Diameter Columns\",\"authors\":\"Siddharth Jadeja,&nbsp;Denis K. Naplekov,&nbsp;Mykyta R. Starovoit,&nbsp;Kateřina Plachká,&nbsp;Harald Ritchie,&nbsp;Jason Lawhorn,&nbsp;Hana Sklenářová and Juraj Lenčo*,&nbsp;\",\"doi\":\"10.1021/acsomega.4c1059110.1021/acsomega.4c10591\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p >Microbore columns with a 1.0 mm inner diameter (i.d.) have gained popularity in microflow liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry (LC-MS) workflows for exploratory proteomics applications due to their high throughput, robustness, and reproducibility. However, obtaining highly efficient separation using these columns remains unachievable, primarily due to significant radial flow heterogeneity caused by uneven particle packing density across the column cross-section. In this study, we evaluated the integration of a 1.5 mm i.d. column, which offers greater packing uniformity and reduced radial flow dispersion, into a microflow LC-MS setup for bottom-up proteomics analysis. The performance of the 1.5 mm i.d. column was compared with that of the 1.0 mm i.d. column using protein samples of varying complexity. The results demonstrate that 1.5 mm i.d. columns provide superior chromatographic separation and better compatibility with conventional-flow LC systems, yielding higher reproducibility and comparable protein and peptide identifications to the 1.0 mm i.d. columns at higher sample amounts. These findings suggest that 1.5 mm i.d. columns could be a suitable alternative to 1.0 mm i.d. columns for microflow LC-MS/MS proteomic analysis, particularly in laboratories with only conventional-flow LC systems.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Omega\",\"volume\":\"10 4\",\"pages\":\"4094–4101 4094–4101\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/epdf/10.1021/acsomega.4c10591\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Omega\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"92\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsomega.4c10591\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Omega","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsomega.4c10591","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

内径1.0 mm的微孔柱由于其高通量、稳健性和可重复性,在蛋白质组学探索性应用的微流液相色谱-质谱(LC-MS)工作流程中得到了广泛的应用。然而,利用这些色谱柱获得高效分离仍然是无法实现的,主要是由于柱截面上颗粒堆积密度不均匀导致显著的径向流非均质性。在这项研究中,我们评估了将1.5 mm柱整合到微流LC-MS装置中,以进行自下而上的蛋白质组学分析,该柱具有更好的填充均匀性和减少径向流动分散。使用不同复杂程度的蛋白质样品,比较了1.5 mm色谱柱和1.0 mm色谱柱的性能。结果表明,1.5 mm色谱柱具有较好的色谱分离效果,与常规液相色谱系统具有更好的兼容性,在较高的样品量下,与1.0 mm色谱柱相比,可获得更高的重现性和可比较的蛋白质和肽鉴定。这些发现表明,对于微流LC-MS/MS蛋白质组学分析,特别是在只有常规流量LC系统的实验室中,1.5 mm的色谱柱可以替代1.0 mm的色谱柱。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Microflow LC-MS Bottom-Up Proteomics Using 1.5 mm Internal Diameter Columns

Microbore columns with a 1.0 mm inner diameter (i.d.) have gained popularity in microflow liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry (LC-MS) workflows for exploratory proteomics applications due to their high throughput, robustness, and reproducibility. However, obtaining highly efficient separation using these columns remains unachievable, primarily due to significant radial flow heterogeneity caused by uneven particle packing density across the column cross-section. In this study, we evaluated the integration of a 1.5 mm i.d. column, which offers greater packing uniformity and reduced radial flow dispersion, into a microflow LC-MS setup for bottom-up proteomics analysis. The performance of the 1.5 mm i.d. column was compared with that of the 1.0 mm i.d. column using protein samples of varying complexity. The results demonstrate that 1.5 mm i.d. columns provide superior chromatographic separation and better compatibility with conventional-flow LC systems, yielding higher reproducibility and comparable protein and peptide identifications to the 1.0 mm i.d. columns at higher sample amounts. These findings suggest that 1.5 mm i.d. columns could be a suitable alternative to 1.0 mm i.d. columns for microflow LC-MS/MS proteomic analysis, particularly in laboratories with only conventional-flow LC systems.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ACS Omega
ACS Omega Chemical Engineering-General Chemical Engineering
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
4.90%
发文量
3945
审稿时长
2.4 months
期刊介绍: ACS Omega is an open-access global publication for scientific articles that describe new findings in chemistry and interfacing areas of science, without any perceived evaluation of immediate impact.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信