Samuel P Moss, Daniel J. Shiwarski and Adam W. Feinberg*,
{"title":"新鲜的生物3D打印胶原蛋白类型I, II和III","authors":"Samuel P Moss, Daniel J. Shiwarski and Adam W. Feinberg*, ","doi":"10.1021/acsbiomaterials.4c0182610.1021/acsbiomaterials.4c01826","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >Collagens play a vital role in the mechanical integrity of tissues as well as in physical and chemical signaling throughout the body. As such, collagens are widely used biomaterials in tissue engineering; however, most 3D fabrication methods use only collagen type I and are restricted to simple cast or molded geometries that are not representative of native tissue. Freeform reversible embedding of suspended hydrogel (FRESH) 3D bioprinting has emerged as a method to fabricate complex 3D scaffolds from collagen I but has yet to be leveraged for other collagen isoforms. Here, we developed collagen type II, collagen type III, and combination bioinks for FRESH 3D bioprinting of millimeter-sized scaffolds with micrometer scale features with fidelity comparable to scaffolds fabricated with the established collagen I bioink. At the microscale, single filament extrusions were similar across all collagen bioinks with a nominal diameter of ∼100 μm using a 34-gauge needle. Scaffolds as large as 10 × 10 × 2 mm were also fabricated and showed similar overall resolution and fidelity across collagen bioinks. Finally, cell adhesion and growth on the different collagen bioinks as either cast or FRESH 3D bioprinted scaffolds were compared and found to support similar growth behaviors. In total, our results expand the range of collagen isoform bioinks that can be 3D bioprinted and demonstrate that collagen types I, II, III, and combinations thereof can all be FRESH printed with high fidelity and comparable biological response. This serves to expand the toolkit for the fabrication of tailored collagen scaffolds that can better recapitulate the extracellular matrix properties of specific tissue types.</p>","PeriodicalId":8,"journal":{"name":"ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering","volume":"11 1","pages":"556–563 556–563"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/epdf/10.1021/acsbiomaterials.4c01826","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"FRESH 3D Bioprinting of Collagen Types I, II, and III\",\"authors\":\"Samuel P Moss, Daniel J. Shiwarski and Adam W. Feinberg*, \",\"doi\":\"10.1021/acsbiomaterials.4c0182610.1021/acsbiomaterials.4c01826\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p >Collagens play a vital role in the mechanical integrity of tissues as well as in physical and chemical signaling throughout the body. As such, collagens are widely used biomaterials in tissue engineering; however, most 3D fabrication methods use only collagen type I and are restricted to simple cast or molded geometries that are not representative of native tissue. Freeform reversible embedding of suspended hydrogel (FRESH) 3D bioprinting has emerged as a method to fabricate complex 3D scaffolds from collagen I but has yet to be leveraged for other collagen isoforms. Here, we developed collagen type II, collagen type III, and combination bioinks for FRESH 3D bioprinting of millimeter-sized scaffolds with micrometer scale features with fidelity comparable to scaffolds fabricated with the established collagen I bioink. At the microscale, single filament extrusions were similar across all collagen bioinks with a nominal diameter of ∼100 μm using a 34-gauge needle. Scaffolds as large as 10 × 10 × 2 mm were also fabricated and showed similar overall resolution and fidelity across collagen bioinks. Finally, cell adhesion and growth on the different collagen bioinks as either cast or FRESH 3D bioprinted scaffolds were compared and found to support similar growth behaviors. In total, our results expand the range of collagen isoform bioinks that can be 3D bioprinted and demonstrate that collagen types I, II, III, and combinations thereof can all be FRESH printed with high fidelity and comparable biological response. This serves to expand the toolkit for the fabrication of tailored collagen scaffolds that can better recapitulate the extracellular matrix properties of specific tissue types.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"556–563 556–563\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/epdf/10.1021/acsbiomaterials.4c01826\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsbiomaterials.4c01826\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsbiomaterials.4c01826","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
FRESH 3D Bioprinting of Collagen Types I, II, and III
Collagens play a vital role in the mechanical integrity of tissues as well as in physical and chemical signaling throughout the body. As such, collagens are widely used biomaterials in tissue engineering; however, most 3D fabrication methods use only collagen type I and are restricted to simple cast or molded geometries that are not representative of native tissue. Freeform reversible embedding of suspended hydrogel (FRESH) 3D bioprinting has emerged as a method to fabricate complex 3D scaffolds from collagen I but has yet to be leveraged for other collagen isoforms. Here, we developed collagen type II, collagen type III, and combination bioinks for FRESH 3D bioprinting of millimeter-sized scaffolds with micrometer scale features with fidelity comparable to scaffolds fabricated with the established collagen I bioink. At the microscale, single filament extrusions were similar across all collagen bioinks with a nominal diameter of ∼100 μm using a 34-gauge needle. Scaffolds as large as 10 × 10 × 2 mm were also fabricated and showed similar overall resolution and fidelity across collagen bioinks. Finally, cell adhesion and growth on the different collagen bioinks as either cast or FRESH 3D bioprinted scaffolds were compared and found to support similar growth behaviors. In total, our results expand the range of collagen isoform bioinks that can be 3D bioprinted and demonstrate that collagen types I, II, III, and combinations thereof can all be FRESH printed with high fidelity and comparable biological response. This serves to expand the toolkit for the fabrication of tailored collagen scaffolds that can better recapitulate the extracellular matrix properties of specific tissue types.
期刊介绍:
ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering is the leading journal in the field of biomaterials, serving as an international forum for publishing cutting-edge research and innovative ideas on a broad range of topics:
Applications and Health – implantable tissues and devices, prosthesis, health risks, toxicology
Bio-interactions and Bio-compatibility – material-biology interactions, chemical/morphological/structural communication, mechanobiology, signaling and biological responses, immuno-engineering, calcification, coatings, corrosion and degradation of biomaterials and devices, biophysical regulation of cell functions
Characterization, Synthesis, and Modification – new biomaterials, bioinspired and biomimetic approaches to biomaterials, exploiting structural hierarchy and architectural control, combinatorial strategies for biomaterials discovery, genetic biomaterials design, synthetic biology, new composite systems, bionics, polymer synthesis
Controlled Release and Delivery Systems – biomaterial-based drug and gene delivery, bio-responsive delivery of regulatory molecules, pharmaceutical engineering
Healthcare Advances – clinical translation, regulatory issues, patient safety, emerging trends
Imaging and Diagnostics – imaging agents and probes, theranostics, biosensors, monitoring
Manufacturing and Technology – 3D printing, inks, organ-on-a-chip, bioreactor/perfusion systems, microdevices, BioMEMS, optics and electronics interfaces with biomaterials, systems integration
Modeling and Informatics Tools – scaling methods to guide biomaterial design, predictive algorithms for structure-function, biomechanics, integrating bioinformatics with biomaterials discovery, metabolomics in the context of biomaterials
Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine – basic and applied studies, cell therapies, scaffolds, vascularization, bioartificial organs, transplantation and functionality, cellular agriculture